Jump to content

Comrade Korey

Members
  • Posts

    540
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Comrade Korey

  1. [quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1323307908' post='2867996'] It's almost like they didn't care. [/quote] /thread. Though Kalasins post was one of the only in this thread worth reading as well. It definitely would have been interesting to see more from FAN, but after you've been on your own for so long why would you want to rejoin the real world?
  2. If you happen to have any tech I wouldn't be opposed Anyway I quit once and had some trouble with this character. Coming back under this alias was difficult for me too but I had a few good friends in this game to help me get by and join an alliance ect. Anyway good luck in real life. I've found that when I quit I didn't miss the game, but I had an urge to come back because of curiosity. If you happen to return to the game you could shoot me a PM and I'll repay you for your generosity.
  3. I find this unexpected, and awesome. Good luck to all parties involved and may this expedite the process of me getting in range for nukes. Is that still how it works?
  4. In other news, profanity on Polar's boards skyrockets 1200%
  5. [quote name='King Louis the II' timestamp='1322706667' post='2857480'] best post of the year. Hands down. And no, I am not being sarcastic. [/quote] I disagree. "TOP and IRON have already clearly stated that their quarrel lay with Polaris' actions from many years ago. And as such, this should remain a conflict between them." Why, because it's a really old vendetta, does that mean everyone else should stay out of it? That doesn't even make sense. The TOP/IRON side clearly wants other alliances to jump in so his whole point is negated. It might make sense if TOP/IRON at all gave the sense that they wanted it to be mano-a-mano against Polar then maybe it would have legitimacy.
  6. [quote name='Delta1212' timestamp='1322702808' post='2857419'] No, callouts only work when you successfully prey on someone's insecurities... ect ect [/quote] After reading this wall of text, this thread may as well be closed. I think Delta has made his case and basically made everyone look like children. As a member of the peanut gallery, I wouldn't mind it if RIA got in this because that would entertain me. The fact is, the reasons they are not are probably legitimate reasons. But seriously, RIA, go fight because I am not entertained
  7. I think the fact that Grub doesn't defend his actions from bi-polar besides saying "It was interesting and I mixed things up" goes to show you that it isn't really defensible. It's a fair CB, most alliances have an alliance they would roll if given the opportunity even if its been years since they interacted. There's been a lot of dumb CB's lately and this isn't one of them. That being said, I used to be in Polar and I still like the alliance so I hope in the end they survive (which I'm sure they will) and all is forgiven and they can move on.
  8. "Should either signatory initiate conflict or engage in warfare by reason of outside obligation, the corresponding signatory is strongly encouraged, but not obligated, to provide whatever assistance it deeps appropriate." Should say deems appropriate I'm assuming. Might wanna fix that, otherwise congrats, good job, have fun
  9. Country titles please, a graph should be completely self-explanatory. Good job otherwise but maybe have total bloc statistics as well. If you have a spreadsheet anyway you can make it practically do the math itself. PS If that came off as rude I apologize. Just constructive advice and its a good spreadsheet, I hate working with those things myself.
  10. Hahahahahahahaah that picture made my week. Good luck to everyone involved yadda yadda whatevz
  11. [quote name='Vladimir Stukov II' timestamp='1315257024' post='2795477'] Thanks, long time no see. [/quote] Been busy underwater basket weaving. If it was a couple weeks ago when I was unaligned Id've been glad to join your cause
  12. The old WUT/Toilet bowl gaing era (NPO, \m/, GOONS, TPF, ect) vs former league alliance,( ODN, legion, GATO, ect) I think it would be hard to pick out a single alliance against a single alliance from that time period. The only way would probably be to find out which alliance NPO hated the most because the whole league side hated NPO pretty evenly. It's actually very impressive that so many alliances hated NPO for so long and yet it took until Karma to beatdown NPO.
  13. [quote name='Letum' timestamp='1305522884' post='2712685'] To prove that they had the requisite strength on that day. That way there can be no shenanigans like us Bulking them up or Doomhouse counting their NS [i]after[/i] they get attacked. [/quote] Okay, thank you I would have never thought of that. Good luck rebuilding when this is all over NPO, I have a feeling it will be an impressive rebuild
  14. I don't understand why you have shown pictures of the nations in peace mode. To prove that they left PM?
  15. Good luck Gramlins and especially Enrique Barrentos!
  16. And I really thought we'd have to wait until Muddogs balls dropped for him to make an announcement about this very pruny problem he's having with his member /bad pun
  17. Good luck with your new leadership. Also the NoR part of this article thus far certainly does not apply to myself
  18. NoR how could you?!?!!?! You broke the treaty that never said you couldn't attack NPO!Skunks, the lot of you
  19. [quote name='Fyfe XIV' timestamp='1296540458' post='2614267'] Next time we make come up with reps for an alliance, we'll take into account what members of the New Polar Order, New Pacific Order and New Sith Order think. Or should I say The Orders [/quote] Well you're gonna have to go find someone that's in any of those alliances and find out what they think.
  20. [quote name='Fyfe XIV' timestamp='1296537723' post='2614097'] The only time I request you add a term and you leave it out? For shame. Also, people complaining about terms... you just encourage us [/quote] It's stupid. It isn't in character and it's stupid, stupid, stupid. If I'm ever in an alliance that makes such dumb terms and thinks its original or funny I'm leaving ASAP solely on principle that they have an awful sense of humor. It doesn't affect me what terms you give MCXA, I could care less about what happens to MCXA and I doubt your alliance is going to be putting me through any of those terms any time soon. I just think its in bad taste.
  21. All of this "MCXA shall write a blah blah blah" is crap. They declared in defense of their allies, stop trying to mock them, people have real life to attend to. You are wasting people's time with pointless garbage.
  22. Well they can just not stop beating up GOONS until you go after them then activate more treaties.
  23. According to the CN wiki the NPO side has more strength and a higher score (at least last it was updated). I'm assuming the point of everyone declaring on GOONS is because GOONS has less treaties to activate than the others? Either way if Doomhouse loses that would be pretty epic considering they worked so hard to stage this so that they may win.
×
×
  • Create New...