Jump to content

Ganjazistan

Members
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ganjazistan

  1. Congratulations TUF here's to two more and then two more you get the picture
  2. [quote name='Rebel Virginia' date='13 July 2010 - 11:43 PM' timestamp='1279078995' post='2370226'] [color="#0000FF"]After so many new alliances forming and claiming to be something new and special, can you really blame me for being how I am? CMEA returned from being members of the RnR, and then proceed to sign a treaty with RnR. Essentially they are just a branch of RnR right now. So, what is the point of it existing? I mean no offense. I is simply an honest observation and question.[/color] [/quote] You mean kinda like how NpO was essentially just an arm of NPO way back whenever? Honestly, don't you have anything better to do?
  3. [quote name='Ashoka the Great' date='10 July 2010 - 01:34 PM' timestamp='1278783267' post='2365949'] You know, you could have tried addressing his point, which was quite valid. CMEA [i]was[/i] unremarkable in its first iteration. Although I suppose making yourself look like a crying child works, too. [/quote] Does the fact that RV, or anyone for that matter, thinks that CMEA was "unremarkable" mean that is has no right to existence and/or rebirth? I submit that no one not named Admin has the right to make such a determination. I also suggest that RV (and his defenders) are intelligent enough to realize this. Carrying this train of thought to it's logical conclusion, it's rather obvious that all RV was doing was trying to get a reaction, commonly referred to as trolling, if I am not mistaken. Also, I can't help but wondering two things: A) What exactly would make an alliance remarkable? Is there some sort of RV chart/checklist to help us determine such things? Or is that maybe a very subjective call, depending upon each individual's motives and experiences? B) Does RV plan on informing all "unremarkable" alliances of their mediocrity, or is this reserved for the ones he has some sort of grudge against?
  4. Here's to a glorious rebirth and renaissance of the former CMEA spirit and ideals. aka woooooooooooooooooooooooooooot!!!!!
  5. [quote name='cmf0203' date='31 May 2010 - 08:16 PM' timestamp='1275351398' post='2318297'] Note: All of this was against my better judgement.[/quote] IIRC, [i]you[/i] were against my better judgment, but what the heck I've learned to live with it [quote name='theArrowheadian' date='01 June 2010 - 12:09 AM' timestamp='1275365355' post='2318639'] The lack of bourbon and myself in this topic are very disturbing. [/quote] [img]http://www.barnonedrinks.com/tips/dictionary/images/658.jpg[/img] eh, 1 out of 2
  6. Now, I wonder who wrote the above words of wisdom? And, before you start: Yeah, the quotes are taken from a blog entry of yours about bandwagoning. So, go ahead and say it's "out of context". (Oh, the irony!) Still, I find it just this side of hypocrisy that the person who wrote those words, would somehow feel justified in telling two sovereign alliances how to interpret and/or implement a treaty that precludes his even being in CN. Also, Well, at least you were in the neighborhood... The actual relevant part is Just for the hell of it, and the fact that I can't get to sleep,I not only checked our forums, and our archives, but every log of our gov channels I could find and, dang it, I just couldn't seem to find any such notice. Have a nice day, Haflinger. P.S. (way OOC) I'm curious as to why you named yourself after a semi-obscure breed of horse. Did you have one as a child or something?
  7. [quote name='blanding' date='04 May 2010 - 01:31 PM' timestamp='1272994300' post='2286523'] i got the recruitment message from WebGuest80 [size="1"]he's to awesome to have to use a real nick on IRC[/size] [/quote] I'm just blindly following my hero, blanding.
  8. Funny how many R&Rers are in here congratulating their former leader the one with "questionable loyalty". As someone else sorta pointed out, the only thing questionable about GFL is his choice of NASCAR drivers. Grats old man, well deserved.
  9. You sir/madam are so beyond clueless as to the relationship between FOK and R&R as to borderline on the utterly hilarious.
  10. NPO has had many people throughout their history that are quite competent with the English language and should have had no problem with making their terms very specific. When something is worded, "only keep enough soldiers" as opposed to ,"shall not have more than 20% soldiers", it is quite reasonable to think that maybe, just maybe it was worded that way intentionally as a loophole for redeclaration. Which is all a moot point as it is pretty obvious that the real "class" move was waiting until there were only 4 days left on the terms to enact this clause. Unless you want to try to tell us that it just wasn't noticed till then? edit:forgot a word or two
  11. Congratulations MK Why in the world would someone ask that? If they're not around, why even mention them?
  12. Dude, I don't care how many 1, 2,3, 10 nation or whatever alliances you care to join, found or merge, but please, for the love of whomever quit using bright yellow bold caps please
  13. This is the sanest thing I have read in these here forums for, well, it seems like forever.
  14. Some people in Karma complained about P/EZI for nations in PM In which case, exactly why were you !@#$%*in about it in the first place? I don't know about where you live in RL, but in an awful lot of places, threatening someone's life is punished nearly severely as actually taking it. Apparently your head trauma has left you unable to remember things in a linear manner. NPO tried curbstomping a much smaller alliance. The allies of that alliance honored their treaties, and then the blocs kicked in. Now just because yer buddies over at Pacifica actually got called out for once, doesn't mean that they weren't the aggressors. Okay mods, hit me up again, but the meter has been reached..... B U L L S H I T somehow I find this both intriguing and full of LOL I didn't realize Midgets mooed, well, maybe the trained ones do, I guess
  15. I've been finding pretty much everything said by just about everybody in NPO pretty damned hilarious lately
  16. We're Pacifican, not Polar a !@#$%* is a !@#$%* no matter which side of the street she's hooking on ahem... You Pacifican Pieces .....and so on
  17. Evidently we have failure to communicate here,My statement is this.If it takes my individual surrender to save my nation then there isn't a choice.If it takes Pacifica accepting terms that will lead to it's destruction. Then that's not much of a choice is it? But that was the purpose of these "instructions" in 1st place wasn't it? The use of peaced banks is still a viable tactic, a tactic I might add that Karma also employed. Oh will you $%&@tards just get off it. Having your entire top 100 nations in PM is not a tactic its being a bunch of !@#$%*^ $%&@ the pc crap thats what it is and you know it The top 100 didn't all start in peace they just weren't staggered very well.It happens when you have this many alliances all vying for targets, the coordination suffers.They made it to peace and will help rebuild Pacifica after the war.So you may be correct, the move is more strategic than tactical. I find it hilarious that someone from a bloc calling themselves "Karma" would be concerned if anything was too PC or not. and i find it equally hillarious that yall are getting yer asses kicked
  18. I'm sure your pants got heavier when you saw that I posted, but I'm going to try not to attack you this time around. The whole "Karma" coalition formed very quickly in comparison to power-structures like the CoLUEition. In almost a period of a month, people went from speculating that NPO would crush the opposition (with MHA, TOP, and pretty much all other non-Citadel alliances on their side), to thinking that the war would be completely even (with almost everyone except a few large alliances hitting Q), to seeing that a gangbang was in store for NPO (with MHA, TOP, and everyone in between hitting the hell out of NPO & Co.). My hindsight is very crude, and I'm sure some insiders have many corrections, but I think Pacifica's main problem was showing disrespect towards their allies and taking for granted their support. This created a building resentment toward NPO, but that resentment was hidden by their fear for Pacifican might. However, when the winds of change started to blow, the anti-NPO government members became emboldened, and the dominoes started to fall. tl;dr Pacifica pulled a Tyson they thought their badass rep was gonna be enough again
  19. As I stated a little earlier: Enough of this PC crap and attempts to reason with asshats. You Polar pieces are acting like every other two-bit bully in the history of everything ever has; once they've had their asses handed to them on a plate, that is. YER WHININ' PURE AND SIMPLE LIKE A PATHETIC LITTLE B I T C H man up and face the fact that someone finally came along that could take you
  20. Dear Nizzle, Apparently you suffered some sort of head trauma at some point in your life or it would be very, very easy for you to realize that as long as NPO nations can accept individual surrender terms there is no rational basis for any comparison for this use of reps, whether they be "fair" or not.
  21. Evidently we have failure to communicate here,My statement is this.If it takes my individual surrender to save my nation then there isn't a choice.If it takes Pacifica accepting terms that will lead to it's destruction. Then that's not much of a choice is it? But that was the purpose of these "instructions" in 1st place wasn't it? The use of peaced banks is still a viable tactic, a tactic I might add that Karma also employed. Oh will you $%&@tards just get off it. Having your entire top 100 nations in PM is not a tactic its being a bunch of !@#$%*^ $%&@ the pc crap thats what it is and you know it
  22. especially diarrhea of the mind, no doubt
  23. this is to neither confirm or deny that I am neither starting or spreading any rumours about anyone that calls themselves Schills or any variation thereof
×
×
  • Create New...