Kahnite

Love you guys and I especially love your sig! Best war sig yet.

They talk about lists? With this latest example of thuggery they sure have made a lot of people's lists. "That's a bingo!"

It would do well that all those not currently involved in this conflict heed the call. The jackbooted thugs are at the door, "How will you meet them?" Will it be with comrades in arms in the light of freedom, or will you be hunted down individually in the darkness of tyranny? To arms, to arms, the enemy is at the gates! Hail CoJ!

Nice taunt, Very respectful. I await my impending doom with a smile.

All this double talk and twisting of facts ... The indisputable fact is that no recent recruit to any alliance in CN would have access to the information in the screenshots. I think this is a fact that everyone can agree on, no?

[quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1293776615' post='2559042'] Do we have like bacon scented cologne and nobody told me or something? [/quote] O' there are sooooo many ways to play this line, my imagination can barely grasp. Thank you, so very, very much. You can be my straight man any day!

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1293568321' post='2556433'] Hegemony wasnt a bloc or war coalition. Its the dominant power group at any given time. Noun 1. hegemony - the dominance or leadership of one social group or nation over others; [/quote] Better correct the CN Wiki then: [url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/The_Hegemony_%28Power_Sphere%29"]http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/The_Hegemony_%28Power_Sphere%29[/url]

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1293362667' post='2554300'] Call it a day NEW. ... hegemonic allies ... middle of the hegemony ... middle of the hegemony ... hegemony ... hegemonic ... etc. [/quote] Thanks for the laugh. You do realize that their present "allies" fought for Karma, not the Hegemony. Brave new world baby, need to catch up with the times.

[quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1293553458' post='2556237'] I agree with you for the most part (encouraging their members to volunteer would also be crossing the line). However, I can also see a scenario where if Fark wanted to use the PC mercenaries as a CB against PC, particularly if PC copped an attitude about it when confronted with the issue, then that would be have equal validity. There's a reason why alliances discourage members from playing mercenary--aside from potential member loss, there is the absolutely awkward position it places the alliance government. [/quote] Chairman, fact is pretty much as Daeryon glibly described it, it might put the alliance in a bad position (if it were a significant percentage of members), but unless the alliance that was the source of the mercs officially endorsed the action, holding said alliance responsible for what their members do after they leave is completely irrational.

[quote name='MrMuz' timestamp='1293517373' post='2556023'] However, with the recent war, some alliances have been doing actions that do more damage .... Does mass ghosting an alliance count as valid war help? You can clearly see people leaving some alliances to fight for others (without outright declaring war). How far could this tactic be pushed? Someone could shove most of their alliance into another AA without openly declaring war. [/quote] Where have you been? Mercenaries have been a part of CN since I joined 1 1/2 years ago. From my past experience, most are not "ghosting", but have actually joined the alliance they fight for on a temporary basis. To be perfectly blunt, I see no practical way to stop it without causing massive headaches for the admins.

[size="4"]Merry X-mas[/size] [img]http://www.nationalreview.com/sites/default/files/nfs/uploaded/u12/ITS%20A%20TARP.jpg[/img] [img]http://lolfed.com/wp-content/its-a-tarp-fed.jpg[/img]

[quote name='SF Austin' timestamp='1292731314' post='2543700'] No Nordreich Member is to post in this thread other then the monarchy and myself. [/quote] WOW! Sieg ... o forget it.

Any alliance but those listed. Just look at how PB sidestepped this latest international incident.

The "He's My Brother" war, in honor of those teams on both sides that have shown solidarity with their comrades. Without these dedicated folks we never would have gone global.

[quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1292189118' post='2537588'] your a flippen idiot look at my AAs position on the web ... (remainder deleted keep the intelligent from having to reread this doofus) [/quote] Boy, you really that insecure. I have never see so much stupidity and arrogance contained in one fool. Truly amazing. [img]http://files.sharenator.com/epic_fail3_Epic_Fails-s580x456-48809.jpg[/img]

[quote name='Mixoux' timestamp='1292183138' post='2537492'] It's so funny to see people try and defend the argument that "well it was your responsibility to demask him, so it's your fault". Heaven forbid they ever have a masking incident on their forums and end up having someone compromise information from them. I'll be waiting to see that happen. [/quote] You, like several others, are not reading the entire responses by most reasonable folks, which is in summary. "WasDrogan did do wrong, but VE (specifically the person that's in charge of opsec) was also at fault for not updating security protocols to prevent such a breach from happening in the first place." What I find funny in the whole affair are the excuses, some rather arrogant, given to defend such an oversight. God forbid that anything should detract from the frenetic declaration of jihad on what was described as a "third rate blue alliance". I speculate that most reasonable heads here on both sides will agree that if proper opsec had been followed, this never would have happened, and none of us would be here debating this point.

[quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1292164923' post='2537322'] OH NOES he has broken out big words i guess I is wrong now. Yes the person who left the mask is wrong and made a mistake ive said that earlier but Was KNOWINGLY committed a crime. Please leave your doors unlocked so i can come by and steal your crap out of your house then blame you for it. Your logic is fail you are epic fail. [/quote] The only fail is between your ears. THAT'S PRECISELY WHY I DO LOCK MY DOORS, SO MORONS LIKE YOU DON'T GET IN. Stupidest argument ever! [img]http://files.sharenator.com/car_fail_Fail-s461x404-10293-580.jpg[/img]

[quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1292090199' post='2536527'] My roomate moves out and no longer lives at my place and forgets to give me his/her key back. 6 months later he/she comes in to my house and digs around and that is my fault. Should i have changed the lock considering there was a key out there probably but as my ex roomate was a friend should i have worried about it. Im just saying that is one of the most stupidest arguments ive seen there. Im sorry officer but the bank door was open so i just went in and helped myself. There is right and wrong and if Was crossed that line he needs to be accountable. Yes the security guy screwed the pooch here but just because he made a mistake does not justify someone crossing the line and entering areas they shouldnt have been in. delta [/quote] It's called shared culpability, happens every day. Yes it [b]is[/b] your fault for not changing the locks just as its his fault for walking in. Epic fail dude.

[quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1292089653' post='2536513'] Keep reading i said that in a later post. But it still doesnt condone entering member only areas when one has resigned. [/quote] Ahh! So that excuses the security chief's lapse of judgment because someone took advantage of it. Now I understand.

[quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1292088232' post='2536479'] 1) Ok they made a clerical error [/quote] "Clerical Error"! People usually get fired for this in a western democracy, shot they reside in a democratic republic.

[quote name='Il Impero Romano' timestamp='1292055376' post='2536225'] Hey, if they were unsubstantiated, we wouldn't be here now would we? Nothing personal, this is just the kind of thing that happens when you [u]intentionally retrieve information via a medium which you have no right to use[/u], then disclose that information to third parties. [/quote] Damn him for using the internet! I guess this means we're all guilty, including yourself. Seriously, if the "info" itself (not the medium) was something this guy was not privy to, and a protection measure was not purposely compromised, I would be shooting your opsec chief, or at the very least demoting him/her.

BTW: Welcome back.

[quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1291869758' post='2534599'] A little late to the party? This issue was resolved weeks ago. [/quote] I'm always late!

Don't feed the troll!

[quote name='der_ko' timestamp='1289684790' post='2512156'] While the Kingdom does not participate in any form of extortion, we are confident any issues will be hammered out in a satisfying manner for all involved parties and in the end justice will prevail. [/quote] Can I have this engraved and mounted on my wall?