Drai

Mushqaeda wishes ODN the best, these infidels will fall fast.

- I wasn't referring to the Karma war, but we actually did take a pretty big hit there too. If only because our front dragged on for a couple months after others peaced out so we were taking a lot more nukes than anybody else. - TOP war was incredibly destructive and trying to say anything else is wrong. - The NPO war didn't hurt our upper tier much, although most of our upper tier did take 20+ nukes that war which adds up. However our lower and middle tiers were outnumbered hugely so overall this war did hurt us a lot. - The war a few months ago was pretty tame like I said. - And here we are again fighting multiple alliances, a couple entirely by ourselves. - Hi Roq this is not the context in which you like to bring up how we complain about damage, I am arguing against a claim made by Stonewall Jackson. So to Stonewall (and Unknown Smurf) yes we have taken a ton of damage. More than most on our side. Largely because of being on the longest fronts --> most nukes taken, but also some of the tougher opponents. This directly goes against your implication that we are standing on top and shouting words of encouragement to our friends.

[quote name='Stonewall Jaxon' timestamp='1341120664' post='3001023'] However, with this moronic CN mindset, one kid says to a bunch of other kids "Hey, let's control the hill TOGETHER!" and he sits on top while protected from the remaining kids (a minority in comparison, obviously) by his "allies," whom he only occasionally encourages with a passing "WE're doing great, huh guys? Let's all laugh at those powerless guys at the bottom!" and the dumb kids around him eat that !@#$ up. [/quote] Except that since MK has been 'on top' we've been on the heaviest front of our coalition's side in every war, minus the one a few months ago.

I will protect you.

Other, it depends on the situation. Cause of war, duration of the conflict, and amount of people in peace mode being the main factors.

Is the anthem thing a trick question where people thought "Oh Canada, our home and native land" was the first line which is technically incorrect because that is the first two lines? Or would that still have counted as being correct and we really have that many people who don't know the anthem...

Technically I'd say it's defensive but I view it as offensive.

Dave93 went through a lot of trauma from this incident and I don't know if that is reparable.

What a strange front to watch.

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/wKRdt.png[/IMG] Zeal her!

I support the common law practice of zealing.

Hellas, I am Macedonian and I heard that I might not be a good fit for your alliance anymore. Please advise me.

The best birthday present

[quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1339975223' post='2986714'] Someone grab his warchest data. [/quote] Our alliance believes in the freedom of information, so as you request: [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/kuRZj.png[/IMG]

[quote name='NeSiRsItSiRhC' timestamp='1339922722' post='2986377'] What exactly are you looking forward to? [/quote] A community that better represents the history mentioned in the OP. I hadn't seen anything to my liking until I talked to Alexandros.

Looking forward to this!

[quote name='RedPhx' timestamp='1339827623' post='2985649'] And as for the perspective itself I have had a lot to think about and pride myself on trying to see from different angles. [/quote] You certainly have brought a whole new perspective on zealing to my eyes. Thank you.

Earlier on this forum somebody questioned the common law practice of Zeals and what that entails as well as the notion of rights on the Planet Bob. What does zealing mean to you? How has zealing affected your experience here? When do you feel a zeal is necessary? When is a zeal unwarranted?

[quote name='RedPhx' timestamp='1339821203' post='2985574'] And @ Drai a zeal is where someone does something bad and the alliance affected attacks you till you have no more Infrastructure, Tech, or Land. It usually is something that affects the whole alliance and this war is because a guy named Dave39 either accepted information from someone who was spying on another alliance or was part of that spying (only part of that story has been told) and so Commonwealth of Sovereign Nations who the information came from declared a zeal on Dave39. [/quote] Is this actually a recognized thing or are you making it up?

What the h*ck is zeal?

[quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1339792978' post='2985147'] DraI is next in line. [/quote] Our campaign will never end :>

[quote name='MutedFaith' timestamp='1339654656' post='2983071'] Just when I thought we reached the maximum amount of !@#$%^&* possible in a CB, MK proves me wrong. [/quote] We get halfway closer to the maximum every time. Each increment is less and less but we'll never actually reach the max. So be prepared to say this again next war!

[quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1339643038' post='2982621'] It was our turn. 99% of you won't, so we got to go again. [/quote] 1% of CN starts 99% of the wars

Allarchon bless you dave93

[quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1339380948' post='2980503'] This relationship is far from over. Our government admittedly did not do enough to maintain relations after Janax and Rusty both left and Argent's explanation over this is sound. I'm fairly certain moving forward we will only grow closer as I continue to coup impero. [/quote] It was only an ODP, why cancel if this was the intent? Or do you mean for your relationship to develop into some magical non-treaty based form?