Kn1nJa Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Another honorable opponent enters the arena of battle. I wish you well TSO! We still will not give up. We may look beaten to death, but we will never give up. o/ Everyone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crymson Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 We salute our brothers at TSO! It's an honor to be fighting alongside you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykep Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Goodbye milestone of 800 nukes. Welcome to the battlefield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 TSO, did I ever tell you guys I love you and you're awesome? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scythegfx Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 The Sweet Oblivion The TSO will not use any nuclear weapons until nuked first. Anyone else see what's wrong with this post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extraduty Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 My only question is, how can your flag be one big nuke symbol and not have a first strike policy at all times. lol Seriously though, welcome to the fight fellas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepiB Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 My only question is, how can your flag be one big nuke symbol and not have a first strike policy at all times. lolSeriously though, welcome to the fight fellas We don't nuke for karma, we nuke for TSO and TOP. Any questions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandal Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 My only question is, how can your flag be one big nuke symbol and not have a first strike policy at all times. lol Because before the start, we had an average of 14 nukes to the total membership of the alliance. Pretty awesome when you rank 23rd in total nukes with 53 people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amonra Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 It's a shame all of my defensive slots are full, I would have liked to taste one of you. I do have one offensive slot open, but thats for a very special person.If he ever comes out and plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tekken Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 o/ TSO o/ TOP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinnai Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 o/TSO o/TOP Don't worry...i'm sure someone will strike you first with their nukes so you won't have to go nuke free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewatk432 Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 o/ The Oblivion has become much Sweeter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Glen Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 (edited) [Personal Statement: NOT alliance statement] So, we declared on Orion via our defensive pact with NPO, over the course of the next several days TAB, TCB, FoK and TOP declare on us in defense of Orion, now TSO comes in 'in DEFENSE of TOP', an alliance so far and away militarily superior to ours that even on our BEST day, if we weren't already at war with four other alliances, we couldn't win. Does anybody else see what's wrong with this picture? Here's what it looks like to me; you see an opportunity to win points in a major war, shortly after declaring your existence (relatively speaking) by jumping in to support your friends, but how do you ensure victory? By gangbanging alliances already too overwhelmed to do anything about it. That's called bandwagoning, and it makes TSO (or at least their gov) an alliance of whimps. This has nothing to do with Invicta's position, and I believe you've already recieved supportive statements from the more kind-hearted and congenial of our membership, but if I EVER have the opportunity to fight against you in a war in the future I will, and I won't let up till the ground is soaked with your blood. We'll see how you feel about it. Maybe this is just a giant misconception on my part; if so please enlighten me, but I'd be shocked if you can give a legitimate explanation for this action.[/personal statement] Edited April 28, 2009 by Sir Glen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keltoi Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 "We shall defend our [alliance] whatever the costs may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing-grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender!"ZI here I come As it should be, I salute your stance and your alliance. o/ warriors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Dan Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 It is an honor to fight beside you, brothers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scythegfx Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 The Sweet Oblivion The TSO really? /grammar nazi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepiB Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 (edited) Sir Glen, you are not the only people at war with multiple alliances. Good luck. Edited April 28, 2009 by SleepiB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandal Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 [Personal Statement: NOT alliance statement] So, we declared on Orion via our defensive pact with NPO, over the course of the next several days TAB, TCB, FoK and TOP declare on us in defense of Orion, now TSO comes in 'in DEFENSE of TOP', an alliance so far and away militarily superior to ours that even on our BEST day, if we weren't already at war with four other alliances, we couldn't beat. Does anybody else see what's wrong with this picture? Here's what it looks like to me; you see an opportunity to win points in a major war, shortly after declaring your existence (relatively speaking) by jumping in to support your friends, but how do you ensure victory? By gangbanging alliances already too overwhelmed to do anything about it. That's called bandwagoning, and it makes TSO an alliance of [expletives deleted here]. This has nothing to do with Invicta's position, and I believe you've already recieved supportive statements from the more kind-hearted and congenial of our membership, but if I EVER have the opportunity to fight against you in a war in the future I will, and I won't let up till the ground is soaked with your blood. Maybe this is just a giant misconception on my part; if so please enlighten me, but I'd be shocked if you can give a legitimate explanation for this action.[/personal statement] You're still under the assumption that your alliance is the only one being attacked here, caring little if nothing at all of the others you call allies who are also in this mess for attacking other alliances with signatories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Glen Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 (edited) It's not multiple fronts that bothers me; hell, I'd take on a dozen alliances if I thought the declarations were legitimate. What BOTHERS me is the ludicrous notion that A) TOP needed the help against us or B ) That this action is in any way DEFENSIVE. I have a problem with the TSO declaration specifically. Also, I am posting here as it relates to me/my alliance. The fact is I DO care very much for my allies in this, and I salute them. I would be very surprised if they don't feel the same way, whether they are willing to admit it or not. I'll quote myself here By gangbanging alliances already too overwhelmed to do anything about it. The use of the plural ALLIANCES there is deliberate; I am equally outraged about the damage this does to BAPS, UPN and Echelon. Edited April 28, 2009 by Sir Glen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstep Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 [Personal Statement: NOT alliance statement] So, we declared on Orion via our defensive pact with NPO, over the course of the next several days TAB, TCB, FoK and TOP declare on us in defense of Orion, now TSO comes in 'in DEFENSE of TOP', an alliance so far and away militarily superior to ours that even on our BEST day, if we weren't already at war with four other alliances, we couldn't beat. Does anybody else see what's wrong with this picture? Here's what it looks like to me; you see an opportunity to win points in a major war, shortly after declaring your existence (relatively speaking) by jumping in to support your friends, but how do you ensure victory? By gangbanging alliances already too overwhelmed to do anything about it. That's called bandwagoning, and it makes TSO (or at least their gov) an alliance of whimps. This has nothing to do with Invicta's position, and I believe you've already recieved supportive statements from the more kind-hearted and congenial of our membership, but if I EVER have the opportunity to fight against you in a war in the future I will, and I won't let up till the ground is soaked with your blood. We'll see how you feel about it. Maybe this is just a giant misconception on my part; if so please enlighten me, but I'd be shocked if you can give a legitimate explanation for this action.[/personal statement] We asked them to join us and provided their targets for them... tbh not all of TOP is fully mobilized so militarily this shouldn't make a big difference to your alliance as you'd likely only be attacked by more TOP members if they didn't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewatk432 Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 really?/grammar nazi. He's German give him a break Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scythegfx Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 I think the point he was getting at is that this DoW was almost completely pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Buscemi Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 (edited) Welcome to the fray. Glad to have you with us! Edited April 28, 2009 by Steve Buscemi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke William I Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 TSO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krzyzewskiville Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 TSO Vult! Thanks for the support, guys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.