Mjolnir

Also looking for long term tech details. PM me if interested/with offers: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...?Nation_ID=7361 Money is ready to go.

I, AllYourBase of Das Vierte Reich, surrender to karma forces.

To be honest, TOP did a great job filling up our slots. Before TOP, we had MA, GOD, TDE, RIA, ROK, and TTK all on Echelon and a good few of us were taking minor damage....

Oh that was it, oh.

So, cello when are you attacking?

Point 1: I missed the Echelon declaration of neutrality. Hell, I missed the convo when it was even being debated. Mind linking me to any shred of proof of what you just said? Point 2: The reason why 45% of Echelon nations are in peace is the same reason why any other alliance declares war and then jumps into peace - tactics. Don't worry, those 45% of Echelon nations will come out soon enough. Point 3: You insult Echelon's loyalty to her allies hinting that you wanted the complete opposite - war, patriotism, and to protect Echelon's allies, which is exactly why you attacked Echelon's allies: http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.as...&Extended=1 Whatever the case, you should not, I repeat, not bail on Echelon in times of war or when you are put on alert which is EXACTLY what you did. Did I miss anything?

Your understanding of mutualism (aka friendship) is a parasitic interaction, one where one alliance feeds off another and aims to further themselves through the harm of others just because they have something in "common." Use people for their protection and then talk smack about them behind their backs? You're surprised we cut you loose? I'm surprised we tried to fix our relationship for so long while you kept insulting our ways, alliance, and membership. Believe me when I say you got off easy.

More like 3v1 which is sad, but hey, I'm not complaining, I love being the underdog in a fight, both when outnumbered and outgunned. It really becomes sad though when those 3 alliances fail to break your defenses and have to activate further Mutual Defense Pacts for help especially when they are attacking =/

lol @ people not knowing that defenders always do more damage then attackers. I'm at war against 3 other people, doing 3 times as much damage to them as a whole then they are to me. Sure I'll take more damage then any one of them however, they'll end up eating more nukes and lose more NS Not to mention what dilber said earlier - people with higher infra lose much more money rebuilding then people with lower infra. Plus WRC with higher tech = Usual "winner" of nuclear wars in the sense that they take less NS loss in nuke damage taken.

Great War = Cyberverse equivalent for RL World War, not a war with LUE vs NPO. This isn't going to stop at 10,000 wars. Remember, the war started 21st. Most people jumped into peace that day. There's still thousands of people in peace that are probably going to jump out today or tomorrow. THAT'S when the war gets BIG. I wouldn't be surprised if the war hit 15,000 wars as there's also quite a few more alliances waiting on their MDPs to expire. This war _IS_ the successor to GW3. UJW was simply too small to be considered as a GW with NPO's side more then doubling GOONS' side. War of the Coalition was more then triple BLEU's side. This time the sides are somewhat even with a big "what happens at the end?"

http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=54956 It's not just one guy either. It's several guys, all in all just shy of 10 deserters. That accounts for well over 250,000 NS. I'd say we lost 300,000 NS from our non wartime standings. That's non wartime standings not counting all the nations in peace mode without an army.

That's not a reason to lack a MP, WRC, SDI or even a warchest.... =/

Boy, those are really going to get her ahead in life.

One rises to meet a challenge.

Hi baby. How you been? Kids doing aight? Topic: Great balls of fire indeed.