That-one-place

Well, that went well. o/ M16

This OP (Optional Pact) was a long time in the works. Glad to see it posted!

Well Flinders, if you know us... Obviously its going to be amazing.

We love our friends at Gondor! Much love to all our treaty partners. Simply put proven leadership and a new theme seems to have people excited. We wont let you down.

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1282668400' post='2429529'] Welcome to Red! I hope things go well and smoothly. [/quote] Thanks for all the warm wishes.

I mean.. Arent we like treaty partners? I thought things would be different between us Wicked. Hmmph who knew.. lol

[quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1282618024' post='2428642'] Thread needs more BOO FOR YAWOO [/quote] Wicked is always good for a Booing.

[quote name='nitroburn' timestamp='1282617148' post='2428610'] Congratulations on your DOE, Better at least have beer on your anniversary [/quote] You have my word! Also, P0rk, you make me laugh. You wont be dissatisfied..

Who approved this? CSN... Really?

Love you guys a ton!

Oh yeah... Our charter [center][b][color=red] THE STATION CHARTER[/color][b][/center] [b]I: Preamble[/b] Strength, Honor, Courage, Pride and Brotherhood bind members of The Station. These values charge members of The Station to defend their Brothers, Comrades, and Brothers-In-Arms against common enemies both domestic and foreign. Members of The Station pledge to never leave a Brother behind, while always upholding the values and kinship of the Cyberverse. [b]II: Human Resource/Admittance[/b] Members are the cornerstone of The Station’s success; therefore there are a few qualities all members of The Station must have. Extreme activity, a willingness to learn, advancement of communication and a promotion of Brotherhood combined to form the essence that are the core values members of The Station possess. Probationary members a.k.a. “Probies”: Upon applying, applicants are required to complete a three part process before being considered a full member. 1) After properly applying all Probies must complete a 72 hour questioning period which will be ran by the members. Questions will be as frequent or infrequent as desired by the current members. 2) Probies must complete a mandatory week long probationary period where activity and other knowledge of the Cyberverse will be judged. 3) Once Probies make it to step three, their application will be forwarded to the Chiefs who will review it. An applicant will be accepted into full membership by a 2/3 positive vote of the Chiefs. [b]III: Incident Command System[/b] Chiefs and officers of The Station are the outward voice of the general membership; they’re charged with acting in the best interest of The Station at all times. Structure and communication are keys to a successful alliance, as such all members will strive to uphold these values. A member of the command structure (Chiefs and Officers) may be voted out of office by a 2/3 vote by the Chiefs upon a formal inquiry. Members of the command structure are to be given one’s utmost respect at all times. 1)The Chiefs are the leaders of The Station and shall uphold the standards and values expected of the membership. There are three Chiefs of equal rank who will focus on the four major areas of the alliance command structure: Public information, Administration, Logistics, and Combat. Any and all major alliance decisions for The Station require a 2/3 vote by the Chiefs in order to move forward. The Chiefs have final say in any and all alliance affairs should they so choose. 2) Membership Rank and Structure: All members of The Station will be held to the charter and values of The Station. Outlined in the Human Resource/Admittance once a member applies said new members will be referred to as Probies. Once accepted as a full member Probies will be called a Firefighter (a term referring to general members). Maintaining activity both on the forums and IRC, showing knowledge of the Cyberverse will earn members the privilege to be promoted to the level of Engineer. 3) Captains/Officers: The Chiefs will appoint Captains; they will serve a length of time to be determined by the Chiefs. Captains may be replaced at the discretion of the Chiefs. Captains are the backbone of The Station; they will handle day-to-day operations of their individual sections for which they are appointed. No Captain shall infringe nor interfere in another Captain’s division, but are encouraged to work with other Captains to promote intra-alliance unity. 4) Lieutenants are selected from the Engineer ranks on the basis of extensive knowledge and activity. These members will be assigned major will serve as deputies to the Captains. It is the outlook that all members of The Station will progress through the ranks. 5) Engineers have the responsibility of mentoring young nations as well as assisting with minor projects and task assigned by their Captain. These members can be part of specialty groups and have limited forum moderation in their specific area of concentration. [b]IV: Combat Standards[/b] All nations of The Station are bound by the brotherhood under this charter are expected to defend The Station from all threats both foreign and domestic. For offensive alliance wars a 3/3 vote of affirmative must be made by the Chiefs. First strike nuking is permitted during times of war or by the approval of a Chief. No spy operations are permitted when not in a time of war. Raiding is allowed but will require the approval of each target by the Combat Officer or Chief. For attacks upon The Station reparations of 1.5 multiplied by the damages rounded up to the nearest three million will be expected from a member or their alliance if they wish to receive peace from The Station. [b]V: Amendments[/b] Amendments to this charter may be brought forward formally by any member. Amendment will be reviewed by the Chiefs and must pass with a 3/3 vote to be put in place.

How did CN last so long without firefighters?

Congrats! Hope you keep growing!

I am so happy about this!

[quote name='Crazy Crazy' date='18 July 2010 - 02:28 PM' timestamp='1279477705' post='2377448'] I think they will wait on that until we give them fake intel about a non-existing traitor trying to frame a minister first. [/quote] I would have to agree with this one the most.

Welcome to the show! Good luck and congrats on existing!

Glad to have you guys on-board! Let us know if you need anything.

I wish IAA all the best! You know we are here for you if you need anything.

[quote name='porksaber' date='10 July 2010 - 11:58 AM' timestamp='1278777483' post='2365862'] and it's that this has been settled in an amicable way, [b]and we're moving forward, right?[/b] [/quote] Correct, Nemesis is moving forward. To clear this up: Nemesis NEVER had any intention of attacking SLCB.

[quote name='porksaber' date='10 July 2010 - 01:05 AM' timestamp='1278738331' post='2365592'] No, that is the dude who sent a message ordering all SLCB memebers to change their AA to nemesis. T-O-P is the one who sent a PM telling us to either merger or be cancelled on. Both are very "ally-like" gestures, no? [/quote] This is not correct... No message stating merge with Nemesis or we will cancel was ever sent.

[quote name='porksaber' date='10 July 2010 - 12:19 AM' timestamp='1278735538' post='2365541'] Nemesis: This topic is about our treaty cancellation right? Lets keep it on track. If you want to throw someone under the bus for reasons i'm still not 100% clear on and working to resolve, as i'm sure pretty much every mutual ally can attest to, why not make it SLCB until all the cards are in? [/quote] Who is being thrown under the bus? Nemesis made our position clear. Unless you have more to share the cards are in.

[quote name='Van Hoo III' date='09 July 2010 - 11:32 PM' timestamp='1278732710' post='2365489'] You're aware that it was, yes. SLCB is aware of this too. None of that has anything to do with the SLCB/Nemesis fiasco nor is it a reason to continually ask us about it ... especially since you supposedly have no desire to attack them. [/quote] Correct. We have no desire to do such things. We do have the desire to know the treaty status of an alliance we canceled on whilst calling shenanigans.

[quote name='Van Hoo III' date='09 July 2010 - 11:14 PM' timestamp='1278731652' post='2365475'] Then you guys should probably stop contacting me and asking me what the status of our SLCB treaty is. You did so while stating you had no desire to attack them, yet I keep getting queries asking me for an update. If there is no DoW forthcoming, why the concern about RoK/SLCB relations? [/quote] Just looking out for friends Hoo. We Wouldn't want anything like this to happen to our friends at RoK. But I do have a question for you. Was your treaty with SLCB under review before we even brought the subject up? This makes me think you to have had some concerns or problems of your own.

[quote name='daggarz' date='09 July 2010 - 11:03 PM' timestamp='1278730999' post='2365458'] We are mobilized purely for precautionary reasons. This discussion is a little irrelevant [/quote] Still proper fun to watch!

[quote name='Schattenmann' date='09 July 2010 - 08:33 PM' timestamp='1278722014' post='2365330'] It [i]was[/i] the great Chairman Hal who dubbed me the "500-lb Mouth," but that, my friends, is another screenshot. [/quote] Speaking of screenshots....