Deimos27

April 27th then please, and thanks, SCY

April 9th please SCY.

Gratz xoin, I'm going to second WANA's words on this one. Really liked you while on BM. o/

Good stuff The Combine, glad to see this.

Fun fight with NG. Good to see this.

This is pretty freaking awesome

[quote name='Sunny Side King' timestamp='1341613910' post='3005148'] We've already cut you guys in half in two weeks. Your aren't gonna last very long little boy. [/quote] Oh big talk, especially considering your numbers and lower tier performance. I'm enjoying the nice war banter chee78 is providing, and he's the first competent NGer I fight this war after blowing a hole through the previous two. Shout out to him, and I hope your sorry !@#$ talking here doesn't obfuscate his good impression.

Nice job with the chart, quality stuff. lol @Greek RP Guy

[quote name='ni431' timestamp='1340683346' post='2996561'] the guy has 1700 ns, also he has 67 day Alliance Seniority 67 Days. [/quote] Can you read? He bulked up out of the blue. Hope to have a good battle NG. In fact, already am. See ya on the field.

It would probably be better for everyone including you if you took some time out of this game and rerolled later. I'm not even being mean or anything here.

Bahaha I see what you did there

Regardless of Dave War being forced hard, the DEFCON 3 thing was pretty funny.

Gotta hand it to you for finally starting up the fun part again MK

Stop making sense jerdge

Even so, Sigrun, conflict is doomed to arise. How would you solve it after prevention failed?

I believe the generally accepted interpretation of Scenario 1 is for the treatied alliance(s) to fight for the duration of the conflict - the treaty is still in effect during the cancellation period, meaning it is activated and all its effects applied regardless of the cancellation period expiring. So the obligation would kind of get extended until the conflict ends. Keep in mind however, CN is much more a social than a political game. That and the fact we have no world authority or limitations (like the UN) means treaty interpretations will vary wildly, with moral condemnations and backroom deals developing beyond the text. Though some things are more or less frowned upon universally at least on the surface (bandwagoning, spying, etc), those are purely moral sanctions. Intelligence clauses like in Scenario 2 would likely fall too deep into that subjectivity and vary too much from alliance to alliance for a definite answer that emcompasses generally accepted customs. But really I don't know, I've never been high gov, just a regular grunt. Keep in mind these are amateur impressions like yours, people who are actually in high gov and make this game actually work would answer more precisely.

Bahaha these are some tasty reactions. Welcome Sovrana.

Glad to see this, all the best to IRON and much love still. Also break it up you two.

[quote name='VictorR' timestamp='1333294251' post='2946729'] This war is just my units getting wiped out then reconstituted. Their units get wipes out and get reconstituted. Then back again tomorrow for more of the same. Boring. [/quote] History of CN

Jurassic Park guy made this worth it. Wait no, it didn't. Almost though.

[quote name='Megamind' timestamp='1329965840' post='2926106'] Just got this from an NpO member I've been trading with for ~3 years Guess some people aren't ready to give up the grudge [/quote] Haha, well that's bad timing.

Good fight Polar.

Much love to GLoF, they've been instrumental in this front. Good to see you guys had fun. Congratulations STA, well fought.

Thank goodness. All the best to Van Hoo and KaitlinK.

Good fight, CCC was quite pleasant. Godspeed.