Sargun II Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) Treaty of Aphrike Preamble: The undersigned nations, in the interest of promoting stability, unity, and discussion amongst nations of Africa, establish the Treaty of Aphrike. Article I - Sovereignty: Each of the signatories recognize the continent of Africa as a sovereign, whole being and will do every in their power to protect it. Article II - Non-Aggression: By attaching their signature to this document, the undersigned nations agree to act in a non-hostile, courteous manner to each other and to do everything within their power to prevent hostile actions from befalling one of the signatories. Should any signatory partake in unprovoked aggressive action towards another signatory, then the remaining signatories are required to assist the defender in any way possible. Article II takes precedence over all other existing treaties. Article III - Mutual Defense: Understanding that a united Africa contains tenfold the amount of strength that a divided Africa does, the undersigned nations agree to come to the aid of one another should they come under foreign attack. Article IV - Membership: Aside from the undersigned nations, the stipulations for signing the Aphrike treaty are the following: 1. The population, government or geography of the nation is primarily African 1a. The geographic and political area commonly known as the Middle East is considered a sister to Africa and, following review by existing signees, may be considered "African" 2. Acknowledgment that the Aphrike treaty is held above and takes preference over all others 3. Must not hold overseas colonies 3a. Colonies is defined as any mass of land outside of Africa or the Middle East that is not considered part of the homeland OR not given the exact same rights as members of the homeland Article IV.i - Representation and Voting: Each nation is represented by one delegate from their country. Each nation may submit a resolution or proposal to the rest of the signees at any time, at which point the undersigned nations will vote for approval or rejection. Depending on the pertinence of the resolution, a nation may delegate if they feel it necessary to do so. Article V - Expulsion: Should any nation violate the articles of the Aphrike treaty, they will be expelled without ceremony. Article VI - Withdrawal: Should any nation wish to withdraw from this pact, then they will do so and not be looked down upon by the rest of the signatories. There is a courtesy period of 48 hours after withdrawal that the signee must still honor the pact. Article VII - Land Disputes: It should be noted that in areas of land disputes, diplomatic attempts must be attempted first before hostile measures can be taken. This includes non-signees of the treaty. Article VIII - Weapons of Mass Destruction: All signees of the Aphrike treaty must come to terms that use of Weapons of Mass Destruction is only accepted when there is no other alternative or if it is the only choice that continues to allow the survival of your people. Signees, Carthage Rebel Army Novak Libya United Mechodamian States Articles II and IV and VI have been amended for purposes of clarity only and the United Mechodamian States has become a signee. Edited November 20, 2009 by Sargun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 The United Mechodamian States is proud to be a signatory of this great treaty as it signifies a united Africa. We do not tolerate the colonialism portrayed by imperialistic powers, and we hope that under this new banner, we will assure a continent free of greed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acca Dacca Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 Unity continues. We are very happy to see this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "Unity. Yes, this is a good stepping-stone for African Unity. But it will not be complete until there is no war in Africa, until all African nations stand united under its banner." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted November 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "Unity. Yes, this is a good stepping-stone for African Unity. But it will not be complete until there is no war in Africa, until all African nations stand united under its banner." "Precisely why such war-starting nations like Serca and Johto have not been invited to become part of an African brotherhood." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nagato the Great Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 We are glad such a treaty has been created; we would like join, and likely will in the near future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "Precisely why such war-starting nations like Serca and Johto have not been invited to become part of an African brotherhood." "Even though they are African...Johto, we can see you leaving out--they directly attacked one of your members. But where in their history has Serca attacked anyone?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted November 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "Even though they are African...Johto, we can see you leaving out--they directly attacked one of your members. But where in their history has Serca attacked anyone?" "Serca attacked a fractured Republic during the Republic civil war years ago and was directly responsible for the fall of the PAC." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "Serca attacked a fractured Republic during the Republic civil war years ago and was directly responsible for the fall of the PAC." "They did not start that war, and they were attempting to put an end to the bloodshed then. Just how did they contribute to the PAC's downfall?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amyante Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 *** Public *** "Zargathia congratulates the signatories, and hopes this treaty will lead to the stability and peace that you hope to achieve by it." ***Classified to UMS *** "Just wondering, but we were wondering if Article IV would create problems with your Korean territories. We figured a personal transmission on this matter would be preferable over a public broadcast, as we are most likely simply misreading something." *** Private *** Queen Amyante and her Chief of Security Ulrica Rajani were discussing the latest events, after the message was sent. Ulrica - "So, planning to recognize Carthage now?" Amyante - "I don't know... Every time i'm planning to, they go and do something stupid that has me change my mind." Ulrica - "Heh, so what's going to happen now?" Amyante - "Well, i'm thinking of recognizing them... So it'll be total war in Africa in a month, most likely." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted November 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "They did not start that war, and they were attempting to put an end to the bloodshed then. Just how did they contribute to the PAC's downfall?" "Putting an end to the bloodshed by invading a nation in crisis that was already being invaded by another African nation and even Canada? Despite overwhelming odds, the fractured rebels in the Republic managed to fend off two insanely powerful nations and Serca and Serca made it only worse by threatening to have the war spill over into Serca and possibly other territories at this point. Further, Serca's unwillingness to follow the PAC was the catalyst for other nations to withdraw." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nagato the Great Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 ***Classified to UMS ***"Just wondering, but we were wondering if Article IV would create problems with your Korean territories. We figured a personal transmission on this matter would be preferable over a public broadcast, as we are most likely simply misreading something." OOC: I may be wrong, but isn't it true that those territories belong to the RA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 ***Classified to UMS ***"Just wondering, but we were wondering if Article IV would create problems with your Korean territories. We figured a personal transmission on this matter would be preferable over a public broadcast, as we are most likely simply misreading something." ***Classified Response*** We do not own any territory in Korea. [OOC: We need to finish that other thread. Sorry! D:] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iKrolm Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 OOC: I may be wrong, but isn't it true that those territories belong to the RA? OOC: Don't forget Ecuador too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nagato the Great Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 OOC: Don't forget Ecuador too. OOC: Also RA... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amyante Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) ***Classified Response***We do not own any territory in Korea. [OOC: We need to finish that other thread. Sorry! D:] *** Classified to UMS *** "Ah true, we apologize for the misunderstanding." ***Classified to Rebel Army *** "Just wondering, but we were wondering if Article IV would create problems with your Korean territories. We figured a personal transmission on this matter would be preferable over a public broadcast, as we are most likely simply misreading something." OOC: And this, kids, is why you should proofread your posts Edited November 20, 2009 by Amyante Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "Putting an end to the bloodshed by invading a nation in crisis that was already being invaded by another African nation and even Canada? Despite overwhelming odds, the fractured rebels in the Republic managed to fend off two insanely powerful nations and Serca and Serca made it only worse by threatening to have the war spill over into Serca and possibly other territories at this point. Further, Serca's unwillingness to follow the PAC was the catalyst for other nations to withdraw." "If a a neighbor goes violently unstable, wouldn't you intervene to prevent it from spilling over the border? And unwillingness in what way? They forced no one to agree with them." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) *Private* At the news of the UMS joining the Treaty of Aphrike, several high level NoN Ministers facepalmed, a loud crack echoing amongst the collective groans and several outbursts of expletives. *Open* With the addition of the UMS, the last nation capable of standing up to this emerging menace in Africa, we cannot help but express our outright disappointment and horror. To the current Prefect of the UMS, why would you sully your nation's honour by siding with these tyrants? Edited November 20, 2009 by Executive Minister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah Tintagyl Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 3a. Colonies is defined as any mass of land outside of Africa or the Middle East that is not considered part of the homeland OR not given the exact same rights as members of the homeland "Covering your tracks there aren't you gentlemen..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Nova Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 We welcome our brothers, the UMS. We were once allied to your predecessor's and are proud to be allied to the group that makes up your nation once again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "Would the Treaty of Aphrike signatories be seeing the other nations with the same measure as you see yourselves,ie, according to your Article 3a, Colonies is defined as any mass of land outside of Africa or the Middle East that is not considered part of the homeland OR not given the exact same rights as members of the homeland So, if another nation has a territory in Africa whose population has the same rights as the people of the home island, by your own definition, that area will not be considered a colony? Interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 "Covering your tracks there aren't you gentlemen..." "Indeed...Quite ingenious of them, isn't it?" Dripping sarcasm. Dripping so hard it could be heard falling onto the floor. "Would the Treaty of Aphrike signatories be seeing the other nations with the same measure as you see yourselves,ie, according to your Article 3a,So, if another nation has a territory in Africa whose population has the same rights as the people of the home island, by your own definition, that area will not be considered a colony? Interesting. "We sure hope it is so. Because otherwise, they are gigantic hypocrites." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 *PRIVATE* To the Nation of Nod: We do not sully ourselves by siding with these so-called 'tyrants'. Although their methods may be out of place of what we look for in leaders, their goals meet our ultimate demands: an anti-imperialistic bloc that does not support those who feel that Africa is just another feeding ground. Perhaps they will act with belligerence and I can understand the Nodic mindset, more or less dealing with the incident in Raochin and Mandalore. We couldn't agree more, but it is time that we propel ourselves into a position where we can actually unite Africa instead of killing off any and all bonds that hold us together. Maybe our voice can be a voice of reason, perhaps not, but we must at least try to reel in the reigns if our ideal future is to be surmised. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted November 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) "Covering your tracks there aren't you gentlemen..." Carthage reminds the world that this is to fight imperialism in Africa - not to police the world. If you have a problem with an African nation in your continent, it is your job to police your part of the world. The signees of the Aphrike treaty respect the sovereignty and decisions each other makes even if we may have differing political opinions. This is not the No-Colonies Pact, this is the Treaty of Aphrike. The key phrase here is Africa. Edited November 20, 2009 by Sargun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 Carthage reminds the world that this is to fight imperialism in Africa - not to police the world. If you have a problem with an African nation in your continent, it is your job to police your part of the world. The signees of the Aphrike treaty respect the sovereignty and decisions each other makes even if we may have differing political opinions. This is not the No-Colonies Pact, this is the Treaty of Aphrike. The key phrase here is Africa. "And if, by chance, a nation DOES take action to expel an African naton from their continent...would that not activate the Defense clause of the treaty?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.