Jump to content

Banned

Members
  • Posts

    778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Banned

  1. 33 minutes ago, jerdge said:

    I have nothing negative to say about Steeldor"s interactions with me: in the one or two occasions we had to do one with the other, eons ago, he's been nothing short of a gentleman.

     

    Nonetheless, I never drop an occasion to remind everyone that Steeldor had 64k tech erased for having received it from multies. Heavens know how much other ill-acquired tech he had and still has, how much his now disappeared mates of the time, which had the same tech farms, also had, how much tech and land they could raid also because of that tech, how much money Steeldor then made thanks to all that ill-acquired land, in the following many years.

     

    'Glorious' isn't the word I would choose.

    If you knew your head from your backside, you'd know that Steeldor wasn't using the same tech farms.  He was messaging new startup nations to acquire his tech, and often, his temp trades as well.  Yeah, yeah, it later came out that a lot of those startup nations turned out to multis, and tech was later erased. 

     

    His methods were dirty, for other reasons you haven't even begun to touch on, but absolutely not for the reasons you're trying to insinuate.

  2. 26 minutes ago, A1ph4 0m3ga said:


    All good points. But this war came because 1) DBDC declared war on the entire planet and 2) they openly spied NATO nations. 
     

    Their doom allies got thrown in. Minus the Templars, whom until recently, no one knew were also doom. Perhaps a name change is in order to let everyone know. 

    I mean, we openly declared war on the planet long enough that I have retired, played another game for a year and a half, and come back to poke around in trades.  It not exactly like this is some fresh complaint.  But hey, who am I to argue if you guys want to give me cheap land and tech?  But at least send me some real fighters please, if you going to declare I would enjoy a fight.  I hope you didn't burn the best in the blitz, if you can call this a blitz.

  3. TO: Baron Zemo | FROM: Banned
    TYPE: Defeat Alert | DATE: 12/5/2020 12:00:06 AM

    Your nation has been defeated in battle. You do not have enough troops to defend your nation and your government has been thrown into Anarchy. You have lost all of your tanks, 44 spies, 358.53 infrastructure has been destroyed, 89.63 technology was lost and $5,000,000.00 of your money reserves was destroyed due to the invasion and resulting riots. What troops you did have deployed have also been returned home

     

    TO: Baron Zemo | FROM: Banned
    TYPE: Defeat Alert | DATE: 12/5/2020 12:00:03 AM

    Your nation has been defeated in battle. You do not have enough troops to defend your nation and your government has been thrown into Anarchy. You have lost all of your tanks, 44 spies, 358.53 infrastructure has been destroyed, 89.63 technology was lost and $5,000,000.00 of your money reserves was destroyed due to the invasion and resulting riots. What troops you did have deployed have also been returned home.

  4. 2 hours ago, kerschbs said:


    I don’t mind DBDC, they’ve been living in a different world for ever and I respect them for what they were able to become. The entire world has either feared or avoided them for years. I wish they’d have done a little more than torment XX/SF and their underlings for the last decade or so but it is what it is.
     

    However to see WC take their banner and crow like she’s not someone who runs and hides at a moments notice is a little rich. 

    *Watches WC rush into a burning building, save everyone, and then run out*

     

    Hey everyone, look at WC running from that fire!

  5. 5 minutes ago, Kapleo said:

     

    Idk, the nearest nation in range? Get creative! Anyone from Oculus would be badass. That would take balls cause it would carry a big risk of retaliation. Attacking the smaller guys? Meh, not so much. 

    If you wanna fight Oculus, be my guest.  Not our job to fight your battles for you.

  6. 2 hours ago, kerschbs said:


    WC will never understand our way of life. She’s much more interested in protecting her nations self interests (read pixels) than anything else. 

    You guys put up one hell of a fight when we hit you, I'll give you that.  No wait, that must've been another raid.  My notes on NG read "Got hit, offered peace, cried a lot."

  7. 2 minutes ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:

     

    Apples and Oranges. You've directly hit two of my allies now while flying two different flags. It ain't a case of things not going my way; it's a case of you doing things which fit the definition of a rogue. If an ally of someone we raid has an issue with it then they're welcome to saddle up and do something about it, I'm sure you would welcome the same.

     

    You plink at the low-hanging fruit because you guys don't wanna risk climbing the tree any higher.

    We plink at the low-hanging fruit because statistically we cannot climb the tree to reach higher fast enough.

     

    Meanwhile, the fruit at the top just sits there while we both plink and plink away at things. I got no problem with your raiding in general as long as it doesn't touch my allies. I'm just pointing it out for the people at the back because you've hit my allies.

    I mean, you're welcome to have allies that aren't low-hanging fruit anytime you want I guess.

  8. 9 minutes ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:

     

     

    You, my friend, can doublethink and doubletalk all you want to avoid being defined as what you actually are. 

     

    You're still rogues. If NG were labelled rogues a year ago for their conduct, then you are without a doubt deserving of that label now.

    Considering you just give that label out every time something doesn't go your way, but somehow it never seems to apply to you and yours for doing the same stuff, it doesn't really mean much coming from you.

  9. 8 minutes ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:

     

     

    Oh I see. Thanks for clarifying your position that you are all at war with everyone for no reason.

     

    Which traditionally speaking, identifies you as offically being rogues.

     

    Good to have that cleared up.

    There's a section in the document on reasons.  If we are at war with you, I'm sure we might convey those reasons with you in private if we decide.

  10. Leaving vague terms so you can still make them impossible to comply with?  You should be specific, set the number of champions so you can't later dump some number 3x KNB's membership.  And set the number of rounds so everyone knows you're not going to come back later and declare the entire thing invalid on the grounds that one champion wanted 2 rounds and the other only wanted 1.  You have flip flopped so much on everything, nobody trusts you to not wiggle your way around into more torture of KNB by denying that you ever said what you said because you left an ambiguity disclaimer in an otherwise clear message.

  11. 6 minutes ago, Kapleo said:

    Doesn't really matter, as Johnny said, there was no date agreed upon to end hostilities even for those who accepted the surrender statement. Better luck next time. Back to the table in the meantime.

    Yes, yes.  "We accept your surrender"  *turns* "shoot the prisoners".

     

    We all saw how it went down.  No point arguing semantics Kapleo.  If Johnny didn't respect you enough to consult you before he accepted surrender, that doesn't sound like an LH problem.  It's how he treats all his allies really, he thinks he is a puppet master, but he's just a puppet.  Anyway, good war all.  Gratz on peace everyone.

×
×
  • Create New...