SirWilliam

Regardless of AA, and regardless of any futile efforts on behalf of alliance leadership to get them to peace out, as soon as a slot of mine opens I will be declaring on some of the boogers still attacking you (assuming they're in range of course). )): UW )): )): NAAW )):

You've picked a fine bunch to treaty with, TSI. Congrats to both.

I've heard some nasty things about Athens. BEWARE. And by that I mean congratulations to both parties. I hope the relationship goes well.

We'll kindly piss off once we've had our fill of your delicious tech and land.

Our actions are similar in both games though, which was my point. In both CNTE and CNS we honor treaties, regardless of convenience or the odds.

By the way, to you know who, don't even think of doing you know what to the Mushroom Kingdom. We're not insane but we do have cruise missiles.

Sitting on the sidelines is no fun though.

Are all GW1 vets so tactless? (This is a rhetorical question by the way.) Am I the only one who finds it laughable that the integrity of C&G members in honoring treaties is being questioned here? Some people must not have been paying much attention to CNS the last year or so. And yeah, the desire to kill played partly into the decision to engage TPF. Welcome to CNTE.

Pandas defy sense.

Ok. Thanks for the heads up.

Meh.

Good work, cheerio.

TPF, you're right about one thing - CNTE is beginning to resemble CNS a bit. Not because reckless alliances often get dog-piled in lop-sided wars, but because reckless alliances often get dog-piled in lop-sided wars as a result of their actions and this leads to complaining and speculation on their behalf. If you're bitter or otherwise displeased by present circumstances than I'd suggest doing a better job selecting your allies next round, and doing a much better job not making enemies.

I like killing and looting. And there's much killing and looting to be done to TPF. Therefore I support this war. To the battlefield, again. o7

Since when? Entertaining read, by the way. After getting through the first two pages my mind has been adequately blown for the day.

This thread makes my head hurt. & OSNAP, elborrador is laying down the law. Be scared.

Which is it? My whole point in briefly mentioning CE-TPF's previous war and posting here was not to address the CB or to comment on how TPF was stomped, but to point out that these attacks are clearly personal. You've explicitly said so yourself (even if you've gone back on it), and you brought up and discussed at length the perceived injustices TPF faced in that war. Which is fine - I'd likely be a bit bitter too. But lets not sugar-coat things here.

Burning Glory, it sure didn't take all that long for you to come out with it and admit that your actions and the actions of your alliance in constantly raiding CE nations is personal (seeing as how CE stomped you guys earlier in the round for attempting to recruit our dear Archon), and are not merely isolated raids. It's just a bit of a bummer that you couldn't have sought your revenge when CE was still active and actively playing. Oh well though, I'm not too surprised.

Threatening the person with the ability to sanction was a far worse idea.

Please forgive my ignorance, but to clarify, who exactly constitutes Murder Inc.'s allies?

If that vague statement were to constitute a TPA DoW, I would say with confidence that it was the poorest, slowest executed offensive possible.

Dearest Pacificans, you should have just voted for our beloved Senator - doing so would have saved your precious pixels.

/me eagerly awaits a response from Ante and the Committee.

Damn. How'd I miss that?

You missed one (emphasis added): Otherwise, happy hunting.