Jump to content

Drai

Members
  • Posts

    5,199
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Drai

  1. [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1329273856' post='2920820'] Assigning targets did not mean your nations performed, they were largely turtles (Not talking about 30k nations - up to 50k at the beginning - where we had you outnumbered). Upper tier I'm sure everyone knows we used that super awesome Legion strategy so there really isn't much to talk about there other than the few we did have out got sent packing in a big hurry largely by Umbrella, not MK - though that could be due to the insane activity levels of Um. Once they joined the few others we had out in 50k range they all encountered poor resistance. The offensive declarations (against TPF) weren't there like they had been in the previous fight and many didn't run attacks, etc. It's not like MK nations don't know what they're doing, we know full well they do, but for some reason didn't care to do it. Not of this is intended to compare penis sizes or to call MK names. It's just to say that the MK of today aint nothing special. [/quote]I assigned targets to people who I knew were generally active and had fought before. I'm sure we had a few nations in the first round or two that didn't sign on every day but after the mass-targeting rounds we were able to be selective. I think you're vastly overplaying a few mediocre/poor opponents you faced and trying to extrapolate it to our whole military. And MK declared far more wars on Legion in the upper tier than Umbrella did so I don't know where you get the idea that they were insanely active and we weren't (seriously, I had a couple MK nations stealing Umbrella targets because they were still available 1-2 days after being posted). This just makes me even more skeptical of your claims. [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1329274202' post='2920823'] Just caught this edit, sorry about not including it in my previous reply. Vol didn't need to go to PM regularly is what he's saying there. He could have but there was little point in it. [/quote] Yes he did because he said he wasn't able to buy nukes because he only got into peace mode twice.
  2. [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1329270422' post='2920773'] Thing is though, the few upper tier (obviously became mid tier in a hurry - and that was Umbrellas doing, not MKs) and mid tier nations that we had out of PM were greatly outnumbered by the DH coalition in that range, yet were running over MK nations that entire war. It was like they just didn't care. [/quote] That is absolutely false. I worked with most of our mid-upper tier that war as Baron of the Vanguard and nearly every single person in that range was on IRC daily to coordinate. The 50k+ range was a cakewalk on our side. Perhaps you had the one or two nations that were too lazy to get online regularly, but when I was assigning targets I was giving them out to whoever was online at the time because we had an excess of capable and competent fighters for the targets available in that range. Don't pretend to know what you're talking about and call it 'facts' in attempt to prove some point that is non-existent. Edit: We had deletions throughout a lot of 2010 after the TOP war and during early 2011 but those weren't the people on the battlefield and I can assure you that nearly everybody who still has a nation in MK is ready to fight. And yes, the lower tier was an uphill battle since it was constantly being spammed with higher-tech wonderheavy nations that the mid and upper tiers had beaten down. @volnavy, we took heavy damage that war because we were often fighting 3v1s or 3v2s in the upper tiers which puts us at a nuclear disadvantage. Also how did you have an easier time getting to peace mode than Rafael if you only were in peace mode twice throughout nearly 3 months. Your post is filled with stats that are proving a different point than what you're wanting them to say.
  3. [quote name='deth2munkies' timestamp='1329262741' post='2920633'] OOC: Yeah, sure, I'll bet they've started with the image macros already. [/quote] What kind of accusation is that!
  4. Roquentin was spying on NPO back when Umb was in Citadel. They probably deleted the topic by now but it happened.
  5. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1329237963' post='2920354'] I can't do that when Leet Guy continues to outright lie. He had bros snoop RoK's database to show Rampage never posted something on RoK's forums. End of. I've called out every spineless member of DH gov. They don't have the balls to show up. [/quote] Did you completely miss the part where 1337guy is saying that your screenshots are from 10 months before the instance you are accusing him of spying in? He wasn't Prince at that time, why would a Lord be ordering bros to do those things?
  6. [quote name='Unknown Smurf' timestamp='1329199273' post='2919986'] IRC... and I'm sure the alliances asked about it at the time the forum(s) were being set up. [/quote] Ok thanks
  7. [quote name='Unknown Smurf' timestamp='1329199057' post='2919978'] Yes because when Bros said he never uses his root admin access he wasn't lying. He was just giving it to other people in MK to use... [/quote] I didn't read much of the blog or any other threads, I thought it was mostly our general members claiming we didn't. Hence why I said "I think". Just so I don't have to go searching, where did bros claim this?
  8. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1329196031' post='2919883'] I love how MK outright lied before for whatever reason and now they're downplaying. [/quote] I think the only MK people who 'outright lied' were those who had no idea.
  9. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/5d4bx.gif[/IMG] Well at least we now know MK's motives for their charity drive.
  10. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1328949486' post='2918225'] Ever means ever [/quote] Go on then, we won't harvest your IP :>
  11. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1328677011' post='2916559'] No sign of Archon? He managed to turn the defeat of the UJW into the isolation of MK for 2 years. Or how about FANs leader? They had a number of great ideas ending with the attack on NoV followed by 2 years of isolation followed up by repeating history and going from a safe place with a multitude of friends to a cornered and battered alliance once again. [/quote] So who is the leader of the MK that is so widely referred to as leaders of the current world? You can't play both sides of that argument and choose whatever one is convenient. By all means, nominate him, I'm sure there are a few people who'd like to vote for him anyways. Maybe you can advance him a round or two. [spoiler]No I don't think MK are on top of the world, but that's something that often gets thrown at us by OWF posters trying to rally people against us.[/spoiler]
  12. @Kzoppistan I actually agree with most of what you said there, particularly "but just that some of your higher profile posters are @$$holes and your over-all vibe is that of elitist snobs." A lot of our government is very rational if you have an issue and wish to take it up with them privately, or if you want to come to our forums and have a meaningful discussion in the embassies. The 'badmouthing opponents' part was more of a statement I had wanted to make for a while now, your post was just the spark but it wasn't a direct response to you. I believe what you said about MK and Legion not really viewing one another as present opponents but rather through past NPO relations. The social manipulation you suggest probably largely comes from the fact that we're perceptive enough to pick up on little signs or conversations that happen on IRC and various forums. I think most of the competent alliances today follow that same gameplan though and MK has just been the go-to alliance to call out on manipulation for the past ~3 years. Again, I don't have much opposed to what you said there. I don't think your first post conveyed your points as clearly and a lot of people (myself included) misinterpreted that.
  13. [quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1328565505' post='2915588'] You know the first paragraph is even more true than the second, which is why you try to deny it so hard. [/quote] You know it's false which is why you have to push so hard for people to believe it. Oh wait, this kind of argument doesn't accomplish anything.
  14. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1328564843' post='2915582'] Kzopp is actually right on all accounts. It's a compliment. Sort of. [/quote] On his second paragraph to some extent, but certainly not the first.
  15. [quote name='Kzoppistan' timestamp='1328560025' post='2915540'] Altheus, you just have to realize that the entire operation is a giant circle jerk of hate perpetuated by !@#$ bags of mediocrity afflicted with delusions of elitism, most of whom who are in dire need of enema concoctions of self-reflection and empathy, all of which is done in a laughable effort to boost their own self-esteem and status within the eyes of the pack and it's sycophants. Surely you've noticed that MK's greatest weapon is their active membership and since humans are herd-like creatures most affected by social sentiment, they leverage the quantity (but rarely the quality) of their voices to set the tone of who is "in" and who is "out", it's how they've remained at the center of the post-Karma political landscape and manage push their opinions across their allies to assist in advancing their agenda. [/quote] It's easy to point out how all of your opponents behind the computer are giant spergs who shut themselves off from everything else around them, but that's usually not the case. The reason MK does well as an alliance is because we have intelligent and sane members for the most part. The people in charge lead balanced social and academic/professional lives, they know how to interact with people. This is why we can actually conduct FA business without looking like raving lunatics and can step back from the game and laugh at some of the insane people that we do come across. I'm looking forward to this competition because there are some great candidates from all eras of CN.
  16. [quote name='Guzalot' timestamp='1328069969' post='2912205'] That's fine. If that is what MK wants to be known for then go for it. It doesn't exactly instill fear. [/quote] Unlike your mother's appearance. Now I must be off as Jacapo has pointed out, we MKers have a prior engagement.
  17. [quote name='Isaac MatthewII' timestamp='1328049227' post='2911829'] [quote name='Leet Guy' timestamp='1328049125' post='2911827'] Yeah, the nation we put on her after the talks broke down. Yup. That one. [/quote] You know thats not true [/quote] [img]http://i.imgur.com/PuKw7.gif[/img] You tell em!
  18. [quote name='Olaf Styke' timestamp='1328016461' post='2911509'] Jesus, some attitude you guys have. Here we are, getting together in the spirit of charity and compassion, to raise a bit of money for those few medical professionals who have the guts and dedication to step outside the air-conditioned world of western medicine and get their hands dirty on the frontier... and all you can do is throw insults at VL for having reservations, and now me for having some empathy for the guy? Where is the spirit of compassion? Who cares weather he's suspicious, you guys should be above calling him names in a bloody CHARITY thread. That's only bound to turn people off it. Swallow your pride. It's a good cause. Don't let DWB get caught in IC crossfire. Edit: If you can't empathize or sympathize with VL's hesitation, that's fine, but the mature thing to do would have been to let it slide, not carry on mocking him for it for 2 pages. [/quote] All you two are doing is throwing backhand slaps and getting upset when we push you off. If you don't have something nice to say about a charity drive then get out and go write about it in a blog on the forums. Don't trash a thread because you want to express your concerns about our in-game intentions where people are trying to raise money for an international organization.
  19. Looking forward to this, glad to see something productive come out of this community.
  20. [quote name='Wu Tang Clan' timestamp='1327642222' post='2907960'] Such slander will not be tolerated. For too long the opinions of our people have been silenced in favor of unjust worship. Jihad embraces the presence of Allarchon in all lifeforms and acknowledges his blessed spirit lives in the hearts and souls of Jihadists regardless of petty alliance affiliation. We choose a different path in awaiting the great Mahdi of Allarchon when he returns at his rightful throne. [/quote] Not quite as eloquent as the original. [center][img]http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k222/draiwadle24/Mushqaeda1.png[/img][/center] Your time is running out, infidels.
  21. [center][img]http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k222/draiwadle24/MushqaedaFlag.png[/img][/center] The true jihadists already reside in Mushqaeda and any attempt to pretend otherwise is an act of ignorance towards Allarchon. Perhaps you have forgotten but we have already defeated the Southern Delgation: [spoiler][img]http://i.imgur.com/kNPio.gif[/img][/spoiler] And CCC: [spoiler][img]http://i1136.photobucket.com/albums/n499/mjoseph1/Cybernations%20MK/mushqaedaDOW.png[/img][/spoiler] Do you really wish to be next?
  22. 15 {132} [b](+0)[/b] Mushroom Kingdom : 21.24 --> 22.08 [b](+0.84) [/b] Well
  23. Worst Poster 2012 will greatly miss you. Regardless, you were active so thanks for that. Enjoy your post-CN endeavours.
×
×
  • Create New...