Feustel

I have wheat and uranium. Any team.

Team: Aqua Nation Name: Sarcastopia National Leader: Feustel Link to Nation: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=238577 Your Resources: lead, sugar Needed Resources: marble, pigs, water, wheat PM asap if interested. Hoping to keep trades longterm.

I'm looking for a good trade circle, preferably black team. I have silver and oil. Or if you are looking for silver and oil and have any pair of the following: aluminum fish iron lumber drop me a pm in game. Here's my card. http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_...tion_ID=1000024

Right you are. I read the table in the Information Index incorrectly. But regardless, I'm still curious about whether or not "military" is being used as an umbrella term. Sorry for the mix-up.

One of the benefits for choosing to have a monarchy is -2% on military upkeep. I am looking for clarification on what is covered by "military." Is it everything military? Soldiers, tanks, planes, missiles, etc... or just soldiers? I want to be informed before switching governments. Thanks in advance.

Thank you foxodi and dealmaster 13! That explains it. Since he's innactive he should be off the charts in a few days anyway. I just thought I'd sweep up some tech before that happened. Haha.. joke's on me. >.<

I've attacked a nation and all my battle reports tell me that I've destroyed tech. Can tech not be captured in tournament edition? The same goes for cash. It says I've destroyed it. Maybe I just totally missed something in the rules and sound like a noob, but either way, I'd like an explanation. (Because if tech raids don't exist, I just sent an embarrassing PM to someone. lol...)

The alliance ZYX is looking for new recruits. What's not to like about an alliance that looks like an acronym?

I considered posting the image of the PM but I am new to the forums (though not the game) and I was not sure if that was acceptable. Thank you for clarifying that for me. Here is what I hope is a reasonable screenshot. (I cropped out a good portion just to get the point across. If a wider shot is needed, just say so.)

The Superfriends alliance must tolerate every member, regardless of alliance affilation. When trying to recruit a fellow maroon nation to my alliance, I recieved the following message in a PM from a Superfriends nation that I will not name: "maroon belongs to the superfriends gtfo" This is tournament edition. Individual nation strength should be the focus anyway. I am for the advancement of all maroon team nations without the dominance of a single alliance. After all, many newcomers will not be familiar with the stronger alliances that are reforming from the previous round.

I have returned to the next round of CN: Tournament Edition and I want to establish myself as a strong member of the maroon team and its senate. Vote for me to keep the Superfriends alliance from dominating the maroon trading sphere. Feustel of Sarcastopia and (CN:TE) Pangio ZYX Alliance