-
Posts
5,557 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Franz Ferdinand
-
-
Congratulations in the Sanctioned status.
-
Well, everything that needs to be done has been done. The other way would be if you deleted your nation and started again if you don't want to spend any money.
-
Well, you better use the Donation system and pay $20 for that.
-
What does your alliance offer that most of the others out there currently do? Do you have any tech deal offerings, or tangible perks / breadth of community?
-
I guess it's...
-
Did SlimCad write this?
-
UCR and MU in the same place... madness.
-
Apologies for asking this, but how come they haven't reported this themselves here?
-
Didn't even realise this was still active, thought it had gone inactive.
-
11 hours ago, DavidMustaine said:
I guess that all depends on the purpose of creating a new account. From the information index:
DO NOT attempt to abuse the foreign aid system with multiple accounts by the same player. Any puppet nation used in the foreign aid system is against the rules. This includes player created nations to send aid to themselves, alliance created puppets to use as a 'bank' for their alliance, etc... Players are asked to help keep the foreign aid system honest and report any violations discovered of these rules in the Report Game Abuse forum immediately. Nations that do cheat will be flagged with a cheat indicator in the All Foreign Aid Offers Across the Globe screen for everyone to see.
If I'm not mistaken there was an instance where a group of noobs tried to use puppets a long time ago, it blew up in their faces.
Although in the case, I was referring more to the following:
4. By using this service you agree not to cheat in the form of abusing the war system, foreign aid system, trade system with multiple accounts controlled by the same user. You agree not to create more than one player account in this game and understand that by creating or accessing more than one account you will be in violation of these terms and conditions. As of 7/2/2014 multiple accounts on the same computer network are allowed, as long as the accounts are controlled by different players. No interaction (war, trade, foreign aid, etc..) between players on the same network is allowed either directly or through 3rd parties (ie. no sending foreign aid to someone who is not on your network who then sends foreign aid back to someone who is on your network). Moderation will still investigate multi account abuse and will continue to reserve the right to remove rule violators from the game. Account sitting is only allowed for a limit of 70 days (10 weeks) when reported in the nation sitting thread in the Moderation section of the Cyber Nations forums.
-
12 hours ago, ToiletGaming3000 said:
Excuse me what?
It's a violation of the Terms and Conditions when you register to play CyberNations.
-
On 10/13/2023 at 7:31 PM, ToiletGaming3000 said:
Rule 2: You are to not manage 2 nations at a time unless you got permission to do so.
Might want to rethink that rule.
-
Didn't most of the alliance leave to form Madlads Union?
-
A most interesting development.
-
1 hour ago, AL Bundy said:
Doom Wolves Have CLAWS
Article 5 – Option C) Al Bundy, though he loves CLAWS big time, gets utterly fed up with CLAWS “cyber nations politics” style, disbands Doom Wolves and joins Non Grata to see if Non Grata has any balls. (Although I am not disbanding)
Well, I guess this'll do:
-
35 minutes ago, jerdge said:
As the ruler of a nation that never has soldiers in the first place I'll certainly won't be the one making fun of #2.
(In fact I'm absolutely qualified to explain why it may actually make a lot of sense, depending on the objectives one set for themselves.)
Incorrect, you have 1,930,074 casualties, so historically you had soldiers at one point, most likely when starting out / building the nation when it was the 20/25% of all citizens should be soldiers phase.
-
Well at least that chapter can be closed.
-
1 hour ago, Kapleo said:
Our latest government meeting showed overwhelming appreciation towards The Wolves. If what you say is true and TW doesn't feel the same about us, perhaps it's something Bundy's government should bring up privately so we can either work it out or be done with it, but since this is coming from you I'll just water it down to FL just being his usual ass.
It's well known that Firingline doesn't like CLAWS, and will likely be trying anything to derail that relationship. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if he decides to rejoin NATO when this is all said and done.
-
Just now, Quantum Leap said:
Polaris just really enjoys making wonderful friends
QLI shall await my invitation with bated breath.
-
3 minutes ago, lilweirdward said:
Oh. OH. Ohhhhhh. Interesting.
I honestly cannot think of a more attractive couple than Polaris and MONGOLS. To their future!
Well why don't we consider signing a little treaty of our own?
-
1 minute ago, lilweirdward said:
Really awesome treaty between some awesome folks! I’m excited for the future!
Jeez man, do I even need to say it?Wanna get a room together and discuss it? 😉
-
Just now, lilweirdward said:
Why are you so mad, though? Is the thought of so many handsome individuals in one treaty just that upsetting?
Surely if that was the case, it wouldn't be the MONGOLS getting the treaty, it'd be you. 😉
-
Just now, firingline said:
I'm not sure what that has to do with my point.
As I said - UCR declared war on TW, was defeated on the battlefield despite outnumbering TW, and refuses to accept a fair peace offer - instead demanding TW surrender (despite, again, TW clearly having won this war.)
We all know what's going on here, and while I know playing dumb is kind of your thing, nobody's buying it.
Well, Non Grata declared war on UCR, and their treaty holders in OG decided to have 3 out of 7 nations go into peace mode around the same time? That sounds a bit sketchy to me. Just focusing on the more relevant parts, The Wolves have their own thread for that drama.
-
Just now, firingline said:
No "defense" of UCR is necessary.
They're the ones who declared war on TW and they're the ones refusing a fair peace offer despite losing to TW.
Although Old Guard apparently has an active treaty with UCR:
Announcing the one true -ATO
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Thought the one true -ATO was the Cross Atlantic Treaty Organization?