Jump to content

Bob

Members
  • Posts

    4,323
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bob

  1. 47 minutes ago, berbers said:

     

    So you were considering dropping Occulus with NpO, did you let the rest of Occulus know about these discussions, considering intel clauses are so important?

     

    Did DT know NpO was planning on hitting their allies, did that intel clause get used?

     

    Inquiring minds would like to know...

     

    NpO/NPO can think about leaving Oculus just like we can at any point. We've had a number of conversations with both of late.

     

    Doom can ask me privately if they want an answer to that question.  Don't see any purpose to sharing our internal bloc communications in a public setting.

  2. Just now, Johnny Apocalypse said:

     

    Its just quite a forceful clarification is all, I'm sure they're deeply sorry if any egos were wounded due to the omission of Dark Temple's name and association with you guys in the OP.

    Happy we are all acknowledging that NATO and FTW attacked DT in addition.  Unfortunately without any wars, but to each their own!

  3.  

    2 minutes ago, mrmarx said:

    You are literally fighting for the right of nations to be allowed to attack whoever they want with no consequences whatsoever. You are a hypocrite and a liar. 

     

    Selective enforcement, only against those who you perceived to be weak.  Unfortunate for you that wasn't the case.

     

    It's a shame the rest of UCR gets dragged into your mess.  Seem like a nice group of people.

  4. It brings me great pleasure to announce the following:

     

    ImperialFlag.pngFlag_of_The_Dark_Templar_zpsmku90sje.jpg

     

     

    Holed up in the Dark Pacific Accords

     
    §1 The New Pacific Order and the Dark Templar met one day (which was actually late at night) at a LAN party. They found out that they fit well together, and decided to play some more.
     
    §2 The signatories agree to tell each other about any cool new games they hear of that the other might like, or if someone is plotting to steal their games.
     
    §3 The parties agree that they will trade cool hats and weapons with each other if they want to.
     
    §4 If someone tries to pry either party away from their screen with talk about “getting some sunlight”, “playing outside”, or “not being asleep all morning”, the other party reserves the right to join in arguing that another twenty minutes wouldn’t hurt, and they are free people.
     
    §5 If someone has seated themselves in either party’s couch and started to play on their computer, or scammed either party out of some refined metal, the other party has the option of joining them in dislodging the intruder and meting out justice.
     

    §6 If the parties decide they should be getting a life, and start doing homework instead of having fun, they can cancel this treaty with a 48-hour notice.

     

    Signed for the New Pacific Order,

     
    Letum,
    Emperor of the New Pacific Order
    Dungeon Master of Order

    Frawley,
    Imperial Regent of the New Pacific Order
     
    Necoho & Scourge,

    Imperial Officers of Foreign Affairs of the New Pacific Order

     
     
    Signed for the Dark Templar,

    BobTriumvir
    Supa_Troop3r/CartaTriumvir
    TiTaNTriumvir
    Terrence KrillinsHigh Templar of Finance (Bruce sucks, leafs suck)
    StarcraftmazterHigh Templar of Defense
    Hunterman1043Immortal
    protoaImmortal

     

     

     
    It was a pleasure to coordinate alongside Pacifica in this past conflict, and we look forward to continuing our partnership in the future.
     
    (also yes the flags are slightly off deal with it hart and Auctor) 
  5.  

    My understanding is The Emperor cancelled a scheduled meeting due to duplicitous actions by members of your coalition.

    Fark hits WFF, gets hit by Int, then Polaris freaks out over this escalation because its not a new war when Fark does it!

     

    Peace is on the table, Polaris has just decided they would prefer to remain at war.

  6. Fark (or really just Mr. Vicarious) claiming this is a separate conflict from the one Fark is engaged in is laughable at best. 

     

    Fark (or really just Mr. Vicarious) only messaged DT/GLoF tech sellers to go $%&@ themselves, not ODN or NoR.

     

    Fark (or really just Mr. Vicarious) ignored reason and decided to continue to be a !@#$ about the whole thing.

     

     

    Best of luck to WFF fighting off the assault from smontag and Mr. Vicarious's mouth.

  7. Our tech import to DBDC is making a big difference in this war, you are right.  They are really ripping into Polaris!

     

    Or..that already happened and you haven't had an active war with them in months.

  8.  

    Maybe you should have put up an announcement that DT Probes is part of your alliance, if it really is. But im probably asking too much from alliances that prefer to use one-liners as DoWs, if they post them at all. Or use ominous crimes one alliance supposedly commited some unspecified time in the past as a justification to attack another alliance.

    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/87815-dt-foreign-policy-statement/

     

    Sorry what?

  9.  

    Supplying nations with tech that are at war with us is the opposite of uninvolved.

    If you want to attack our members, expect some retaliation.  You attacked our defenseless members since you couldn't attack DBDC, so we attacked your defenseless ally like you attacked our defenseless members.  

  10.  

    Looks like FARK has been hitting DT Probes far harder than Polaris. Looking forward to your attacks against FARK allies like IRON, Anarchy Inc, and R&R. Not to mention New Polar Order :smug:

    Those seem like two different things for some reason, but golly I can't think of why!  

     

     


     

    Plenty of others could make "deft" political moves, but at the cost of loyality to their allies, and those "deft" political moves involve allying an alliance that has proven repeatedly its allies are not of any value to it besides pawns.

     

    I don't think any of our allies question our loyalty, but please enlighten me!

×
×
  • Create New...