Jump to content

White Chocolate

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,203

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by White Chocolate

  4. A Post Grunge Acceptance Speech

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    On 3/16/2024 at 11:22 AM, Sarkin said:

    Shout-out to Serb and Solo for their work to grow the alliance!

     

    But, even more importantly: what does this mean for the future of Argent relevancy? 

    Argent shall always be relevant.

     

    Congratulations PGS!

    11 hours ago, Sabcat said:

    Here's one now, all salty and serious. Bless. 

    Now can you get a good swear a second time?  That’s the real test.  

  9. NATO hereby declares war on...

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by White Chocolate
    Add URL

    On 12/19/2023 at 6:40 PM, firingline said:

     

    And you apparently define "making a move" as doing absolutely nothing.

     

    I’m simply agreeing with this person named Firingline when he listed GATO as one of the “Winners” in this other thread.  It was a good point about GATO.    Maybe you’ve heard of him.  I normally think he’s full of crap but there are exceptions.  

     

  11. NATO hereby declares war on...

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    19 hours ago, firingline said:

     

    I don't know which part of this is funnier:

    1) Openly admitting to plotting against and breaking a treaty with your ally TW

    2) Claiming that coming "very, very close to war" is making the most recent move lmao.

     

    I'm also not quite sure what being in government has to do with knowing what happens in CN. Certainly you've been around long enough to know that's not how any of this works?

    1.  CLAWS did not break any treaties with any ally.  We did not plot against an ally either.  This includes TW.  CLAWS made it very clear that we would not agree to any attacks on TW.  I’m not surprised though, that you brought that up.  It’s something you will harp on anytime you can fit it into a response to me for a long time.  
     

    2. I disagree.  GATO wanted something and made it clear that they were willing to go war to get it.  Instead they ended up getting what they wanted.  Not only did they make a move, they got what they wanted as a result.  Not only is that a “move” - that’s a win.  
     

    Unless by “move” you mean start a war just to start a war.  If that’s the case, lmao!
     

     

  12. NATO hereby declares war on...

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    12 hours ago, firingline said:

     

    I thought we've discussed this. RFI is free to make a move any time they want. Come on, make the OWF more lively. It's most certainly your turn to do something!

    RFI, and GATO in particular, made the most recent “move.”  We came very, very close to war over it.  GATO got what they wanted and so the war did not happen.  Not every “move” results in war.
     

    Of course, not being in government you would not know.  I’m not being critical of your point.  However, now that you do know I’m sure you’ll move on and find some other reason to !@#$%* and moan.  Enjoy.  

  15. ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER: Brown BUTT Sewage Continues to Flow into the Once-Pristine NG Reservoir

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    On 9/1/2023 at 9:30 PM, KameraadLenin said:


    Non Grata declares war on UCR in defence of MONGOLS

    signed,
    Lyanna, Sugar & Violence
    Kerschbs, The Nice One
    Lenin, The Milkman
    Erwin Schrodinger, Schrothodoxy Patriarch
    weebl, Concentrate and Ask Again
    Rhizoctonia, RON Steel Ballz
    Caustic, Pope of Non Grata
    Stewie, God-Emperor


     

    Well now, I guess the Union of Communists Republics are actually winning their war.   After all, why would the mighty Non Grata need to bother rescuing their ally from UCR?

     

    Who knew?!

     

     

  16. Holy Order of Darkness (Now Kentucky Bois) Declaration of War

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    On 8/15/2023 at 9:18 PM, BigChungus69 said:

    I understand that you are questioning whether you should feel sympathy or amusement towards the situation you described. In regard to fixing your grammar, I would suggest revising your sentence to something like, "I am unsure whether to feel empathy for these individuals or to find humor in their audacious declaration of war." Remember to always proofread your writing to ensure proper grammar and clarity before making a fool of yourself. 

    Looks like you’ll fit in well with the usual OWF clique.  

  17. Alliance War Resignations/Surrenders

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    13 hours ago, Sabcat said:



    I reserve the right, of course, to drop back onto the LSF, or any other AA of my choosing, and hit the peace mode hugger occupying The Wolves top spot and smash him up for a round or 2.

    This is not a surrender.  Do it right, please…

    12 hours ago, firingline said:

     

    Actually, no, you don't. You've surrendered, and you're out of the war.

     

    Have a nice day.

    I hate being put in the position where I end up having to agree in public with firingline.  

  18. UCR Declaration of War

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, firingline said:

    .

     

    Frankly, out of respect for Al, I don't think we need to continue this conversation that really started before I was a member here. I wish we had this conversation before I joined TW, but since you just now decided to try to call me out I figured I need to at least respond. In the interest of not causing Bundy any headaches, please feel free to DM me on discord if you have any further concerns as I won't be responding publicly on this issue.

    This is the most intelligent comment I’ve heard regarding our relationship in a very long time.  

  19. UCR Declaration of War

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    1 hour ago, firingline said:

     

    You have a direct defensive treaty with an alliance that was attacked (The Wolves), and a defensive treaty with an alliance that has a defensive treaty with an alliance that launched an attack.

     

    These two things are not the same. They're not even close.

     

    CLAWS is a bad ally, in part, because of what you highlighted. With so many treaties, CLAWS is a couple of degrees of separation from virtually every alliance. This makes them a poor ally, because they will always play the neutrality card when tough choices need to be made. Your tangled FA makes letting down your allies predictable, and it's something every ally or potential ally should be considering.

     

     

    We have an optional defense/optional aggression treaty with The Wolves.  They decide to raid another alliance, which is their right and I can respect it.  However, even IF there were no other relations between CLAWS and GATO, CLAWS could say "happy hunting" and be 100% within what is required of our treaty.  Tech raiding involves risk and tech raiding alliances one knows are allied with others is something that both Al and I are familiar with enough to know the risks.  This is an entirely different situation from @AL Bundy raiding some random nation and discovering later that UCR secretly protects them.  

     

    I've know Al from before I had any clue of your existence.  We are both well aware of each others positions.  Al has not expressed any concerns to me about CLAWS response.  I am sure if he had an issue, he would have expressed it to me or @Tevron LONG before you decided to bandwagon in this war via asking permission from Al to join his alliance.  

     

    We all get that you supposedly do not like CLAWS, but apparently you are more than happy to complain about us not coming to your rescue now that you are involved directly.  I find that fact rather satisfying. 

     

    I have a great deal of respect for Al and his willingness to make his own rules.  You don't get the same respect, though.  Where were you when this started?  You were safe and sound in NATO, that is where.  As far as I am concerned, you should consider yourself lucky that Al even allowed you to bandwagon into this war via joining his alliance.  As much as you pretend otherwise, if you did not want to take advantage of the provisions of The Wolves - CLAWS  treaty and our extended relationship beyond that, you could have just left NATO and joined the fight from your own alliance.  Since you did not chose to do that, you clearly see an advantage to the allies Al has and, knowing you, I highly doubt it's the Non Grata connection that you like.

     

     

  20. UCR Declaration of War

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    On 5/27/2023 at 7:46 PM, firingline said:

     

    That would require CLAWS to be a good ally - and we all know that's not the case.

     

    God. GATO is our only hope...

    Wolves leadership (hi Al @AL Bundy) were very well aware of our ties to GATO and also GATO’s brown team treaty.  Al may not like politics, but (unlike you apparently) Al understands them and understands how the decisions he makes effect them.  It’s about communication.  We are good allies to each other because we communicate well.  
     

    CLAWS is a fine ally to Wolves and GATO and our other ally as well.  
     

    Now that you are in an alliance allied again to CLAWS FL, feel free to being any further concerns to your leadership.  I am sure Al will give them exactly the attention they deserve.  

  24. You’re (Not) Invited to The Cookout

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Just make sure the fire you all are using to grill your meat does not burn down any of the homes in my neighborhood.  If they are not one of CLAWS neighbors, I'm really not concerned.  

     

    If we chose to crash your party, we will bring our own grill and lighter.  

     

    I know better than to ask that the noise be kept to reasonable hours, so I'll just invest in a good pair of earplugs.  

×
×
  • Create New...