Jump to content

Varianz

Members
  • Posts

    2,319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Varianz

  1. None of your wars started until the middle of today at the earliest. The Initiative declared yesterday. By the time you entered your nations didn't have to do anything, our defenses were all but gone.
  2. I have a question for the Initiative/1200- Are you actually including UN in your group? I know you guys, you are all smarter then that. Wanna clarifiy?
  3. I would take UW over UN any day. At least they weren't cowards who waited until their enemies were already weak before attacking. Besides, we lulz them.
  4. Erm, no. We didn't try and steal it, we tried to save it. Read the merger post. Also: It's not siad it's said. It's not you it's you're. It's not im it's I'm.
  5. We don't want them, what if the fail is contagious?
  6. Thanks for the spelling correction. I'd include all the errors you've made tonight but I think there's a limit to how much you can put in one post. As for ending relations with us, umm, we were never informed of that. Even after the merger controversy we still told Naon that we were friends and would both help them and never attack them. Of course, that's out the window now, guess it was too much to expect UN to show a little honor and gratitude for the help we've given them. And on the trust issue, want to ask our allies if I can be trusted?
  7. Except that I haven't complained. Well that's not true. I'm not happy that we're being curb stomped, but whatever. This is TE. It's to be expected, and we can rebuild. I'm not happy because your alliance backstabbed us and jumped on the bandwaggon because you don't have the courage to fight your own battles.
  8. Think you can actually make up your mind this time?
  9. Again, I need a translation. From what I and Roman Empire codebreakers have been able to decipher, we think he means that we called UN good because they have allies. This is untrue. We called UN's allies good. We are quite certain that UN is fail.
  10. Umm...judging by the responses to your posts, I don't really think I'm "losing" anything. But let's confine our responses to one thread so the mods don't get angry (I have no desire to be admin bombed).
  11. This isn't complaining. This is responding to the inane dribel of someone who thinks he's tough because he has the backing of alliances who are far superior to him and is a latecomer to a beatdown. And yeah, I know we're at war. You started it when you back-stabbed us. Think I should post an official DoW?
  12. Yeah...the idea that you have the capability of making us "pay" for anything is laughable at best. And as for the "no attacks" thing, well, at least we have another example of UN so called "leadership" being pathetically uninformed http://tournament.cybernations.net/search_...yallexact=exact
  13. We tried to merge with UN after they got couped and their leader was away, and their interim leader had no idea what to do. Now we see your true colors, and we plan on destroying you for your crimes. Edit- P.S. Your alliance fails.
  14. I don't know about Damien, but EE was. Let's ask! Damien, are you secretley the despised one, he who must not be named, EE? Edit- Ask our allies. We keep our promises. Destroying you is just another promise we intend to fulfill.
  15. You mean until the Roman Empire destroys your sad excuse for an alliance?
  16. We've found another UN Minister of Defense! What are we up to now, 7?
  17. And the saga of UN failure continues...
  18. GDA, SWAT, MHA, the Roman Empire is proud to fight with you, our friends, our allies, our brothers in war.
  19. Am I the only one who couldn't understand a thing he just said? Someone wanna translate for me?
  20. I'm sure that if you were in our situation, where 99% of our nations have their defensive slots full, you'd have already surrendered. And speaking of whining and complaining, from the alliance that has to post TWO topics in the OWF because they were informed that RE was going to roll them? And who asked us to war slot fill their nations when they were getting destroyed by an alliance half their size? Lol. Yeah. We whine.
  21. So the informal non agression pact that we had is pretty much out the window I guess? At least the world can see that there is no honor in the UN.
  22. Hey, let's stop this right here. Initiative did outmanuever us, I'll admit it. We should have seen this coming. Yeah, it does kinda stink to be beat down by a group that outnumbers you almost 2:1, but whatever. Let's be honest, we've all been on both sides of a curbstomp, we all know how it feels. Let's have a good war, with no hard feelings, and move on, ok? TE was getting boring anyways, this has spiced it up. Keep it civil, we all have friends and lulz on both sides. P.S. I exclude the backstabbing and cowardly UN from this message of reconciliation.
  23. I'd ask you if you wanted to join our crusade against them, but I'm pretty sure that we could lose 90% of our members and still take them.
  24. Reasons why you should not join UN: 1. They are the laughingstock of Tournament Edition. Everyone of any importance thinks they are pathetic. 2. At last count, there have been five (yes 5) coups against them in a ten day period. 3. They were attacked by an alliance half their size. After begging every single alliance in the game to come to their rescue, and being ignored, they begged TPF to negotiate their surrender after three days of fighting. Just to repeat, half their size. And no one wanted to help them. 4. Their founder abandoned them, then tried to come back, and was banned from the game. 5. Several of their "High level government officials" asked my alliance, the Roman Empire, to war slot fill their nations when being attacked by the above mentioned half their size alliance. They did this because they were losing so badly that they had to resort to trying to cheat. 6. They can't organize a war to save their lives. You deserve better then the UN. Join a decent alliance, one that'll give you what you deserve.
×
×
  • Create New...