De Caelo Missus

I can change resources on 1st of Sept so sign me up too http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=504688

5 slots open. Ping me an offer or message in game. Tech first or tech last, I'm easy. I will however need one kind soul to send me money first so I can buy some... http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=504688

Ok is someone going to explain this for those, like me, who aren't involved in back channel gossip? All I've got out of this thread is that numerous PC gov have been deleted and that RoK seemingly have something to do with it, but nobody is willing to talk about it... a rogue in RoK perhaps?

Also sent

[quote name='Dylan Carter' timestamp='1297072067' post='2623865'] Congrats to everyone on peace. Sparta Val surrendered, GGA was declared on to hit one high NS nation our allies couldn't hit, and Kronos left the NpO war when the ally we entered to help wanted to give them peace. If Kronos had talked as much */-% as Exodus has during this war, and then surrendered this quickly you might have a point in there somewhere other DC [also, agreeing with Pippy ]. [/quote] Oh come on, every single person talks !@#$ about the opposition. Exodus just do it in public rather than in private channels

[quote name='Epiphanus' timestamp='1297061127' post='2623710'] Man Exodus stuck it out for a long time! </sarcasm> [/quote] I thought 2 weeks was pretty standard? The Kronos/Val war lasted 2 weeks. The Kronos/GGA war a few days over 2 weeks and the Kronos/NpO war was only 2 weeks iirc. Were you using the same sarcasm about the alliance you helped found too?

Unfortunately you are correct. "You have received an error trying to view a page. Here is the detailed error code: You must wait until after 24 hours after declaring war before launching nuclear weapons."

War Declaration Date - 2/1/2011 4:24:24 PM So I should be able to nuke on 02/02/2011 at 5PM However it is now 2/2/2011 1:33:25 PM and I am able to nuke YAY [IMG]http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj125/decaelo/Capture2.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj125/decaelo/Capture1.jpg[/IMG] I had nuked them a few days ago but the war expired. Now I've re-declared so it may have something to do with it?

That's a shame. There's only one reason the guys on the AA are still there. I suppose I can't complain really as it gives me an extra week to get in range

[quote name='Captain Nathan Brittles' timestamp='1286935008' post='2483094'] The problem is you're labelling a type of result that can occur at any odds attack as if it's only exists as an underdog bonus. I've had this result happen to me at 70%+ odds attacks. It's a result you only get if you lose (think of it as just missing the die roll needed to win the battle). So it's no surprise this is seen more when making low odds attacks since this is where you'll lose the most attacks. So somewhere along the line someone notices this result and the frequency in which it occurred to them at low odds and put 2+2 together and gets 5 and thinks they discovered some admin secret to help the underdog with a bonus. Admin has stated there is no underdog bonus. [/quote] I've been in a fair few wars to date. I used to always use my spare troops on aggressive runs when I had between 5-15% odds and 75% of the time I would have one of these half attack losses. In my current wars I must have tried it around 20 times and not once have I had it. Something has definitely changed.

Has the underdog bonus been removed?

I wouldn't as I am homophobic....or is it claustrophobic? wait... which is the one about being in a closet?

[quote name='Owned-You' timestamp='1283120759' post='2435051'] Oh hey. Aircastle vanished into thin air. [/quote] They still had an impressive setup and fought in a war.

Been as though it's a military poll of 2010, I would have expected Aircastle to have maybe gotten a mention. The way the coordinated their nation growth was impressive, however I'm not too sure on their performance. Also how did you miss Asgaard off? During the TOP/C&G war they were #3 in offensive wars declared, #12 defensive wars and #7 total wars per nation. Even if they had completely sucked, they should have atleast got a mention for their willingness.

[quote name='Vol Navy' timestamp='1281245084' post='2404329'] Ironic that one of the protected nations is actually being raided by a member of Poison Clan. [/quote] Oh my What makes it even funnier is it was CitizenKane who came to Kronos to request reps.

[quote name='Schad' timestamp='1281199537' post='2403784'] Yeah, that one is particularly egregious...however, when you take into consideration the fact that so many people have seen 10+ nations -- all in war mode, between 20k-60k NS and on black, where there were previously no nations fitting that description -- suddenly appear on None where there was , and didn't question it before rushing in for a rare raid opportunity, I guess that it shouldn't be a shock that piddling little details like your alliance's treaties don't enter into it. [/quote] Well around my NS, 45k, there's been a fair few on none of late. The past month alone I have raided 5 of them, 8 with these current 3. Honestly, as ex-PC, I thought these 3 were reverse raiding which is why I attacked them.

[quote name='SpectreTehDestroyer' timestamp='1281127775' post='2403058'] Well, either you are a hypocrite or you want to intentionally anger PC. [/quote] You should really delve into your feminine side more... You'd be more inclined to pick up the irony then.

[quote name='SpectreTehDestroyer' timestamp='1281124992' post='2402987'] These none nations that you are protecting should also have in their bio that they are being protected, so that people who do not check the CNF will know NOT to raid them. Like me.... [/quote] Only an idiot like you could miss this anyway.

[quote name='elborrador' timestamp='1280246592' post='2391249'] I would say there is more damage to be had before my nation ceases to exist [/quote] Not with your warchest there's not

The Kronos one is super. It's not really something that can be posted here though, but can be found on the home page of the Kronos forums in my sig.

We've been trying to provoke our allies into war, so we get to fight them again. Nothing too bad.

I'd have to go Aztec too.

Kind of the wrong way to go about it, but props to Kevanovia for atleast trying to revive UPN.

[quote name='Drai' date='17 July 2010 - 04:55 AM' timestamp='1279338927' post='2375449'] When did the rotational triumvirate go [/quote] Bout the same time Heracles and co did. It just wasn't as effective without them, so we streamlined it to suit our current situation.

What a dick move to pull on Valhalla. De Caelo is unimpressed!