-
Posts
602 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by darkfox
-
-
I've never even heard of this Argent thing. Are they new?
-
9 hours ago, Jason8 said:
Assigning a NS value for each wonder to keep more developed nations out of range of less developed nations (2,000 NS added for each wonder, maybe?)
Some wonders such as WRC could give more.
-
A shame. Good luck in the future.
-
I for one am thankful that the great and powerful jerdge has allowed us to have peace
-
12 hours ago, Grand Lord of Funk said:
I'm here to offer everyone a hug.
Fantastic, I accept
-
16 minutes ago, Rhizoctonia said:
Lots of words to just declare war
Is that what it says? Next time I need to ask for them to make it a picture book for me.
-
Have fun everyone.
-
Talk about a blast from the past. Welcome and see you on the battlefield
-
2 minutes ago, Tankobite said:
Wicked come-back from the man who had to look up 'inertia' and or 'tepid'
That was a yes or no question.
-
Just now, Tankobite said:
There's a button in-game that says "display all alliances." If you have the courage to play the game once cobra and NG are gone, I suggest you start there.
I asked, who you suggested. Perhaps you are the one with the ESL.
-
1 minute ago, Tankobite said:
No words in that sentence should require someone to look them up in a dictionary. Unless, perhaps they're ESL, which is naturally understandable. My hat is off to anyone who converses fluently in a language other than their mother tongue.
Do you need a hug?
-
1 minute ago, Tankobite said:
But I'm afraid you're just demonstrating that Johnny's point is correct. IRON and other large alliances are terrified of actually playing the game against peer AAs
What peer AAs would you suggest?
-
2 minutes ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:
I'll take the Dangerous Prizes over a life of tepid inertia any day.
I too own a dictionary.
-
28 minutes ago, TIEIXIAIS said:
I was wondering why NPO and IRON weren't posting in response, then I remembered they tell their members to not look or post on the forums. Imagine having no identity or doing as your told just so you can get some manwha. The leaders of the NPO nations are abunch of weebs.
Cool story bro.
-
9 hours ago, kerschbs said:
Haha it was tongue in cheek with Brewers, we’ve fought a bunch of times back to back.
Ahhh sorry about that
-
3 hours ago, kerschbs said:
Pretty hard to get rolled at your size but I think we’ve done a decent job.
IRON sucks, make better choices GATO.
Sorry, you guys are doing something? Hard to notice such small annoyances.
-
I hope you folks enjoy your retirement.
-
On 7/30/2017 at 0:53 AM, Mandystalin said:
I am. I'm highlighting the problem and I'm fighting back against my attackers. What more can I do? Plot?
Catch 22 I suppose.
-
57 minutes ago, Mandystalin said:
I prefer "They interrupted my holiday and my sled for no good reason... war"
But seriously. TTK is accused of plotting "a future Crusade against the Church of Oculus" and of "dispatching agents to other alliances to intercede on their behalf"
I actually started typing out a big reply logically explaining why this would be an illogical course of action for TTK, but then I wondered why I was a) insulting the OWF's collective intelligence and b) wasting my breath/pixels. We all know that the CB is irrelevant and made up. Tellingly, despite an impressive sticking to the party line of 'U iz plotterz' by the Oculus member nations, the story behind it wobbles about with every argument - here and elsewhere. Was it because Gh0s7 was a member? Was it because we (supposedly) knew what he was (supposedly) doing and didn't stop it? Was it because we (supposedly) knew what he was (supposedly) doing and (supposedly) supported/encouraged it? Was it because we (supposedly) instigated whatever it was he was (supposedly) doing? Was it because TTK itself is (supposedly) plotting some anti-Oc nastiness? There is no clear party line on the CB, there is no clarity offered when requested, evidence is claimed but not forthcoming... need I even point out that TTK was never approached by anybody to explain itself. The inescapable conclusion? They were looking for a fight. The only worthwhile question IMO is why. Maybe they were trying to restart the war that just finished. Maybe they were trying to punish TTK for its part in that war. maybe they are making a point about what happens when somebody stands up to the Oc-bloc. Maybe they were worried that we had attained some sort of figurehead prominence after the last war and wanted to stamp on that. Only Oculus' leaders know, and they aren't telling.
Alliances have been rolled for less. If people think our CB isn't strong enough then feel free to do something about it.
-
Members of the Legion I would like to humbly request that your top nations gain more NS until I can declare on them, or your top nation leave peacemode. Thank you in advance.
-
6 hours ago, Subtleknifewielder said:
You kinda needed it lol. No offense, but you guys don't seem well coordinated. The people I'm fighting are alright, but they are fighting as individuals, not teams.
Saying "no offense" before saying something blatantly offensive is silly. Glof could have handled you guys on their own. It is a darn shame that we are too fond of them to let that happen.
-
time to glow
o/
-
Darn I guess Animals will just have to declare war on IRON. How will we ever survive?
-
Congratulations homeboy
Name The War Poll
in World Affairs (IC)
Posted
That is impressive for a new alliance