Jump to content

Chairman Cao

Members
  • Posts

    233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    Nottingham, UK

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Airstrip Two
  • Alliance Name
    Poison Clan
  • Resource 1
    Water
  • Resource 2
    Oil

Chairman Cao's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I'm sure Slayer will be back in a month, after realising all the rage and bitterness has left him with nothing else in life.
  2. I don't see those as harsh terms, nor do I see it as cheap for GOD to have directly messaged the membership. They probably did this in the belief that many Echelon, some of whom would by now desparately want surrender, would never otherwise hear about the offer their own gov is refusing. Fight on or surrender either is fine, but there's nothing low about GODs actions.
  3. I doubt he minds it somehow. The enemies with several thousand tech and a WRC are the really scary ones, and by the time they're down to 1k infra you can barely do any real damage to them either, while they can take 350+ infra and land easily. Warchests can't last forever though, at least I hope so!
  4. You can however give a defeat alert if they have no soldiers at all, then get 2 ground attacks in later when they rebuy. But the DA must be first, not after the GAs.
  5. I wasn't suggesting that you couldn't have hurt us back then. But you know as well as I do that if it had just been the two our alliances, despite the massive size difference, we would gladly have fought you to the death. Perhaps there will be a round 2 (hope I have a FAFB by then too).
  6. I haven't noticed it say razed at all tbh. I keep battle logs and this is the difference between the two situations.
  7. TPF backed up by most of the alliances who are now on the losing side of the current war? Indeed.
  8. Give it a try and see how well you fare
  9. It's a raid so indeed I will choose an easy target when there are many available - raids are meant to be profitable. If my target wishes to fight back I'm already in a nuclear war with 2 other nations so he shouldn't have too hard a time. Many people here are simply interested in attacking our tech raiding itself. While you're perfectly free to do this, it's a separate issue and not what this thread was about. If our actions towards California were anything more than a raid we wouldn't have limited attacks to GAs and offered peace immediately. This should be evident.
  10. Because their top 5 nations have a whole 25 nukes total on top of a formidable 0 WRC, 0 AADN and 2 FAB! Damn right, we wouldn't dare touch that.
  11. There is a balance imo, and I believe that the majority of alliance surrender too soon. While it's true that there is little point taking everybody to ZI since you're better off rebuilding without crippling yourself first to fight another day; the alliances who surrender very early on only lose respect and credibility as a result. While it's one thing to surrender early if choosing to enter through optional treaty obligations, if a powerful alliance surrenders very early on they only show themselves to be largely irrelavent. No matter how powerful an alliance is statistically, if they're not going to follow through on a war because of fear of losing some of those statistics, then they aren't really much threat at all.
  12. Thus supporting Syrik's point. This is a raid. It is not a spiteful attack on TPF. TPF is giving us a good war for the most part and I hope it keeps up.
×
×
  • Create New...