Maksim

You clearly are misinformed on the latter. Those involved in this are precisely those who began it in 2006, along with loyal members we have gathered along the way, and with whom we have remained in contact after our disbandment. Feel free to stop by #nordreich and chat if you would like clarification.

Guess who's back? Back again. Nordreich's back -- tell a friend. o/ Nordreich

We got mother$%&@ing snakes on this mother$%&@ing plane. o/ SOAP

Iron and Uranium. http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_...tion_ID=1002259

Your quotation marks are appropriate. You're reading right out the Pacifican playbook, fine sir, and are no more individual than the rest of your collective horde.

Again, your leaders are able to define the vague requirements of ideas such as embracing the 'collective whole of progression' at their leisure. Likewise, ideological self-definitions are entirely irrelevant, as they will, time and time again, define themselves favourably. Your ideology may preach its support of freedom and mutual progress, but its manipulative nature and betrayal of its allies (in favour of annihilating them and subsequently subjugating them, or removing their right to assemble as an alliance) have been displayed, at this point, repetitively. Anyhow, keep drinking the Kool-Aid, bud -- you seem to have it down.

You lost me from the first paragraph with your utter lack of objectivity, speaking of "... Fascism and her 'Institutes of Evil.'" You've taken this concept and stated it brings about a number of effects contrary to freedom and Pacifican ideals, yet you've wholly failed to define its presence here on Digiterra, as well as the term itself. It exists as no more than a vague generalisation in your writing. Likewise, you fail to define why the New Pacific Order embodies Democratic Socialism and 'progress', the former requiring proof, the latter being subjective and irrelevant. In regard to progress, I believe Mises' statement from Interventionism, An Economic Analysis to be quite apropos: "Who is 'reactionary' and who is 'progressive'? Reaction against an unwise policy is not to be condemned. And progress towards chaos is not to be commended. Nothing should find acceptance just because it is new, radical, and fashionable. 'Orthodoxy' is not an evil if the doctrine on which the 'orthodox' stand is sound." Your 'progress', barbed with your leaders' deceit and oppression, fully merits reactionary action, as is currently occurring. The alliance you declare the beacon of freedom and progress has clarified itself as their complete antithesis: restricting and decreasing game membership, disbanding alliances at its will, oppressing freedom of speech, and an array of other violations of anything truly meriting the label of 'freedom'. Rather, if you are looking for Fascism on Digiterra, I'd recommend a mirror to permit better analysis of your jack-booted selves. As was stated earlier, your propaganda, saturated with simple generalisations and mindless self-glorification, appears best suited for your alliance forums. Also, I would recommend reviewing the grammar in the OP: you've botched a number of conjugations, specifically when referring to 'the Fascist'.

Well put. Ever vigilant.

Rock 'n' roll, MK. o/

C'est la lutte finale! Best wishes, International.

Doing them dirty FCO: nice work.

Get 'er done, DT. o/

Yeeeeehaw. It's on, boys.

Yes, I am getting it as well. It is quite, quite disappointing.

I believe Simon may have the right idea here.