Jump to content

savethecheerleader

Members
  • Content Count

    321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by savethecheerleader

  1. Played the game under a different name in the Initiative days. Was a soldier for the MDC (lol inorite) and to be truthful I loved every blissfully ignorant minute of it. Always felt like an outsider when it came to TI politics, which is probably pretty fitting actually. But you know what? It was my first alliance and I refuse to remember it any way but fondly.

  2. [quote name='Believland' date='22 June 2010 - 11:10 PM' timestamp='1277266215' post='2347267']
    Were you in Terra Cotta?

    None the less, congrats on your move to Maroon. Better watch out for Wickedj though, he loves aliens and is a constant observer of the sky
    [/quote]
    I believe you are thinking of the alliance by the name of Rome.

    Good luck FSM. Hope maroon treats you well!

  3. [quote name='Hadrian' date='10 June 2010 - 03:22 AM' timestamp='1276158113' post='2331457']
    There must be some kind of mistake...there are a total of 6,814 "nuclear nations". How can there be over 8,000 MP's...? :blink:

    This is just me assuming that if one buys an MP, they are registered as nuclear capable and when they actually buy nukes, that they're registered as nuclear armed.

    But yes, that is a lot of nukes.
    [/quote]
    Probably due to nations in the top 5% also owning MP's.

  4. [quote name='New Frontier' date='25 April 2010 - 08:12 PM' timestamp='1272244315' post='2275174']
    Supreme Chancellor: Yours Truly
    Vice Chair: Jaym
    Senate Prefect: Princess Ro

    Chairman of the Intergalactic Banking Clan: Savethecheerleader
    High Envoy: Dementual
    Grand Admiral: Amelsh
    Grand Jedi Master: Jaym
    [/quote]
    I see what you did there.

  5. [quote name='Dochartaigh' date='15 April 2010 - 02:34 PM' timestamp='1271360073' post='2261590']
    i would have figured you would have been the first to DoW Gre. yet Methrage beat you to it. does this mean you find what Gre is doing to be morally righteous?

    also, while ineffectual, if others join in with GDA and OO here to ban the selling of tech to Gre, it would not be so ineffectual. but at least GDA and OO have the balls to do something more than talk unlike the vast majority of you.
    [/quote]
    DoW's would be better. But you're right, at least it's *something*.

  6. [quote name='BlkAK47002' date='07 April 2010 - 09:39 AM' timestamp='1270651142' post='2251629']
    Oh yes!!, You are absolutley right, Sure just because my nation doesn't have a high casualty rate means I must be a horrible fighter. Sure we aren't going to take in account that my alliance hasn't stupidly got itself involved in every major war in CN, Or that every war I've been in Ive won, Or that I know how to wage war effectively so I don't take as many casualties as some people do. Sure none of those factors account for my low casualty rate.

    Hey everyone, By Imperial Decree of Cataduanes your nation must live in shame if your casualty rate isn't ridiculously high. You do not have a voice on CN as of now. It is a sin to have an old nation with a low casualty rate!

    It is also now permitted to take a thread off topic by making things personal now also! Protect your nation links people!
    [/quote]
    I've seen overreactions, and I've seen missing the point of a post. But this... this is something special right here.

  7. [quote name='Seerow' date='01 April 2010 - 01:09 AM' timestamp='1270102142' post='2243372']
    Someone else already pointed out how funny it is to us to see everyone writing it off as an april fool's joke, so I have no problem reitterating it.


    But that isn't going to change anyone's mind, time will show you the truth.
    [/quote]
    Meh, that was my first guess anyway (double doggy April Fools). I'm just saying don't ask people not to call shenanigans in a thread created specifically to look like aforementioned shenanigans.

  8. [quote name='Seerow' date='01 April 2010 - 01:04 AM' timestamp='1270101842' post='2243357']
    You're right, and it's all part of the grander plan to set up Athens to be rolled, now that IRON and TOP are done with. This master plan will come to fruition within approximately 6 months.


    Now if we're done with crazy conspiracy theories can we go back to celebrating the rebirth of one of CN's oldest and most influential alliances?
    [/quote]
    Oooooooh whatever. If you lot didn't want these theories thrown around, you could have announced this thing at any other time. But you didn't. You decided to announce it on April Fool's Day, in the midst of war no less. :P

  9. [quote name='pezstar' date='01 April 2010 - 12:59 AM' timestamp='1270101522' post='2243350']
    ...You're kidding me, right? First, Vanguard goes and announces a treaty with an alliance we're at war with, then you two go and dissolve your alliances and "merge" into this without even talking to us? I came to ask you about it and got told to calm my butt down and celebrate because "We still love STA a lot, please don't be mad, we wanted it to be a secret."

    You know, we have been there for you through absolutely everything since we put our names on paper together. We are sick and tired of being walked over and treated like "Oh, that's just STA. They'll ALWAYS be there for us!" Screw you guys. We signed a treaty with MK. Not with LUE. Enjoy the reactions to your surprise. I hope it was worth it.
    [/quote]
    Reeks of "fake drama planned to give credence to April Fool's joke". You're in cahoots, the lot of yah.

  10. [quote name='Hyperion321' date='11 February 2010 - 11:00 PM' timestamp='1265950801' post='2176654']
    I suppose this whole argument is rather moot at this point. The war is back on. For this, there will be no white peace for you Legion. This war will be long, and for you it will be painful. Your alliance will be completely and utterly destroyed. Your tech - pillaged. Your nations - flattened. Your citizens - wiped out.

    We will not stop or slow down your destruction until you come to us, all together and together in agreement for once, asking for surrender. And no, you won't be able to pull this veto bullcrap again. Until you are ready to give up properly, enjoy your trip through hell. I know I will.

    tl;dr - You're screwed.
    [/quote]
    Seems a little harsh for what appears to be just a mix up, doesn't it?

  11. [quote name='Alterego' date='03 February 2010 - 12:25 AM' timestamp='1265178353' post='2155762']
    Congratulations STA. You weighed up everything and went with the massively superior side (56m V 118m) in this war to fight against the people who had your back only a a week or so ago for the side you were fighting against. This will never be forgotten and regularly brought up in the future. I cant see it as anything other that picking the larger side, which is sad because I never expected an alliance like STA to do something like that.
    [/quote]
    You're right, STA are in the wrong. I am sure there is a clause in their treaty with MK that absolves them of all obligations should MK find itself on the larger side of a war :v:

×
×
  • Create New...