Jump to content

Starcraftmazter

Members
  • Posts

    2,690
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Starcraftmazter

  1. Whom one chooses to attack has nothing to do with the respect they have for said entity.
  2. I implore everyone possible to declare war against DBDC so we would actually have a challenge (fat chance).
  3. Happy Birthday to DBDC from DT and such. o/ never skip leg day
  4. Authorised? Top lel. This is what (some) people actually believe. That DBDC authorises things or tells alliances what to do.
  5. Well we're all entitled to our opinions. It's just that some of us have more valid opinions than others.
  6. At that terrible rate, I hope you get no offers. I think it would be most entertaining if no such solution was found.
  7. Continuously? DBDC does not do that. If this is going to be your line to argument; Then I need not insult it, for your words do more than mine ever could to that end. It has been a golden standard in CN for a long time now that during war, tech deals do not get interrupted, and tech dealers are not targeted. If NpO wishes to break this convention, then fine; it will deal with the consequences. Do not however attempt to re-write history nor travel back in time to the year 2008. I would like to, but nobody is in range. If only you actually had this level of resolve, then your words may have meant something. Truthfully, I would be more than happy if that were to happen; at least then you won't complain about being attacked by DBDC.
  8. Pretty sure Bob was just using the logic of your own side against you. You really are ushering in the dark times of CN if attacking tech dealers is back on the table. Just because you say so doesn't make us so. You can't just go around dictating to other alliances with regard to whom they can economically cooperate with and not - like a tyrant. I look forward to hearing your emperor apologize for these transgressions.
  9. We're back to this? Attacking tech sellers during wars hasn't been a thing for years. :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: DT Probes has been part of DT for many years. It's difficult to say exactly how many since the idea is people eventually move onto our AA, but it's 3 years at least. Yeh, it's like this, DT Probes is a training academy for DT - which in itself is actually a training academy for DBDC. DT has never been an alliance to set trends. We are simply too apathetic and indifferent for CN. DBDC is not unlike us in that regard, which is why we get along pretty well. You will not find DT/DBDC scheming to take over CN nor subjugate other alliances - despite how much you want to believe this.
  10. Right so....because we did what you did first... you're in the right? Somehow? Err...
  11. Someone dared to interrupt his tech supply. Let me complete that sentence; saw an opportunity to get back at Polar for hitting our probes.
  12. Not sure if serious. Nobody in DT made so much as a post about this war until you people started making stupid claims about our military proess. Your reap what you sow.
  13. >mfw haven't been given orders by DBDC Boy do I feel left out
  14. Just because you say so doesn't make it so. Well that's rich given the above quote, isn't it? EZI is not a thing, it hasn't been a thing for a long time. Fact is, nobody cares about you at all - stop trying to make it a thing when it isn't. I look forward to the day you stop making up nonsense.
  15. Not really sure why you've gone ahead to say my support is "sudden" - I have always held this viewpoint, and I have never attacks or even discussed with anyone attacking anyone else's tech dealers, while always encouraging people to tech deal for many years now. I wouldn't merely refuse to endorse it, I would tell them they are retarded straight to their face - get on my level. Pretty sure nobody in DT or DT probes hit Polaris. Should have tried to build a nation and rally alliances to your cause. Pretty sure I can. You and everyone else had any large number of opportunities to do something about it.
  16. Well you've had a very long time to do something about those perceived problems of yours, not sure why you've waited until now. I would love that, and it is not an issue of having guts, but an issue of having a competent opposition. If you look at our history (let's say DT), we have fought countless times against very bad odds, including DBDC themselves, and we have enjoyed ourselves thoroughly. Yes we are pretty bored, but the blame lies squarely with a lack of a good opposition - we are hardly gutless. The same can be said for pretty much every other alliance in the coalition. Why after so so so many years and so many wars which directly disprove your points, you actually make claims with such stupidity, I have no idea. Yes but, if your allies do stupid things and hide in peace mode refusing to actually face the enemies which they themselves created, I think it's not unfair that their allies should be peripherally punished. If they refuse to fight us, if their allies refuse to fight us hiding in peace mode as well, they must be brought pain in some other way - even if it is as admitidly cruide as attacking their allies which are otherwise neutral in the specific conflict - there is simply no other alternative. Whenever it's justified? The one I am most unhappy about is a blanket DoW on any nation supplying DBDC with tech. http://www.cybernations.net/alliance_wars.asp?ID=10156 None of those nations attacked your allies. It is not, and nor are we a "ruling class". I have described the situation above - if your allies choose to target us and hide in peace mode, they must pay someone - and in this case, unfortunately through their allies.
  17. You can't be serious. Our forums are filled with a thousand posts a day of people complaining we aren't in war, for every day our alliance war screen wasn't full. We would love to take on more - much more, and would have loved this all along. Too bad so much of your side is hiding in peace mode.
  18. Avalanche has been targetted as a result of being allied to Polaris. This is not random nor war for the sake of war - Polaris and all her supporting allies will pay the price for her actions.
  19. That's one analysis, a more accurate one might be that DBDC does not particularly care about Pacifica and what they do; they are a sovereign alliance, and what they want to do is up to them, if they want to "rule the world", there's absolutely no problem there for DBDC, so long as they don't declare "eternal war" on DBDC's tech suppliers like Polaris has. Alliances always rise and fall based on various factors. That's been happening since forever anyway, this particular war changes nothing regarding that fact. Sounds like you're jealous or something? Can't we all just be friends and fight every now and again?
  20. 100t/3m has always been the standard, and from that came 200t/6m, and 200t/9m if the seller has the aid wonder, not entirely sure why this is a scam - it's a historically agreed to be a fair rate of exchange of tech to money.
×
×
  • Create New...