Jgoods45 Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 (edited) ** Picture the flags of Athens, Ragnarok, GOD and \m/ Here** Individual Surrender Terms for the Members of The Phoenix Federation Individual terms of surrender are now available for nations of The Phoenix Federation. I would like to make it clear that Athens's and Ragnarok's problem is not with TPF's membership, but with those government officials who were complicit in the plotting against us and our associates. This is not your war. Do not feel obligated to fight it. It it no act of cowardice to surrender when you are fighting for a bad cause or for the wrong reason. In fact, it is the sanest thing that you can do. All PoW camps will be protected by their respective alliances. 1) Switch your alliance affiliation to "*Alliance You Surrendered To* PoW" (Athens PoW, Ragnarok PoW, \m/ PoW or GOD PoW) 2) Decommission all Guerrilla Camp improvements and all Nuclear Weapons. Remain neutral for the remainder of the conflict. 3) PM the nations you are at war with, as well as the leader of the alliance you are surrendering to. Convenient links to their nations: Athens: Londo Mollari Ragnarok: Van Hoo II GOD: Xiphosis \m/ : Cheif Savage Man , Comrade Goby or Emperor Marx /s/ Londo Mollari, Archon eponymos of Athens /s/ Van Hoo II, Emperor of Ragnarok /s/ Xiphosis, Dark Lord of the Global Order of Darkness /s/ Chief Savage Man, Comrade Goby, Emperor Marx, the Triumvirs of \m/ Edited December 30, 2009 by Jgoods45 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hymenbreach Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 It's fashionable to do this at the end of wars, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mongol-Swedes Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 I doubt many will take these terms. Then again, the TPF that spearheaded the destruction of the Verein might not be the same TPF we see today. Good luck, TPF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 nice terms. o/ Athens o/ Ragnarok o/ GOD and since this is gonna be a rare thing: o/ \m/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trace Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 It's fashionable to do this at the end of wars, no? Perhaps they hope for this to not be a long war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shimmer Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Could of just attacked the leaders to achieve the same result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 It's fashionable to do this at the end of wars, no? Individual surrender terms have always traditionally been available near the beginning, if not at the very start, of a war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natan Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Peace in our time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 This is not your war. Do not feel obligated to fight it. It it no act of cowardice to surrender when you are fighting for a bad cause or for the wrong reason. In fact, it is the sanest thing that you can do. All PoW camps will be protected by their respective alliances. Some self reflection might help about now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Could of just attacked the leaders to achieve the same result. i have never gotten the point of this as any alliance worth it, will defend their leaders if they got attacked..... so why just hit the leaders? it is pointless in my opinion. not to mention, the leaders are chosen by the people and thus, the people pay for that decision. learn to pick smarter leaders who don't do dumb crap and you won't have this problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Even though we're not at war, I'd like to announce that Athens, GOD, and Rok can merge into Zenith and be a part of our forces at anytime. Your new overlords will treat you with compassion and dignity. Not \m/ though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eden Taylor Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 I'm impressed by such classyness. I hope this works well, but after VieTPF I can't imagine anyone would be so quick to jump ship unfortunately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Good terms, hopefully alliance terms will be along similar lines and along soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Good terms, hopefully alliance terms will be along similar lines and along soon I didn't know TPF was looking to surrender yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Could of just attacked the leaders to achieve the same result. Better yet, they could have contacted them and resolved this without war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadshot Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Interesting development. As Bob said, let's hope alliance terms are along soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrux Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 GRL needs to hit 50 before real terms, k fellas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Nova Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 There are better individual terms than in years past. Not to bad guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 I didn't know TPF was looking to surrender yet. I expect they wouldn't mind if there were no terms, though I haven't talked to them directly on that point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 i have never gotten the point of this as any alliance worth it, will defend their leaders if they got attacked..... so why just hit the leaders? it is pointless in my opinion. not to mention, the leaders are chosen by the people and thus, the people pay for that decision. learn to pick smarter leaders who don't do dumb crap and you won't have this problem. I don't believe TPF is a democracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilkenny Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 ** Picture the flags of Athens, Ragnarok, GOD and \m/ Here** Individual Surrender Terms for the Members of The Phoenix Federation Individual terms of surrender are now available for nations of The Phoenix Federation. I would like to make it clear that Athens's and Ragnarok's problem is not with TPF's membership, but with those government officials who were complicit in the plotting against us and our associates. This is not your war. Do not feel obligated to fight it. It it no act of cowardice to surrender when you are fighting for a bad cause or for the wrong reason. In fact, it is the sanest thing that you can do. All PoW camps will be protected by their respective alliances. 1) Switch your alliance affiliation to "*Alliance You Surrendered To* PoW" (Athens PoW, Ragnarok PoW, \m/ PoW or GOD PoW) 2) Decommission all Guerrilla Camp improvements and all Nuclear Weapons. Remain neutral for the remainder of the conflict. 3) PM the nations you are at war with, as well as the leader of the alliance you are surrendering to. Convenient links to their nations: Athens: Londo Mollari Ragnarok: Van Hoo II GOD: Xiphosis \m/ : Cheif Savage Man , Comrade Goby or Emperor Marx /s/ Londo Mollari, Archon eponymos of Athens /s/ Van Hoo II, Emperor of Ragnarok /s/ Xiphosis, Dark Lord of the Global Order of Darkens /s/ Chief Savage Man, Comrade Goby, Emperor Marx, the Triumvirs of \m/ Sir, in response to your Surrender terms the citizens of Huntonian send you this message: NUTS good day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sakura Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Could of just attacked the leaders to achieve the same result. There could be a problem, since the one most cited as being the instigator is in peace mode. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 (edited) Alliance terms can't come until mhawk gets back from vacation at least to apologize and admit he was wrong Unfortunate. Edited December 30, 2009 by Penlugue Solaris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banksy Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 It's fashionable to do this at the end of wars, no? This is obviously the end of the war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 It's fashionable to do this at the end of wars, no? Er, what? Why would you have individual terms for a war that ended? Vox had individual terms WAY before we ever had our war end. Not bad at all guys. I mean, if anything, these terms help them build faster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.