Jump to content

Nikita Gregarin

Members
  • Posts

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nikita Gregarin

  1. We all won't merge for the same reason the right and centrists won't merge, because despite all of us being communist, we are all a different branch of communism. While we all strive for the communist ideal, we all go about it differently. Therefore, intimate things such as alliance mergers of that magnitude would be difficult to implement successfully. I personally am very excited about "Warsaw 2.0" and unlike the original Warsaw Pact, I believe this one will be far less likely to fail. The signatory alliances have all come a long way since the original Warsaw Pact, and I think I can speak for us all when I say we have all learned alot. Therefore, this time around will, hopefully, be the last. Although the International and the Libertarian Socialist Federation did not join, much to our dismay, I believe the Warsaw Pact is a great step forward in preventing the further fracturing of the left. For those asking, yes, we plan to recruit more alliances as the turn up if they are willing. As far as the ODP unity is concerned, we have our reasons. Compromises had to be made to cater to the needs of the individual signatories to make the pact successful just like any other alliance bloc or treaty. Although, I am certain one day it will be a MDP, we are happy with what we can get for now. Spaseeba for all of those whom support this bloc, as for those who do not support it, I'm sorry that you feel the way you do, but it is what it is and it's here to stay. As for building a wall through the German Empire, we're working on that
  2. Alright, I have personally telegrammed each of the nations in our alliance to stand down except for those currently at war. I have instructed those currently at war to defend themselves if the nations we have attacked deny peace. We have officially "bowed out" of this war in light of the Mostly Harmless Alliance's stance on the situation. This will be my last post as this thread's purpose to me is now rendered moot. Spaseeba (Thank you) for those whom supported us.
  3. I'm not going to repeat myself..about 3 people said the same thing and you would receive the same response if I cared enough to dignify that flame bait of a post with a response. Off with you.
  4. I am quite suprised. Never would I have thought an alliance as small as ours would make such a splash here with a declaration of war. I was expecting the "lol, commies" or "Aww how cute, they wanna be tough..aww" To come up somewhere.
  5. From this standpoint we won't be launching any offensives against new nations within the ranks of the New Pacific Order, nore her allies. However, we will defend against attacks from current nations we are at war with.
  6. I can understand. However, I refuse to allow my nations to be Zied and they have to roll over and take it. Especially when we have offered peace now, in light of recent events.
  7. I would like to ask the MHA however, what we should do if the NPO nations we attacked decline our offers for peace.
  8. As am I. Perhaps it is for the best anyway. This war is a furious and intense war. One which would be difficult for a small alliance for us anyway. However, I believe we have accomplished our mission. We stood up, or tried to, for our principles by attacking the largest alliance within the CN sphere. With help of course, but even so, we did. So in a sence, we DID do what we came to do. I just wish we could have followed through more.
  9. Thank you neneko. It's nice to be commended from time to time. Now I will go to my forums and inform our alliance to back down. I officially withdraw our declaration of war. Considering I am the premier of our alliance, my withdrawl of the declaration is beyond contestation. Now I have to do all this work...contact all my alliance...ect ect...*Sigh* I hate work.
  10. I suppose we have no choice. This is quite disapointing considering our stance in the situation. For those alliances involved in this against the NPO, you have our support not only as liberation forces against tyranny and oppression of alliances, communist or otherwise, but as those seeking a friendlier political atmosphere where all alliances may one day co-exist without such back stabbing as what the NPO has done to OV.
  11. How is that not commendable? Rushing blindly screaming BANZAII into a slaughter is somehow commendable to you? We tried negotiations and diplomacy. If we were at the NS of NPO at the time they told us this, we would have used force of course. However, I can think of alot better ways to destroy my own alliance than attack the NPO with absolutly no support and no hope of victory. The same goes with MHA. Obviously, if MHA tells us to back down and we don't, we will be destroyed within 1 night with no support from Anti-NPO forces here. Considering this scenario, would you risk your member nations in such a suicidal situation?
  12. We're not asserting claim to any sphere. In fact, just the opposite, we're wanting to help LIBERATE the red sphere. We are multi colored, why would we lay claim to any sphere at all? If you don't believe me, you can look at our constitution.
  13. If the MHA attacks us without any support on our side, we may as well have declared war on NPO when we were a 10 nation alliance, the outcome would be the same.
  14. The Moldavi Doctrine is the one I wish to have go away. The Revenge Doctrine is an honorable one, and much like our UACNDD.
  15. Speaking of which, this leaves me with a question. Who do I even speak to in MHA?
  16. Our only wish is the Moldavi Doctrine to include a clause to allow alliances to belong on the red sphere. We do not need their anti-tech raiding protection. They could just as easily protect unaligned nations from tech raiders by simply looking to see if they have no alliance affiliation in their bio.
  17. I would expect no less from an alliance supporting imperialism of this magnitude. If we wanted to pick a fight, we would have declared on an alliance such as the Illumini Empire or an alliance we knew beyond a shadow of a doubt we could defeat WITHOUT the need for outside assistance. I agree however, that we will speak with the MHA, I am asking my Diplomat of Foreign Affairs, comrade Searon, to speak with them at once.
  18. I'm quite sure that since the NPO seem to record everything known to man, they would have it where they basically told us that we would be destroyed in 5 days. If we were a 1000+ nation with an equivalent overall NS, yes, we would have taken action right then and there. However, as I said before, do you really think we would have tried to launch a full scale attack on the NPO as we were then?
  19. The way the New Pacific Order was making it out as, they knew we were but a 10 nation alliance at the time. Sovereign or not, they had their imperialist Moldavi Doctrine, and I'm sure that if we would have contested the situation any further, they would not have hesitated to get rid of us because of the fact they wouldn't even need to break a sweat doing so.
  20. Mr. Sileath this was so long ago, we didn't keep any screen shots. We didn't forsee such a large conflict to begin so quickly, nore did we foresee any conflict against the NPO.
  21. To me, bandwagoning is simply an alliance that wants to fight for no reason at all but to fight. Unknown to most people whom I speak with, I personally dislike war. However, I will fight for what my alliance is built upon. A non CB would be if we were intentionally lingering on the red team and were told to change our color. My biggest complaint is the fact that we are a MULTI colored alliance and were still forced to change our colors! Even when we tried to explain this to the NPO, we were basically told that they didn't care, and we had 5 days before Khruschev only knows what happened to us. This I construed as a threat, but due to the shear size of the NPO, I merely bowed my head and walked away teary eyed agreeing to it. Thus, in a sence, giving up the Union of Communist Republic's sovereignity. We may as well have been under the NPO's viseroy.
  22. Very well.. Unfortunatly we have nations that have declared. However, I will send my foreign diplomat at once to see the what is. Again, if we are told to back down, obviously we cannot argue with the Mostly Harmless Alliance.
  23. Again, if we are forced to back down, then so be it. All things considered, do you believe in your right mind a then 10 nation alliance assaulting an alliance of 1000+? This is not bandwagoning, this is good leadership.
  24. To further solidify our point. Why would I risk the member nations of our glorious communist alliance for no reason? What kind of leader do you take me for? We have deep, ongoing reasons to war with the New Pacific Order. Granted, these reasons may not be completely aligned with those of the current political atmosphere. However, I believe the coalition army attacking the New Pacific Order indeed wants what we do. Freedom...Freedom from tyranny, the back stabbing, the endless oppression of the people's of Planet Bob. Even if we are contacted and forced to withdraw our Declaration of War. The world now knows whom we support.
×
×
  • Create New...