Jump to content

KaitlinK

Members
  • Posts

    958
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KaitlinK

  1. 3 hours ago, Helbrecht said:

    And here i thought all that brouhaha was all about Kait breaking all the booze bottles and dumping the good stuff.

     

    Drinking the good stuff may have led to the breaking of the bottles... just sayin

     

    I have no history with MI6 nor their leader, other than the behaviors Chimera has demonstrated since January. Its tragic when his poor decisions crush an alliance and betrays its membership with lie after lie. It is especially tragic when that alliance is fortunate enough to have so many outstanding members you frankly don't deserve. Thankfully a good portion of them now reside in TBC and are spared your continuing narcissism. Continue your actions, continue to mislead your membership time and time again, and it wont be a declaration of war that destroys what so many have worked to build. 

  2. <@KaitlinK> Did you and Hoo have "the talk" yet?
    <+Rampage3> Which one exactly?
    <+Rampage3> We talk a lot.
    <@KaitlinK> Bears & cubs talk
    <+Rampage3> ?
    <+Rampage3> PM. Hoo. Now.
    <~VanHooIII> LOL
    <~VanHooIII> Oh,we can have that talk here
    <+Rampage3> Wassup?
    <~VanHooIII> A bear, in the gay community
    * @KaitlinK turns on irc log for this
    <~VanHooIII> Is a burly, manly, usually larger and hairier guy
    <+Rampage3> And thanks to urban dictionary, I know that now.

     

    Congratulations Rampage!

  3. A little class is obviously a foreign concept to you so let me educate you. An alliance with a rich history that played, had loyal members, and created an environment that their members were proud to be a part of deserves to go out on their own terms with their own post should they choose it. Woo Hoo you were a crapstasic micro who just made a sad attempt to get a little bit of attention on the backs of a once great alliance.

     

    Valhalla you will be missed, and I wish all former members of this alliance only the best.

  4. [quote name='Blacky' timestamp='1328408126' post='2914665']
    I can't prove what you knew, but you should have known. I even explained that since both governments were involved, and since by your account "the war was no longer valid", that unless you assumed Adel was incompetent (which she actually was, but luckily was confronted by our guys) you should have known that discussions were ongoing.
    [/quote]

    Okay so far you have gone from I Knew, to I Dont Know What You Knew, to you Should have Known...

    Many things you have said I do agree with and some I can even see your point on, for example you were right about going back to your old AA before you were nuked but my point remains you switched AA's while you were at war. Since I am not a member of MK I can only go by what a nations AA reads at the time they declare.

  5. [quote name='Blacky' timestamp='1328406805' post='2914656']
    She was aware that either discussions were ongoing (as they had been) or that they were being initiated at the time.
    [/quote]

    That would be incorrect on both counts...
    As I stated earlier had I known talks were underway (which I still dont know when these talks started) I would not have thrown a couple of nukes into an already messy and somewhat unique situation. If only because I would not want to make things more difficult for the current leadership of RoK given what they are currently dealing with.

  6. [quote name='Blacky' timestamp='1328405430' post='2914643']
    Bob Ilyani and Joe Stupid who sanctioned the attacks never said you were now off limits. By the time Adel was in power due to the coup (OOC: because the forums were taken down and they were demasked), the war had already been escalated to a nuclear war and you had been readmitted into Rok without having had the war cleared up. As I have previously stated in this thread, the failure to resolve the issue has de-facto escalated it to a state of war between two alliances. Of course, MK is still reasonable and has not responded to the escalation as of yet and is continuing negotiations with an inexperienced leader who is making matters more difficult.
    [/quote]

    It should be pointed out that your nation and others were not on the MK banner when your wars were declared and your butts were both nuked after a request for peace was made. You returned to the MK banner while in a nuclear war and when that war expired nations under the MK banner declared on my nation neither I believe have been sent nukes but have had no reservation about sending them to me... Please correct me if I am mistaken Blacky but I believe mine is an accurate account of the current situation.

  7. [quote name='rapmanej' timestamp='1328391441' post='2914569']
    In regards to the attacks, your nation ceased to be a part of the RoK AA from approx the time Joe and Bob served notice to MK on the subject to the time I guess Adel ascended to the leader of Rok. However, general CN protocol calls for nations with ongoing wars to not being granted entrance (or I guess in your situation re-entrance). There were several mistakes made that have made this situation worse. First, (even though you may have felt justified in doing so) nuking an MK nation was a mistake, Adel letting back in a nation at nuclear war was a second mistake, and finally, nuking a second time while in the middle of negotiations was the third and biggest mistake. This whole situation would have been resolved had you not sent a nuke, and Adel properly informing MK that KK was re-admitted to Rok. I could be wrong, but I am of the opinion that your nuke during the middle of negotiations was a coincidence, but that falls on Adel, as she should have informed you about impending negotiations.
    [/quote]

    I happen to agree with quite a bit of your post. I still think that nations that decline peace, not waving the MK banner and raiding a nation cant really complain about being nuked. I will state that had I known RoK was in negotiations I wouldnt have added a couple of nukes to an already messy situation.

  8. [quote name='Il Impero Romano' timestamp='1328387294' post='2914546']
    I get the feeling that if you would have told this to your former alliance months ago, they may not be where they are today.
    [/quote]

    He did...
    Screwing over VE (which is exactly what happened) was not supported by Hoo nor the leader that took over for Taut (that would be me) He was vocal in not liking HOW SF was dropped (which was a mistake that I have to own 100%) The sad truth is the decline of Ragnarok can be attributed to leadship trying (and failing) to do things their OWN way.

    One other thing that is worth mentioning here is that raids have risks... duh Yes, if the MK group that raided my nation is going to attack me they shouldnt have been surprised that after I asked for peace and was turned down they were going to get a nuke in their inbox. I dont believe I have sent a nuke to the nations that have have attacked me under the MK banner because I have been recently informed that there are negotiations ongoing. Though I am uncertain as to what "negotiations" need to take place? They raided a nation that was served up to them on a platter (again perfectly legal via the RoK charter) but those attacks should have ceased the moment they learned I am still the property of Ragnarok.

  9. [quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1315110232' post='2794298']
    Considering that our ties to MJ (who GOD and SF think are actively gunning for them) are much more indirect than Olympus's, I'd say it's likely GOD will try and put the focus on you. That way, they get to save face without risking being rolled by MJ. So...the latter.
    [/quote]

    Should that be the case, I would say they underestimate the affection that is held for you.

×
×
  • Create New...