John More Dread

Tech sent within hours of my complaint. This is a reliable seller.

This person owes me tech and has not yet paid.

Has it occurred to anyone that winning this game now involves developing a strategy to destroy DBDC? They have positioned themselves as the "end boss" of this video game. Unless you enjoy playing to lose, you should all be thinking about that dynamic. I may be biased, but I am also undeniably correct. Sooner or later the only way for all of you to not continue being losing losers who lose is to confront DBDC. Any non DBDC alliance strategy, of any alliance who wants to not be losers, should answer the question "how do we destroy DBDC?" If you are not playing to win, why bother continuing to play? This is said with no resentment to DBDC, the only alliance, in fact, comprised of winning winners who win. They are the winners and you are the losers. Even their lackeys losers who are pet and fed regularly. Submitting before the power of winners does not make you one. Seriously though, everyone... why protect your pixels, if all you are going to do with them... is lose? Are you all more satisfied to have a big stack of lose than a little one?

Pretty sure one of the major points is that DBDC doesn't need or care about CB's. Thus, any action anyone who is not in their greater AA sphere takes against them, up to and including spying, should be considered rational, as those nations are all short or long term targets of DBDC and allies already, making the sole reason not to anger them now angering them more later.

I see you are trying to get a new AA off the ground and already have a history of deals with at least one WTF member. I wish you luck, and I am also willing to buy tech from you. (6m/100t) Just msg me in game and instruct me where to send the cash (nation link below).

We have active posters. Just not ones who care about middle school psychodramas.

I was continuing Sam's "date" pun regarding our plans to war each other, that almost worked out but did not.

Arguing with Daenerys makes me want to join WD next round. You guys get it, and you're hilarious!

BAH HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I don't know daenerys, but this is funny. 3 of 4 supportive PMs I got regarding our "debate", including the Misfit one, said this about her in somewhat less polite terms EDIT: Between writing and posting this two other people called her on the same, above. Daenerys, seriously, no hostility, try to view yourself the way others view you, from the outside. I believe you must be smarter than you're allowing yourself to appear here.

That is the link I was referencing, where you let a neofascist themed nation back into your AA after having been kicked from the game for sending hate mail, which he claimed was actually from someone else. I did not mean to imply I thought your AA was pro nazi, but you DID allow a nazi themed nation to join your ranks, which I object to, and which is a totally separate issue that should be discussed elsewhere. All I will say here is: As long as you accept members like http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1000596 you will be seen as an AA that is sympathetic to fascist/nazi themed nations, and this one's leader is named after the engineer of the holocaust. If you don't want to be seen as an AA that endorses or accepts fascism, then don't accept members who glorify the holocaust. If you'd like to start a separate discussion of how accepting overtly pro nazi members shouldn't reflect negatively on you, you should do so elsewhere.

idk, I think my "post are" pretty good. At least, I don't makes flagrant grammatical errors in my responses to critiques of my flagrant grammatical errors, while simultaneously feeling qualified to instruct others on effective writing.

Good luck everyone. Since I know people will try to apply Stalinistic models of fairness as they do to every declaration, yes they have a higher ANS, but there ws no option that would have lined up with them evenly, and they clearly went for high ANS AAs.

Lol I recognize this reaction from years of dealing with people who have borderline and histrionic personality disorders. Should we stop before you cry?

This is the very argument you's have been trying to use and when you finally realized it wouldn't stick you then went and cherry picked stats and tried to present them as the pre war stats but little did you know i had already taken all the pre war stats. The argument does indeed stick. It flies with me, and I am currently at war with your AA, Rayvon

Wish CN forums had a like button. Daenarys has gotten to the point where she is saying "everyone sees through your lies" to everyone. So, since everyone but misfits has argued she is the one being dishonest, I wonder who the "everyone" is to which SHE is referring, who "sees through" the position held by literally everyone who isn't a Misfit. Does she have an imaginary friend?

Just wanted to point out that she wrote this in a post about witty writing, where she felt qualified to instruct me on how it is done. My reaction: "REAAALLLLY? Example me!"

TBH I'm glad you did. It felt good in an equally pointless metric-related way to hit it with a nuke. BTW I'm having fun in our war! I might be stomping now but I'm about to run out of cash due to terminal noobishness.

I acknowledge my faults. At this point, you're just providing me with narration. So ttyl, but I hope you enjoy continuing to argue with me in my absence, even after having said Think I'm gonna ignore you in favor of more clever debate partners, but I may respond to you in future if something merits an answer. Initially I was concerned about the image of the argument, but after recieving numerous supportive messages, including one from a misfit, stating that you were insufferable and expressing their sympathy, I realize you have no credibility and therefore I need not give you the attention you crave to maintain mine, even among YOUR alliance mates. So, have fun with this debate you're having. Or, rather, not having as you rested your case long ago.

What happened to "I rest my case?" Wow, Daenerys, its everything with you. Yes, I actually DID know their were prizes but lied and said I didn't as part of a Machiavellian scheme to replace the town's water supply with grape jello. Seriously, what would be my motivation for this? You act like everyone is plotting against you with their every action, but actually none of us care at all about you positively or negatively, the nightmare of someone with histrionic personality disorder.

"First you need..." this is what you tell kids to explain to them that everyone makes mistakes. How you consider it to be an argument in your favor is beyond me. Unless you literally feel you know everything and make no mistakes. "I rest my case". No you don't. I don't believe you. That would be far to much to hope for. Don't tell me it's Christmas if there aren't any presents!

I don't have any problems. I just meant, if you were going to continue to insult me, you might do better insulting things I actually feel inferior about, rather than things I not only firmly know in my heart I am fantastic at, but am unshakeably confident I am better than you at, as if your goal is to cause me emotional distress, you aren't going to do it by attacking my self-identified strengths. EDIT: Well, I'm sure I probably have some problems, but none that interfere with my leading an extremely joyful life! EDIT 2: While the meat of your argument is still drivel, that was the first time you've presented yourself in a way I found to be mildly funny/aesthetically pleasing in a "laughing WITH you" sort of way (the reposting in quotes of deal with it) if you expect people to read through your junk, you should try and be clever like this more often, to give us the occasional laugh, or I'm going to have to simply start pretending you don't exist and find a wittier verbal sparring partner.

Thanks for teaching me! I had no idea. Honestly I never looked at prizes. My goal was just to get big enough to nuke a bunch of people because I thought it would be fun (it's a BLAST). Honestly I probably wouldn't've played again if they hadn't changed the nuke rules. The old ones were absurd, it was way too easy to get nukes. But that's a tangent. I don't think I was even aware there WERE material prizes, though I may have been at one time.

Yes. that is the one time youve proven me wrong I was referring to. Not a lie, an error I voluntarily corrected once I realized it and could have easily let stand (YOU would have. Name ONE thing you've ever admitted to being wrong about? The fact that your opponents can admit errors, but you cannot, and that you also deliberately conflate error and lie, is simply a further blow to your credibility, as is the fact that the thing you identify with "also" above is the thing I already acknowledged, and again, as an adult human, I find it impossible to believe you're stupid enough to make this mistake by accident, and are instead trying to deliberately misrepresent our debate, using misinformation and hoping people don't scroll back far enough to realize how not only wrong but absurd and fantastical your argument is.

Yes, Joe, I am trying to learn, by asking you how reducing an enemy's casualties helps us. Please explain it to me. Use small words so that my idiot brain can conceptualize this data. Daenarys, what this proud noob proudly does, is argue for whatever point he thinks is actually true, regardless of what AA has claimed or disputed it. The fact that you think of this as a bad thing, and overtly say that one should make the argument that is best for one's AA, rather than the correct one, calls into question every claim you make in defense of Misfits, while simultaneously explaining why you continue to argue things that the community as a whole has determined are not only untrue but patently absurd. And yes, I have a big ego. Your point? Fortunately it is very hard to bruise, and has withstood attacks based in far more knowledge of my personality (for example, insults to my intelligence do nothing as I have a host of degrees and a tested IQ you would accuse me of lying if I posted, but insults based around, for example, me being a hypocrite for being a leftist living a wasteful, irresponsible lifestyle, or insults related to my stroke symptoms, or insults related to me being insensitive in friendships and romantic relationships, sleeping around, being a lazy slacker, having a messy studio apartment just might, because they are based in reality). So, I am not certain what your goal is, other than to give me a verbal sparring partner and healthy outlet for my sarcasm. And boost my already unhealthily large ego.

Also, the hate mail being from Skaro is the ONLY time you have EVER proven me wrong, and you've never proven me to be a liar.