Perconte

Uhhhhh.... they did? They did well in the GENIUS war, but in this war they really didn't do very well. It was only 2:1 odds for us and they had the advantage of the quad attack and surprise. They SHOULD have hurt us badly, but they hardly put a dent in our growth.... Why not form a rival bloc in public? We won't roll you preemptively, I promise. Just do that, and then we can have a little competition for top dog. Eventually war will break out from that and it will be a real great war. A lot better than sitting in the darkness and lunging at us trying to put a dent in our NS, no?

Oh hey it's the guy who was talking about never giving IDIOT peace during the GENIUS war and who was advocating the use of perma ZI in TE. I miss Arctic already.

Now can you PLEASE stop just jumping the top dog and do something interesting? See my post in the Murder Inc thread for more -__-

Hopefully next round some people will drop the whole "attack whomever is winning" attitude. Seriously, create a rival bloc if you want. Find allies. But don't just attack overnight with no CB to take a pot shot at the alliance winning. At least bring the dramaz beforehand and have a 'cold war' type standoff with the guys at the top or something. Then jump on something one of their members says and attack them, or SOMETHING. All I want to see is a setup war between two factions with an actual CB, not NAAC and WAPA and xxxxx hitting #1 together at update. And yes, we do owe a great debt to our allies: The Pacific Army, Warlordz, Ubercon.... you guys rock. There are more, too, but I've just mentioned these guys because they've been with us through several conflicts. Edit: and Bama, I disagree with you on what you believe this game should be. It shouldn't be anarchy. It should be based on treaties that continue to roll over through rounds. You seem opposed to this because when it happened in CN:S any opposition began to be attacked. That's what CN:TE shouldn't be. But if people create treaties with their allies and friends, and don't take down others who want to make treaties with their friends, we can have some true great wars and standoffs. Murder Inc. and our allies have shown that we do not abuse treaties to preemptively take down any opposition. I see nothing wrong with us forming more alliances, nor do I see anything wrong with, say, NAAC and WAPA forming their own ties and challenging us.

I do too. Strange, I thought we had buried all the WAPA corpses after they retreated and surrendered

No, seriously, me stating I think a war is bad will not ruin TE. What will ruin TE is everyone going around saying "don't react like that, it's just TE lol." Trust me, we're aware it's TE. There's no need to remind us. People are free to take this as seriously as they want. Stop telling people how to play the game. THAT will kill TE if it continues.

Just checking to see if this is still the case. If your fellow genius alliances wanted out of the war I'm sure meeting with Airme could result in that. But s it is I'm seeing no attempts at peace, which is kinda contradictory to what you're saying.

You were left hung out to dry after hanging your allies out to dry and now you're complaining about it? lol, wapa.

No, you pretty obviously surrendered.

^ I love you. Edit: Well, we kinda snuck into the imperial palace and laced the brownies. Figured we'd get Airme but it was just little old FV sitting in the emperor's chair speaking as if he was controlling what was going on. He'll be waking up pretty soon now.

Thanks, Arctic. Much better than the whole ZI and disbandment your people have been saying.

You were the ones who plotted with a coalition to attack us, and considered making us disband. It was also your coalition who promised ZI for any of us who use nukes, which is going into the realm of standard CN, which is what you claim you attacked us to prevent. Because you attacked an ally of the Project. And because you were obviously scheming behind friends of friends' backs. Why wouldn't you scheme behind your friends' backs as well? Hint: they did attack you, and they did lay a finger on NAAC. I found it lulzy watching the anarchies roll in as well! You guys should have followed your treaty and attacked with PP and IDIOT against the coalition of the convenient but you didn't. Oh, please. We aren't going to refrain from using nukes - they're designed to hurt you. You brought the nukes on yourselves by attacking us. If you didn't want nuked then don't attack us, it's that simple. No, you guys are the ones who said the lulz went too far. Don't spin this one. Hint: you won't offer us terms, therefore yours are worse. Again, don't spin this. We didn't want this war, you did.

No, the 5 alliances are sanctioned. You 5 attacked us and managed to anarchy 90 of our nations in 3 days which is pitiful especially when you had the advantage of surprise and us not bulking up. Also, I can play the anarchy game too. Check out the two NAAC I attacked, both had forewarning, both were anarchied and taken out of the conflict. Despite me facing 3 opponents much stronger than I am.

Bama, you need to knock it off too. Nobody will ever play the game if all that involves is one side making an argument and the other saying "IT'S TE LOL CHILL." WE KNOW IT'S TOURNAMENT EDITION. Please let us play it the way we want and stop reminding us. And for the love of god stop cluttering threads with "but it's TE guys." WE GET THAT, STOP SAYING IT.

Pretty pathetic fighting by the coalition of the convenient there. You blindsided us with 5 alliances and only managed to get 90 anarchies in 3 nights? Might wanna work on that military of yours.