gantanX Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) Nusantara Declaration Falsehood is never so successful as when she baits her hook with truth, and no opinions so fatally mislead us, as those that are not wholly wrong - Charles Caleb Colton Our stance about the current ongoing conflict had been conveyed in private to our allies, but we feel the need to announce it publicly. Nusantara will not lend a hand to help a nation's poor attempt to police the world, nor will Nusantara help defending any alliances who get attacked for trying to support this carefully orchestrated pseudo-morality crusade, directly or indirectly. We encourage our allies, alliances, and nation leaders of the world in general, to not put too much power on a single nation leader or you will be disappointed seeing that those powers you entrusted on him, being abused for satisfying personal ego and for settling down personal grudge, hidden under the false premise of restoring the moral of the community. We understand if you must enter the war on that side, it is your choice, but understand that we won't be with you this time. [ooc] We believe we are all equal and a player should not have more say than the Admin Almighty Himself on how we should play this. [/ooc] Have a Nice Day /s/ MahaPrabu - Cyrus0321 Mahapatih - gantanX Edited January 25, 2010 by gantanX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James I Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Sit back and enjoy the glow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micheal Malone Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Fair stance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalTrevor Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I love NEW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lebubu Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Expected this. Enjoy the show, guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takku Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Well said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hertugen Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Get more pop corn! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Now ive seen it all. NEW neutral...swoon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabonnobar Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Very disappointing to see this. You have Mutual Defense treaties, not Optional Defense. I still love you guys. But. Yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volatile Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Simple and true. A clear stance by NEW. o/ NEW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terveis Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Just a question, if TPF should go in, will you still sit this one out? If yes, why write MADP:s when you treat them as MDoAPs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTheFirst Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I consider NEW to be very much like FOK and in that sense I'm not surprised you're speaking out against any form of world police. I like the way you handled this, NEW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickenzilla Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 To each their own. A fair stance. Good luck sitting this one out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsoxbronco1 Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) You've tech raided my heart <3 EDIT: I'm gonna need my left ventricle back. Edited January 25, 2010 by rsoxbronco1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yerushalayim Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 As has been said, a fair stance. o/ NEW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabonnobar Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Just a question, if TPF should go in, will you still sit this one out? If yes, why write MADP:s when you treat them as MDoAPs? or oDoAPs. NEW. Sigh. Wars aren't entered due to the validity or invalidity of the CB. Or, not usually. Your mutual defense pacts don't come with disclaimers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromp Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Enjoy the show, you Indonesian warriors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Interesting news. GL NEW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) Nusantara Declaration Falsehood is never so successful as when she baits her hook with truth, and no opinions so fatally mislead us, as those that are not wholly wrong - Charles Caleb Colton Our stance about the current ongoing conflict had been conveyed in private to our allies, but we feel the need to announce it publicly. Nusantara will not lend a hand to help a nation's poor attempt to police the world, nor will Nusantara help defending any alliances who get attacked for trying to support this carefully orchestrated pseudo-morality crusade, directly or indirectly. We encourage our allies, alliances, and nation leaders of the world in general, to not put too much power on a single nation leader or you will be disappointed seeing that those powers you entrusted on him, being abused for satisfying personal ego and for settling down personal grudge, hidden under the false premise of restoring the moral of the community. We understand if you must enter the war on that side, it is your choice, but understand that we won't be with you this time. [ooc] We believe we are all equal and a player should not have more say than the Admin Almighty Himself on how we should play this. [/ooc] Have a Nice Day /s/ MahaPrabu - Cyrus0321 Mahapatih - gantanX So what you are trying to say is that some of your allies join the conflict in the Polaris's side you will not honor your treaties with them, this is a very honorable move Also this war isn't a "carefully orchestrated pseudo-morality crusade" we don't orchestrated the \m/ raid against FoA, we don't orchestrated \m/ members acting like idiots in private. We also stand for our belives and do not support coawards moves like bully the weak just because you can. But this expected comming from an alliance who behave like \m/. How I said yesterday, in war time you see where your allies stands, happily I'm not allied with such alliance. Edited January 25, 2010 by D34th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youwish959 Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 or oDoAPs. NEW. Sigh. Wars aren't entered due to the validity or invalidity of the CB. Or, not usually. Your mutual defense pacts don't come with disclaimers. This man is correct. Unless your defense pacts hold exception clauses for this I don't see how you can get out of honoring them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneLOL Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I support your stance. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneLOL Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 This man is correct. Unless your defense pacts hold exception clauses for this I don't see how you can get out of honoring them. Cancel them in advance, rethink your treaty partners in the midst of this conflict. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Now ive seen it all. NEW neutral...swoon. And I'm agreeing with you. Mark up another on the things you never thought you would see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 This man is correct. Unless your defense pacts hold exception clauses for this I don't see how you can get out of honoring them. They will have plenty of new people who will snap them up even if they dont honour any of their treaties and leave their allies to be crushed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youwish959 Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Cancel them in advance, rethink your treaty partners in the midst of this conflict. I have not seen any cancellations from NEW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.