Jump to content

Kowalski

Members
  • Posts

    1,134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kowalski

  1. FAN were just collectively sick in their mouths a little.
  2. [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1358895765' post='3084034'] This can be said about every war since TOP hit MK, so I hope you weren't trying to take a shot with that comment. [/quote] Sigh. Can't even compliment the opposition now without some pissy little princess getting sand in her vagina.
  3. [quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1358895568' post='3084030'] I did not know an enemy declaration could ever be this beautiful. It's every target I wanted, every target I didn't know I wanted and even a few more just to keep things exciting. [/quote] No ponies
  4. [quote name='OverlordShinnra' timestamp='1358893820' post='3084011'] I'm trying to find out who went through the most trouble to give us some lovin. The best I can tell its Invicta. Invicta MDoAP w/ Legion Legion MDoAP w/ NpO NpO MDoAP w/ FARK FARK MDoAP w/ R&R R&R MDoAP w/ NATO [/quote] It's about time these stupid ex-heg dinosaurs realised how to fight a coalition war properly. They've been on the receiving end of it in the last couple of wars and suffered while complaining about the tactic and whining about honour and 'proper' DoWs. Two gangs face off in a free-for-all and the one that can persuade the most friends to fight wins, no surprise that when the possibility of victory presents itself that the tactic is suddenly more acceptable than it has been in the past. Fair play, looks like they'll have the numbers to win this one, although that should be obvious as if that wasn't the case they would never have started this thing.
  5. You'll struggle to cover all of your targets with that list of alliances.
  6. [quote name='TRON IX' timestamp='1358553612' post='3078819'] Ai was founded on the principles of honor, integrity and respect. In this vein, we don't go around messing with other alliances, and we expect that in return. [/quote] I'm not sure if I'll ever stop chuckling at this.
  7. Sleep tight sweet princes. A wondeful alliance of wonderful people, a loss to CN. [img]http://webpranx.com/images/jjredick.jpg[/img]
  8. About time, only two years after the vote was passed.
  9. So sad, my first alliance and a great introduction to CN. All the best to a lot of wonderful people.
  10. [quote name='HeroofTime55' timestamp='1344280696' post='3019198'] It's satisfying to only make a handful of posts over the past several months, and have my reputation still get me on this list. [/quote] No, those handful of posts got you on the list just as much as your reputation.
  11. [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1342300321' post='3010240'] I hate to be a !@#$%, but if you don't want to use your power to help GOD then cancel the treaty. Signing an eternal MADP (Even if you somehow magically uneternally downgrade) is a "Political Commitment" in the first place. [/quote] I don't believe that for a minute, you love being a !@#$%. It's the only explanation.
  12. [quote name='simon2269' timestamp='1342180591' post='3009660'] Would VE be a better ally if they had put a much larger percentage of their NS in peacemode, prolonged their involvement in the conflict whilst doing and receveiving the same amount of damage ouver the extended period of time by cycling in and out of PM? [/quote] To some, yes, because while it is less effective militarily it signifies more of a political commitment and there's nothing more that some of that coalition want than for VE to commit politically which would tear us further away from our other allies. In fact I'd go so far as to say they know that they're going to lose the war and therefore don't care one jot about how much damage VE does on the battlefield, they just want to make sure that VE commits as much to their coalition as possible and therefore puts a strain on ties with our other allies as it increases the chances of our future lying in that direction. VE of course was well aware of this and wanted no part in the game of silly buggers, given that we had one ally who we wanted to defend militarily and others who we wanted to maintain our friendship with. This is why those critical of VE were pissed when we didn't buy into the coalition philosophy and attack NG or go into peace mode, because it meant they had less chance to get their claws into us, damage our relationship with our other allies and use that to their benefit in future conflicts.
  13. [quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1342139151' post='3009430'] All I got out of reading Brookbank, was that in this war, NPO showed VE why GGA doesnt need WRC's. Did I read the thread right? [/quote] All I got was that he's pissed about losing his lvl 9 planes medal.
  14. [quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1342085243' post='3009001'] edit: I also love how obvious the replies are here that VE declared politically, not to actually defend GOD. [/quote] [quote name='Jonathan Brookbank' timestamp='1342095223' post='3009062'] While some people from SF are crying, there are others (including non SF folks) that recognized from the very beginning what ZombVE's intentions were here. This thread has only served to prove us right. [/quote] I love how you two continue to suggest that you've uncovered some sort of secret or that you'd called this all along when we denied it. Our intentions and attitude to this war were clearly laid out by Impero in the DoW thread, you aren't onto any kind of hidden plan here so need need for the endless self-congratulation and back-slapping.
  15. Interesting. I've always liked Olympus, not the other two, but hopefully the combined forces will live up to their name and create some chaos in CN.
  16. [quote name='Gen Lee' timestamp='1342064718' post='3008737'] Must say I'm very disappointed in the resolve of an alliance we have considered friends for a long time. Alas, "Friendship isn't about whom you have known the longest... It's about who came, and never left your side." ~ Anonymous. [/quote] Strange, we've been coming to the same conclusion over the last six months as well.
  17. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1341174369' post='3001314'] Have you grown so tired, Warrior Concept, that you chant some off-kilter non sequitur like a child on a playground? Then I will leave you to your slumber and remember your past self well. [/quote] You back down well sir.
  18. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1341172506' post='3001298'] But you know as well as all of us that Umbrella knew where the war was headed, and they [b]decided [/b]to join the action on the other side early rather than let the dominoes fall. [/quote] Of course we all know that, I haven't seen anywhere that this has been disputed. Umbrella have always been coalition fighters rather than waiting to defend allies and shout about HONOR! HONOR! so I don't see why this would be any different. You guys (yourself, death, alterego etc.) are really clutching at straws this war. There's nothing you can 'expose' about Umbrella that we don't already know are aren't comfortable with. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1341172506' post='3001298'] If VE wants to pretend that their allies who are watching VE burn are still good allies, convince your members on your own forum. Out here, we're not stupid. [/quote] Yes, yes you are.
  19. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1341161005' post='3001211'] Because they're trying to project this image being hardcore fighters and whatnot while fighting alliances that have been on the losing end of most recent wars, and Umbrella wouldn't help VE even if they asked. "We'll only attack you if you're already going to lose! Rawr" We can pretend the motivation for this thread is "WE'RE TAKING TARGETS RAWR," like Umbrella has been trying to do, but the real motivation is "WE'LL DO OUR BEST TO IMPRESS YOU MASSAH." [/quote] Well of course Umbrella wouldn't help us even if we asked, they're fighting on the other side. I doubt there's anyone in Umbrella who is pretending that they would, and anyone in VE who would expect them to. This isn't like Sparta saying "yeah, we know the score, we're going to be on different sides" over and over and then actually realising what it meant only after war were declared. It seems to me the reason for this thread is to pre-empt the crying and whining as happened when Umbrella engaged nations of alliances that were attacking GOONS without issuing a DoW on that/those alliance/s. Umbrella aren't going to impress anyone that matters to them with this stance because it's nothing new; anyone who matters to Umbrella already knows that Umbrella will happily attack nations of alliances engaging their allies without a DoW and Umbrella know that. It's an attempt to head off a moralist circlejerk by reminding those who have trouble putting two and two together and coming up with four of the situation before they conveniently forget fact, precedent, history and that they really don't matter one little bit in the greater scheme of things and go on some nonsensical tirade. Unfortunately it appears to have failed miserably.
  20. If you're saying that can remember a time when Umbrella issued a DoW before attacking an alliance that has attacked an ally, then yes you're right. Nowadays sometimes they'll issue a DoW, sometimes they won't, and sometimes they won't even attack.
  21. [quote name='Sir Paul' timestamp='1341097438' post='3000797'] FOOLS! By involving the mighty Pacifica in this conflict, [/quote] You came in of your own accord.
×
×
  • Create New...