SpacingOutMan

No commentary on how DT passed Fark? You have shown your truly colors Gopher. Your bias against us is duly noted. ;) Also... Woo! MHA, we come for you. :ehm:

I was Subject 0 in their supa sektri spai program.

Still <3 you. :wub: Does that mean I can come out of the [spy] closet now? :P

I just realized... I have the power to maintain our sanction or take it away. I expect to be the Supreme Ayatollah Derpmaster Supreme by the end of the day.

Fark... we come for you. :ehm:

Gino wanted to relive the time when CSN was sanctioned and peaked at something like 600 members. During his short-lived tenure in CSN in his most recent iteration, he advocated for mass recruitment, whereas the rest of government (myself and Liz included) wanted smaller numbers for management purposes. And ultimately we all see how that panned out. I can't recall him approaching me about merging to be honest. That isn't to say it didn't happen because it definitely sounds like something Gino would strive for; I only recall him wanted to treaty us, though I never got back to him on it. But yeah, definitely something I would shoot down immediately. The fact that the remnant of CSN merged into Invicta after disbanding (save for a few, such as myself, who went elsewhere) basically reflected our overall opinion of HB and DRN. I kind of figured he wanted to take a stab at hitting CSN, along with the rest of HB as well. Perhaps he shouldn't have tried to coup Liz by trying to recruit the people who supported Liz the most.

And how would we classify intra-alliance tech sellers? Neither employer-employee nor retailer-customer relationships accurately describe this modality. More specifically, preferential tech deals that promote nation size growth without stymieing adequate tech growth in the upper tiers. If we are going to be minimally honest, we have to rectify the fundamental differences between open market and alliance/bloc*-exclusive tech markets. *Bloc as in an agreement made between multiple alliances to generate tech deals, such as economic treaties or even informal agreements giving "A" preferential treatment in tech deals (i.e., the relationship between DBDC and Doomsquad).

Oh boy. This shall be interesting.

DT-DBDC merger imminent. ;) Heard it first from Rota!

Eat your words non-believer! ;)

Neck and neck race between UMB and DT right now. :o

Dark Templar rose by 0.08, but we didn't tie for third for the Biggest Gainer for the day? :(

He is quite devilish; handsome, yet evil with a side of lots o' daddy issues.

So... DBDC is not just any bird, but a peacock. Doom Peacock.

It was a long road, but Auir showed me the light. Because Ziyaal fought back? I thought it was pretty clear what Artigo said. :mellow:

Ah alright, cool, it isn't my fault. It's Bob's fault, that penguin-waddling bark-chewer (<3 Bob). As our MoD, I guess he is just getting intel on the true enemy: Cuba. My body is ready. :war:

Are you referring to my remarks from a week ago when you first brought this up? I was implying that we were buddies, not quasi-merged. :v: Anyways, our treaty is here: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/118890-the-dark-templar-hits-dbdc-in-defense-of-morality/ Deduce what you will super-sleuth. I haven't a clue. I'm an ACC fan.

I'm down.

Sometimes you need to break your resistance into capitulating before the Stockholm Syndrome kicks in. ;)

Shhhh. You're unraveling the conspiracy too quickly.

I don't think your squawking did much of anything. If anything, it enticed Cuba. RIP Finnish Commie. RIP Dreadnought. RIP Baron DeSandersted.

I wonder if there is a DT-DBDC treaty floating around or something. Oh right, there is. Shocker. Also, are we back to the moralism of "tech raiding is bad yo"?

For what it's worth, I can second this. Dealing with STA in coalition channels (only happened once, but it certainly stood out) was painful.

7/10. Would read again.

I'd say the outlook for Pacifica is looking infinitely better in the grand scheme of things right now, especially in the long-term.