Lukapaka

[quote name='USMC123' timestamp='1320446154' post='2838859'] I will assume you don't know that VE and NSO HATE each other [/quote] But with half the AA in peace mode, and the rest with really low NS or with filled slots VE won't really get the satisfaction of properly rolling them, will they?

[quote name='Flonker' timestamp='1320445789' post='2838853'] What did NSO promise to our new moral police to get this kind of intervention on their behalf? [/quote] I think it had something to do with double sided light-sabers.....

[quote name='GoddessOfLinn' timestamp='1320444659' post='2838828'] I have read all 14 pages and fail to find an answer to this question: If we in Legion offer white peace a cross the board and NSO reject, who will then be attacked? [/quote] They'll follow their newest slogan: Everynoob. MUST. DIE!

[quote name='alyster' timestamp='1320440458' post='2838753'] Next time you roll out... are you planning to call in Fark and MHA then as well against TFD and almighty NATO like last time? [/quote] I mean we are in a bloc together. Why wouldn't we fight together? [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif[/img]

[quote name='Cager' timestamp='1320439000' post='2838715'] Sparta couldn't roll themselves down a hill to be honest with you [/quote] Well I appreciate the honesty! I'll be sure to jot it down in my notebook of useless babble, and make reference of it next time we roll out.

[quote name='Cager' timestamp='1320434545' post='2838633'] If you don't like it then [size="6"]DO SOMETHING[/size] about it. Guess that will quiet most because nobody will actually do anything about it. [/quote] You should check public chans more: <%Luka[Sparta]> w/e, Sparta's going to roll MK, VE, NSO, Tetris, and Legion. Announcement coming tomorrow. [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/ehm.gif[/img]

[quote name='Isaac MatthewII' timestamp='1320433894' post='2838614'] and allies yes lol alone i dont think so [/quote] [size=2][quote name='USMC123' timestamp='1320433579' post='2838607'] I... wha... huh? O.o [/quote] [/size][size=2] [/size][size=2]Oh god, people took me serious.....[/size][size=2] [/size][size=2]btw. the first line is in reference to a show my nation's people receive from an alien planet broadcast, called Dexter.[/size]

Tick tick tick... that's the sound of their lives running out. I think Legion, Tetris and NSO could join in arms and take on VE and MK though [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif[/img]

This thread has left me speechless! Who are you, and what happened to Boring Bob??

[quote name='leongsh' timestamp='1319889334' post='2834380'] Yes, isn't that what I said, i.e."While I'm not part of TLR government, it is the general policy that TLR will try to avoid hitting allies of its direct MDoAP allies, what more, that of a CnG alliance." You have problems reading and understanding what I'm reiterating?[/quote] It's exactly what you said. I was rewriting it for emphasis. [quote name='leongsh' timestamp='1319889334' post='2834380'] The person that is acting dumb and ignorant is you. Our general policy is that TLR won't attack an ally of an MDoAP/MADP ally. Hence, as there is still a treaty between RIA and INT while INT still has an MDAP bloc treaty with us, we won't be targeting RIA. INT knows that. We're not going to throw away our MDAP relationship with INT within CnG for the sake of wanting to roll RIA. RIA is not worth it. [/quote] (LOL, ignorant and dumb... right.) So then you're really not upset that RIA didn't defend SOS, because tLR wouldn't have been able to attack RIA anyway? Your retort doesn't make your earlier statement make ANY more sense to me though: [color=#1C2837][/color][quote][color=#1C2837]If you wish to test whether TLR are cowards, [/color][color=#1C2837]RIA could drop their treaty with INT enitrely so that there's no hiding behind INT's CnG MADP membership.[/color][/quote][color=#1C2837][/color] You've still yet to make any sense of this 'come-at-me-bro' statement. I don't get you, and I'm done caring about your logic, since you're really just some dude spouting off. Good luck and stuff. [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/lol1.gif[/img]

[quote name='leongsh' timestamp='1319875764' post='2834355'] While I'm not part of TLR government, it is the general policy that TLR will try to avoid hitting allies of its direct MDoAP allies, what more, that of a CnG alliance. If you wish to test whether TLR are cowards, RIA could drop their treaty with INT enitrely so that there's no hiding behind INT's CnG MADP membership. [/quote] What is this? I don't even.... [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif[/img] I'm gonna try and break this down: [quote]While I'm not part of TLR government, it is the general policy that TLR will try to avoid hitting allies of its direct MDoAP allies[/quote] 'TLR will not attack any ally of International: namely RIA, R&R' ---> [b]A major reason why tLR won't hit RIA is because of International's treaty with them.[/b] [quote] If you wish to test whether TLR are cowards,[/quote] RIA's not the one posturing, and strutting around like it's some sort of alpha rooster. While I can't speak for them, I really don't get the impression they're out to prove anything to tLR. [quote]RIA could drop their treaty with INT enitrely so that there's no hiding behind INT's CnG MADP membership.[/quote] HUH?!?!? [b][u]So to prove tLR is cowardly, RIA should remove the connection you share through Int., just so tLR can justify an attack [i]against them[/i]?[/u][/b] ...... [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/lol1.gif[/img] Dude,[b] if tLR wants to attack RIA, they should be able to justify it to their ally International.[/b] If they can, International will be accepting of the attack on not intervene. If their reason is stupid and unjustified... then they're not going to appreciate action taken by tLR.

[quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1319784185' post='2833473'] "They are cowards, they waited until we'd have a better excuse to cower out of defending our treaty partner!" [/quote] If someone is actually committed to fighting someone they have issues with, there's no point in sending their friend to pick on their opponent's friend. All that does is create more tension, and Admin knows, we don't need any more tension. No, if someone is [i]actually committed [/i]to fighting, they should man up and throw a punch. I don't see the point for these theories on 'what side is losing more, with all these micro-wars', since it doesn't look like any makro-alliance is going to do anything more than just flap flap flap flap FLAP their jaws.

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1319783026' post='2833461'] I'm proud of ensuring that next time around, GPA wont just take it on the chin. NG attacked a "treaty partner" they were aware we downgraded with, they were not willing to attack while we had an MDP, you don't find that interesting that they waited until it was an optional treaty before attacking? if you were willing to taste the pot, you'd stop with these ridiculous wars you know wont accomplish your task, and actually just hit GOD like your side wants, $%&@ treaties, $%&@ consequences, just do what you want and stop pretending like these wars are entirely random, if you wanted to hit GOD or Superfriends, you'd grow the balls to do it. [/quote] It's almost like they don't even have a reason to hit SF... [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif[/img]

Too kind Gar!

[quote name='Bob Ilyani' timestamp='1319767537' post='2833313'] Do you ever, [i]ever[/i], think about what you type out before you post it? [/quote] Can we rename this topic to this^

[quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1319606794' post='2832434'] you guys are only leaving where Hyp left off [/quote] Right! I'm just here to carry out his mission..

[quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1319589427' post='2832343'] You were saying? [/quote] Hahaha, those logs are hilarious! The epitome of Diplomat Hyp. In breaking news, nso learns we don't respect them [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif[/img] Give them as much [i]credence [/i]as you'd like. Particularly the part where he predicts a future War

And so dies DoA[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif[/img] Good luck, Mortal Wombat

Well written Rush. I'm glad to see class still exists within TLR.

Solid cogs. Nice treaty, guys!

Nice nukes! Keep it up dudes.

93 Legion Nations in war mode and still not in anarchy?! What's going on here?

[quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1317723532' post='2815962'] No, because now it looks like !@#$. I mean, TBH I don't really care, crappy propaganda gets trotted out every war, but it would be nice if people would at least try and make them effective. And giving yourself more room just means your message is going to get more convoluted and therefore less effective. Working within a restriction, like the OWF sig rules, forces you to strip everything down because you don't have the room for anything else. You said yourself it can't be too wordy, well the same principle applies to the rest of it. My sig, while not a spectacular offering, at least sums up a NSO view of the war with a simple picture and 5 words. [/quote] LESS TALK, MORE ARTWORK NUB! WTF ARE YOU EVEN ARGUING ABOUT?

[quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1317710546' post='2815874'] Just waiting for sparta trash to join in I guess. [/quote] Just the reaction I was looking for! I think I scored the first point in successful propaganda! NSO Morale[b] -1[/b]

My take on things: [img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b214/lukapaka/JunkyardWars.png[/img]