Jump to content

Sardonic

Members
  • Posts

    3,129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by Sardonic

  1. What actually transpires behind the closed doors of an alliances' leadership?
    Decent p̢͖̖͓̻e͚̘͎̮̙ọ̣͈̼p̜ḻ̮̀e̶̦̝͈͖͇ ̺͘s͜҉̤̬͇͇͎h̸͏̫̗̤̙̖̤͍ͅo̢͕̠͚̰͚͝u͢͡҉̲̰̣̲̖l̀͏͚̘͈̗̗͠d͏͍̲̤͕̕͘n̼̤͇̮͎͖͘͟ͅ’͓̗̗̫͕͎̭̕͢t͍̦̹̰̹̟͔̩ ͖̤̳̟͉̻ͅt̶̷̥̝̯͕̖̯̤͢h͍̬̕͞i̷̝̭̺̰͇̕͠n̛̞͖̰͟k̭̹͙̯̹͢ͅ ̸̨̝̮͖̜͈͙̟͇͍͟t̨̩̞͓̪̥̗o̢͔̺̰̠͔̗o͓̺͍͈̙̗̗̹͡͞ m҉͏̲͇̗͍̖̤̥̞͎̬̜́͟͠ư̷̡̡̼̺̗̻̘̥̞͚̝͈̙c̳̠͖͓͔͖͕̦̮͔̲̖̜̪͘͜͡͝h͏̨҉͙͚̻̯̣̱̜̪͕̫ ̴̨̰̼̤̩͕̮̩̪͓͎̬͕̥̪̫̭̼̣͜͜͢a͟͞͏̸̥͇̱̹̤̯͎̙̫͚̮̘͖̖͚̰͟b҉̗̼̙̬̪̥͓͇̝͇̗̤͚͓͇͟ͅo̸̧̯̪͎̪̯̪̘̺͜͝ṷ̢̠̠̻̠̱͕͚̯͎̝͎͙̬̜͢͜͡͞ͅt̸̡̡̛̯̤̞̲̰͎̩̙̻͙̫̩̙̲͓̙̺ͅ ̳̤̜̕͘͢͢͢ͅţ̴̶̸̨͓̱̣̪̼͍h̴̫̺̙̦͈́͟͞ͅͅͅͅá̷̱͈̙̼̹͕̠̜͢ţ͉͈͔̩͔̫̞̠ͅ.

  2. TLR wasn't the alliance IRON was originally supposed to fight. They were supposed to fight GATO but threw a fit over the prospect of fighting GATO's upper tier. TLR was a compromise that IRON chose and insisted upon.

    LoSS was rushed in because they were concerned they would end up getting pulled in by the otherside. The decision to put them on NG was made spur of the moment by people who had little to do with the macro-management of the coalition itself. IRON's response (threatening to counter LoSS) was handled and resolved through a negotiation where NG mad an ass of itself and IRON ultimately opted to continue to prefer its allies among the coalition and its commitment to the coalition.

    To broadly respond to your point though, you're giving way too much credit to the architects of that coalition. It was as surprising and baffling to us that IRON fared so badly in the war as it probably was to IRON. You're of course free to reject this, but know that I myself would much prefer to believe it was a huge conspiracy and have little to gain at this point from blowing smoke up anyone's ass. History is just never quite that interesting.

    I'll go ahead and second this, I distinctly recall the last minute reassignment to TLR, mainly because I was allied to TLR at the time. Was not terribly happy about that reassignment either but IRON seemed more than happy to take it over the alternative.

  3. Pretty much this. The coalition ABSOLUTELY, 100% betrayed IRON 1st. This is not in dispute, and if you dispute it, you are just trying too hard to be a good soldier.

    OK, I'll bite. How did the coalition betray IRON?

    I remember a lot of people resenting IRON for taking a softball target in the war but I can't recall anything that could approach a 'betrayal' by the coalition, certainly nothing that could materially be constructed as a 'betrayal'.

  4. Important historical note to readers: [the terms offered] were something ridiculous like 6 months of no tech importation.

    I recalled the term but I was unsure if it had come straight from NPO or if it was truly the voice of the EQ committee of leaders. I suppose you answered that question for me, thanks. Unless other AA's had floated that possibility as well? It was a rather insulting opening offer. :facepalm:

×
×
  • Create New...