Jump to content

Fyfe XIV

Banned
  • Posts

    869
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fyfe XIV

  1. I just read this again and almost threw up in my mouth
  2. [quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1301683998' post='2682344'] Only the fact that it's April Fools Day gives me any comfort at seeing this. [/quote] Posted at any time of the year, this makes me question the direction of humanity.
  3. [img]http://i.imgur.com/BtNBg.gif[/img] Oh, ho ho ho.
  4. [quote name='Arrnea' timestamp='1301678885' post='2682279'] How could you say such a thing about your bloc mate: [center][img]http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/607/sig4sos.png[/img][/center] [/quote] We may need to re-evaluate your membership... just as soon as we finish deciding about UPN. Edit: i'd add the UPN CnG sig but I can't find it D:
  5. My first reaction to this: OH MAN, OH GOD, OH MAN, OH GOD, OH MAN, OH GOD, OH MAN This is absolutely horrifying.
  6. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1301619640' post='2681764'] TBF, the war itself was Godwin'd long ago. [/quote] True true. I'm just surprised it didn't come out in propaganda sooner
  7. Did it really take 103 pages to get Godwin'd?
  8. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1301583192' post='2681413'] Or if anyone bothered to read the nice, easily paste-able bit I put in my forum AA field, SOS団. That said I do get a good laugh at all the people with this inexplicable hated for Sultans of Swing. Silly as GOONs. [/quote] Easily amused I see. How about SOS
  9. NOM^5 and timeline are not terrible posters and accurate representatives of ODN~
  10. Ahh his last poll. [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1301551492' post='2681266'] RV won without a shot fired. [/quote] Gah you beat me to it.
  11. [quote name='Craven' timestamp='1301534674' post='2681043'] I wasn't going to say anything and after further reading.. it appears the words have already been said. I really don't see why this had to be posted.. if you wanted him gone.. see to it.. don't bring up ancient history and try to make us all feel bad for you. Surely, you've got enough pitchforks and torches of your own without having to recruit the rest of us for this grudge.. [/quote] Hey buddy, maybe if you'd read the OP you'd realize that this was posted so people would stop asking about it. Too much to expect?
  12. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1301522189' post='2680895'] He used to be yours? Heh. We kicked him out a while ago; would we have gotten the same ultimatum from you now if we hadn't done so long ago? [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/PYU3Q.gif[/IMG] [/quote] IMO being in SoS is punishment enough [img]http://i.imgur.com/PYU3Q.gif[/img]
  13. [quote name='White Chocolate' timestamp='1301477981' post='2680567'] In other words, the implication I'm reading from this post is it's happening now because he's not as protected as he was while in TOP - aka: we can do this because we're bigger than the alliance he is in and "might makes right." Correct me if I'm wrong. [/quote] You are wrong. He left TOP in peace mode and did not come out until an alliance had accepted him. We were notified as soon as he was expelled from TOP and he was put on our ZI list. During that time he applied to multiple alliances and each time we approached gov of that alliance and explained that he was on our ZI list and that if he came out of peace mode we would carry out his sentence. I can assure you that no matter who he tried to join we would have done the same thing. Technically we attacked him while he was in an alliance but only because of... well, peace mode.
  14. [quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1301449617' post='2680327'] You. Want. A. Coward. For. A. Leader. ? [/quote] Panfilo was not our leader. He was high gov but not in charge.
  15. [quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1301449273' post='2680317'] And he clearly did not have the same interests as these of his membership. So he left and allowed an individual who was more in touch with the membership's needs to take over. What would you rather have, a leader who does not support the actions of his or her alliance yet remains in a leadership role or a leader who steps down and allows a member who does support the actions and interests of the alliance to take over? [/quote] We. Were. At. War. If he had stepped down it would have been one thing but he [i]left[/i].
  16. [quote name='Muddog' timestamp='1301444545' post='2680270'] I suppose everyone is entitled to their opinion, being a low man on the totem pole my opinion doesn't count for much. I can respect where Athens is coming from IC. I don't agree with exacting a 2 year old grudge, but had it stayed IC I wouldn't have felt compelled to post. Regardless of who they are, what they have or have not done, or what you think of them, everyone has value. To assume other wise is to devalue the human life and time that was placed into the nation and RP character. [b]If this individual was so worthless than why was he high ranking Athens Gov, why did you consider him so close[/b], why did his leaving burn such a deep hate into you that it is no longer about the game and becomes more about settling a personal vendetta via the game. I have a great deal of respect for Athens, its really to bad that this couldn't just stay IC, but had to become a personal attack against a member of this community. [/quote] Because he hadn't shown us his true colors yet. As for personal vendetta, if it makes you feel better, think of our single ZI sentence (thats all we sentenced) as him paying what he owed. It was not our intention to drive him from the game, that is completely up to him. Any opinions that we're better off without him are just that, personal opinions, and are not what Athens as an IC entity believes.
  17. One of my favorite parts of these tournaments are the people that come and QQ about it being biased.
  18. edit: poorly worded. I'll fix this later maybe.
  19. [quote name='Mayzie' timestamp='1301412317' post='2679953'] Where has anything I've brought up been explained? I've not once questioned the ZI sentence, which was explained in the OP here, just pointed out that the way you've gone about it is cowardly. Waiting two years for him to move into an alliance you were in a position to push around. Of course it was [i]non-negotiable[/i], AB and their allies are in no position to refuse your demands. When he applied to join TOP or whatever alliance it was he joined when he left Athens, where was this 'non-negotiable' attitude? [/quote] Well I can't help that you have a terrible definition of cowardly. We made it clear almost as soon as Panfilo was kicked out of TOP that we would be pursuing a ZI sentence as soon as he left peace mode. [i]We did not wait for him to move into an alliance weaker than ours, we waited for him to not be in an alliance.[/i] The only reason he was able to apply to an alliance was the fact that he was in peace mode. He tried with Exodus, SUN and AB (maybe more) and each time, we approached their gov and explained our position. There were few problems (PMoses lol) and for the most part, Panfilo consistently lied on his applications. His exodus one was particularly funny. Well you see, after he left Athens we were busy [b]fighting a war[/b]. Not to mention that at the time Athens was around 500k ns (or something like that) as this was pre-mergermania.
  20. [quote name='Mayzie' timestamp='1301400349' post='2679870'] Sounds to me like Athens are as cowardly as Panfilo himself if they've got to wait two years before even approaching an alliance about this ZI sentence they've held over someone's head. Even then they had to wait for him to join an alliance who weren't in the most politically strong position and had just come out of a war. Should've told them to $%&@ off AB, they had their chance two years ago. It wouldn't have been too difficult for them to contact whatever alliance he applied to, explain that he's a former government member of the alliance and is being sentenced for desertion. [/quote] Hey look! You don't know what happened even though it's been explained numerous times Also, its a good thing AB did what they did because we would have pursued him anyways. You could say it was [i]non-negotiable[/i]. [quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1301398648' post='2679860'] I thought membership within an alliance was a [i]choice[/i]? If you don't like the alliance then you leave. Pretty simple stuff. [/quote] So if what you're saying is correct, Pacifica is alright with its members leaving during wartime? Something tells me that isn't true.
  21. [quote name='New Frontier' timestamp='1301372411' post='2679678'] The pathetic thing is that you're probably still one of the twenty best alliances on your side. [/quote] Ugh I hate when you're right I always mix you up with WarriorConcepts old alliance. Meh.
  22. [quote name='Wu Tang Clan' timestamp='1301376151' post='2679714'] I say that to get to this. I firmly believe Athens has/had every right to seek vengeance on the traitorous acts of a former government member. I believe that ZI, in this case, was a warranted course of action. And, I would never tell an alliance how to run their business, especially a fine establishment such as Athens. That being said, I wish there was some sort of alternative solution, because I do think Panfilo could become a respectable member given the right conditions (admittedly, Exodus did not provide those conditions at the time, or now). And, if this does lead to the departure of another experienced member from our humble planet, I disagree with the previous posters, as I believe something of value will be lost. In a state of dwindling numbers, one lost is too many lost, if we have the chance to change it. [/quote] We merely wanted Panfilo to pay his debt to Athens and he has. A single ZI sentence is by no means driving him from the game and I don't see an alternative solution being necessary. If his response to facing the loss of his 10k precious infra is to sell said infra, delete his wonders and insult us in his native language in his bio then I question whether he can actually change. His response has been downright childish and I believe that people like him contribute nothing to this game other than as a statistic. I do respect you and your opinion and I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. He wasn't even good at war when he tried to fight [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1301379139' post='2679745'] have fun panfilo [/quote] It seems like he not agree with fun either http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=123271
  23. [quote name='ace072199' timestamp='1301369495' post='2679646'] I understand your anger & Frustration over this, I really do. I just think after all this time has passed that you would be over it. Panfilo I am sure, (by looking at his nation) is leaving the game. So it is finally over, I hope after holding a grudge this long you guys finally got some relief out of this. I will say Panfilo, assured me that he wanted to rebuild his reputation. He assured me that he was going to Fight beside us if we needed him to. I also would like to add how funny it is that you didn't attack him while he was in TOP, but he joins a smaller alliance and it is not negotiable. [/quote] Yeah well he also lied on multiple applications after being kicked out of an alliance for refusing to fight. Words are easy to say. If all Schatt has are his usual chowderheaded comments then we're good to go.
  24. I'm going to go ahead and agree with Rush here, there is absolutely nothing wrong with driving Mr. NOT AGREE WITH THIS WAR out of here. Its also interesting how few people understand the concept of non-negotiable. o/ Panfilo at ZI
×
×
  • Create New...