Jump to content

Atanatar

Banned
  • Posts

    383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Atanatar

  1. Good luck STA, and may your future milestones be pleasant and peaceful.
  2. [quote name='idsfa' timestamp='1328380537' post='2914504'] I wasn't even s'posed to [b]be here[/b] today! Congrats to everyone who got the job they wanted. [/quote] And to those that got the job they didn't want?
  3. [quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1328335181' post='2914324'] congrats Tums and the FAN spy [/quote] Thanks. It feels good man.
  4. Finally, I am one step closer to seizing power all for my self.
  5. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1324700951' post='2885384'] Yes. I guess we have different ideas of what constitutes worst. [/quote] That's reasonable. [quote]Insults are fine for me, whereas childish, intellectually-stunted, dead meme-laden alliances based around beer and bacon are not.[/quote] For having a problem with childish and intellectually stunted alliances, you sure have no problem with childish, intellectually-stunted discourse. But, having admitted you live under a bridge, it's not surprising. Have a good evening.
  6. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1324699100' post='2885347'] I assumed so from your second post, I just didn't feel like playing along. [b]You and your ilk are the worst[/b], so any contribution I can make to a reinstatement of radio silence is something I am happy to do. And thankyou, TBF though I'd take any opportunity I get to [b]call you a retard[/b] so. [/quote] Holy Christ. Me and my fellow Fark members are the worst, and you're going around calling people retards in a friendly thread? Seriously? Don't complain about the splinter in my eye, when you have a forest in yours.
  7. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1324697837' post='2885324'] :haw: dat burn was almost as awsum as beer bacon and boobs amirite [/quote] Alright, since my sarcastic faux-correction didn't clue you into the fact that there may be an in-joke involved, allow me to direct you [url=http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rotsky]to the appropriate entry.[/url] That said, your attempts to goad me into a rage filled response is lacking in execution and form. How ever, I simply must congratulate you at calling me a retard for having a joke with my fellow Farker. Truly, you are the paradigm of wit and hilarity.
  8. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1324692773' post='2885270'] Then you[b]r[/b] a retard. Unless you actually think he is trying to call people chestnut[b]'s[/b] instead of saying they have some. [/quote] Really now. Just because you're a Sith gives you no right to spell in such an atrocious manner.
  9. [quote name='Emperor Norton I' timestamp='1324686789' post='2885192'] My entire nation is an open fire, and there are chestnuts roasting on it. You[b]'re[/b] chestnuts. [/quote] Sorry, pet peeve. Merry Christmas Bob. Let it rain blood and ashes for a thousand years.
  10. It would be a terrible insult to my nation's heritage to surrender to my very first rogue.
  11. It hasn't been swept under the rug, and it IS being handled internally in accordance to the charter. So really, all you're really doing is providing a healthy round of face palming for CN at large. Well done.
  12. [quote name='Swanfield' timestamp='1282548157' post='2427464'] I am not an attention seeking whore, I am calling it how I see it. Private discussions is ineffective as it could be brushed easily under the carpet like many times before. [/quote] Of course you aren't doing it for the attention. I mean, how could I have possibly come to that conclusion, what with the inflammatory language and the fact its in an open area of the forums, to be viewed by people who are probably sick of seeing third rate drama such as this.
  13. Rather convenient to place blame on one singular person. Sadly, that is not possible. The events over the past week has more than one person at cause. It can be traced to a failure of communication, a lack of interest from the \m/ general membership, a pessimistic attitude by those who do nothing to actually solve the issue, and people like me who left over the weeks due to either lack of interest or other factors. How ever, unlike you, I saw my Alliance in trouble and decided to come back and help fix it. Unlike you, I am not whoring my self out to the peanut gallery for love and acclamation. Unlike you, Im not going to stand by and complain. I'm actually going to do something.
  14. [quote name='Swanfield' timestamp='1282547619' post='2427437'] Me bitter? No this is my departing statement to the good citizens of \m/. Call it advice if you like and no I wasn't part of the impeachment attempt process. [/quote] No, this is about your love of the attention. If you truly wanted a departing statement that you wanted to be acted upon, It would have been done privately.
  15. [quote name='Swanfield' timestamp='1282546669' post='2427414'] You may ask me this, why does the citizens of \m/ not leave the alliance? Well to be honest with you I honestly have no idea but it is their home after all and no matter how bad it gets, it will always be their home and it is where their friends are.[/quote] Yes, why wont a self respecting person follow your hallowed footsteps by dropping AA and moan about an alliance, instead of staying behind and try to fix it internally? I suppose this would be difficult for you, because that would require you to keep quiet and out of the public spot light. [quote]The events of the last week or so caused a few people to trigger an impeachment process against Emperor Marx that was legal and within the charter and more half of the people voicing their opinions on that particular topic agreed that he had to go. Yet Emperor Marx used the reason that the people behind the impeachment process has been illegally attempting to bypass the leadership in an attempt to downgrade the treaties between \m/ and his allies to suspend the impeachment process indefinitely.[/quote] The Impeachment process is continuing, and is currently up to vote by the general membership as according to our charter. [quote]The truth is that no such thing happened, it was merely a friendly chat between citizens of two alliances that are allied on how best their relationship can proceed and there was no demands made. It was merely a word of advice between friends.[/quote] A conversation that happened without the knowledge of the triumvirate or the MoFA. Friendly or not, it was incredibly foolish to do so. [quote]What angers me most is the fact that Caliph and Emperor Marx twisted the scenario to their advantage in an attempt to paint the people behind the impeachment process (who actually wanted the best for their alliance) as traitors and then they went on to paint the whole thing as an coup attempt when in fact it was an outright lie.[/quote] Of course not, It was just a certain selection of members that flaunted the chain of command, damaged relations with our allies, and then attempted to (Apparently) use a loophole to ensure no action could be taken against them. Rather convenient. [quote]I hope that my friends in my former alliance rethink their position carefully for nothing but an unanimous outcry from every single citizen in \m/ will do. [/quote] You had your chance to voice your opinions and work to better an alliance you called home. Instead you chose to drop AA, and moan. Funny, I believe Tyga's Law applies here, no?
  16. I'm very happy to see Caveman72 get a nod. He was a Purple Senator for awhile in Vox, and a hell of a fighter. He was one of the best Fark had to offer.
  17. [quote name='Antoine Roquentin' date='30 May 2010 - 02:20 AM' timestamp='1275204041' post='2316436'] Of course, but you can get that kind of aid regardless of who your protector is. I'm talking about large sums of free aid. [/quote] Very true. Granted, I would never recommend large aid falls to begin with, it often pushes tech sellers out of range too quick. So it's really a trade off: Aid falls ensures a safety net for new nations to play with, but stunts internal growth; Where as organized tech deals allows for enticement from allies to buy tech, and improves growth in the lower tier and the upper tier. Of course, the perhaps dooming downside is that it is slower growth for sure, and may prove boring for a lot of the new nations.
  18. [quote name='Antoine Roquentin' date='30 May 2010 - 12:05 AM' timestamp='1275195916' post='2316284'] Who has the slots to help hundreds of nations grow to their full potential? I've never heard of a protector giving boosts that made a difference for their protected alliance(especially in this case where it's hundreds of nations) in the long run. Sure aid falls may occur, but not enough for explosive growth on their own. [/quote] Actually, I believe Trident had a revolving protectorate with the Guru Order, and involved quite a large series of tech deals. Not sure if it's comparable in size to this, but shows how it could be done right. So I'm sure GOONS has a very sweet bargaining chip: letting their friends and prospects in on the sweet tech deal fun.
  19. My hats off to you as always, Opethian. Hali!
  20. [quote name='ktarthan' date='12 May 2010 - 02:37 PM' timestamp='1273693025' post='2296164'] There was three nations at ZI without any soldiers that he was able to hit. [/quote] Oh god, what have we done?! With the Military Might that TBB commands being effectivly derailed, these heinous ZIed nations are now free to wreak untold [I]havoc[/I] and [I]destruction[/I] on the nations of IRON! If you can't tell, I'm entirely unamused by the bawwing from some of you. If TBB is the best hope IRON had, you are well and truly screwed without some divine intervention.
  21. They have learned well from the Legion of old: The stats are meaningless! They are clearly winning this war!
  22. Nonymyguy, if you could contact me on a transcendental plane ((ooc: IRC, Coldfront, #blinging13 )) I believe we could hold a formal inquiery in private.
  23. About time! I'm glad we are finally, formally tied.
  24. A matter of public record is never pointless.
×
×
  • Create New...