Max Power Posted November 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 Better late than never? Bizarrely, that was the name of the now defunct BN-SC treaty. Gold star for you. And nukes, but first gold star. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 I dont know if it's sad or funny that it is taking 3 alliances to stop the Mighty forces of SRA.... As sad or funny as the degree to which you're buying into your own self-absorbed spin. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 Numbers don't lie Sir William. The huge loss you have taken at the hands of SRA (what all 5k more damage we gave then recived ) must be dealing a larger psychological blow to your forces. Why else call in such a lopsidedly large force to deal with us? And please no more "it's your top tier" stories either. Those lost validity when Java swept through all tiers and made us 1/3rd of their total offensive wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Quintus Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 Psychological blow? Heck I am loving these low, low daily payments and you can't beat the camaraderie. It's almost as warm as the nukes! Seems pretty simple. We engaged TOP/Kaskus, couple/three days later you guys jump on us. Ergo, we need more guys/slots, much in the same manner I would imagine you and TOP discussed your own entry. Somebody/bodies have lots of guys available for us? Great! Why bring a flyswatter to a skeet shoot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 Numbers don't lie Sir William. The huge loss you have taken at the hands of SRA (what all 5k more damage we gave then recived ) must be dealing a larger psychological blow to your forces. Why else call in such a lopsidedly large force to deal with us? And please no more "it's your top tier" stories either. Those lost validity when Java swept through all tiers and made us 1/3rd of their total offensive wars. We've taken a huge loss at the hands of SRA? I didn't know that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Quintus Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 We've taken a huge loss at the hands of SRA? I didn't know that The more you know. Plus, Einstein had it right, it's all relative, baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 I'm equal parts amazed and equal parts surprised that you're genuinely buying into your own hype, Xanth. It does your alliance a disservice. tJL entered to hit your uppers. That much is fact. Just as we opened up our target field (by declaring on Kaskus) because all of our forces weren't committed (on TOP) our allies have done the same (on the remainder of your alliance). It's logically absurd to assume that changes their original motive. But I suppose that doesn't support your point, so why not twist it? Heh. And please no more "We're so tough, you're so weak, why else are we outnumbered!?" arguments. It's disingenuous at best - entirely foolhardy and dangerous at worst - to assume anyone owes you a fair fight and that your enemy won't use the resources they have at their disposal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOLO SWAG Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 Xanth, I thought we were having fun? What happened?To clarify, Kashmiri Co-Prosperity is not optional and it is not mutual. It's a gentlemen's agreement. E-lawyering and attempting to "call out" the use of an "optional clause" is pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 I'm equal parts amazed and equal parts surprised that you're genuinely buying into your own hype, Xanth. It does your alliance a disservice. tJL entered to hit your uppers. That much is fact. Just as we opened up our target field (by declaring on Kaskus) because all of our forces weren't committed (on TOP) our allies have done the same (on the remainder of your alliance). It's logically absurd to assume that changes their original motive. But I suppose that doesn't support your point, so why not twist it? Heh. And please no more "We're so tough, you're so weak, why else are we outnumbered!?" arguments. It's disingenuous at best - entirely foolhardy and dangerous at worst - to assume anyone owes you a fair fight and that your enemy won't use the resources they have at their disposal. You say so many things and all i see is counter the Asses :P How can i not enjoy pointing out you had to call in friends to fight the 10 of us? Xanth, I thought we were having fun? What happened? To clarify, Kashmiri Co-Prosperity is not optional and it is not mutual. It's a gentlemen's agreement. E-lawyering and attempting to "call out" the use of an "optional clause" is pointless. I am still loving this war :P Never in a million years did we expect a counter so mind boggelingly one sided that it almost makes us feel special. Though if i had one real gripe to pick with you guys its that all 4 of my targets refuse to keep fighting and just sit there as turtles in the bottom tier :P Kenny dont drop too low before my offensive slots open up. I need one good target from you guys before SRA is little more than a glowing green husk. As far as the elawyering goes SRA cares very little of the validity of your entry into this conflict. You entered and thats that just as we entered and that is also that. The addition of Java, while a tad overkill (see swatting a fly with a shotgun) just means our top tier (larger than yours <_< >_>) can actually have some fun this time around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Quintus Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 1) You entered and thats that just as we entered and that is also that. 2) The addition of Java, while a tad overkill (see swatting a fly with a shotgun) just means 3) our top tier (larger than yours <_< >_>) can actually have some fun this time around. 1) See we agree here, we're in it, let's rock! 2) To be precise I was talking about not using a flyswatter to shoot skeet, but that's academic. Both are amusingly inappropriate. 3) Congrats on that top tier. I feel bad you didn't come to visit last week, before I lost almost half of my infra. Hope that doesn't happen over your way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattski133 Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 And please no more "We're so tough, you're so weak, why else are we outnumbered!?" arguments. It's disingenuous at best - entirely foolhardy and dangerous at worst - to assume anyone owes you a fair fight and that your enemy won't use the resources they have at their disposal. I am still loving this war :P Never in a million years did we expect a counter so mind boggelingly one sided that it almost makes us feel special. Though if i had one real gripe to pick with you guys its that all 4 of my targets refuse to keep fighting and just sit there as turtles in the bottom tier :P By this logic, our coalition is the most fearsome group of warriors ever assembled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted November 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 Seems like SRA is already cracking from the whopping nine wars we've declared on them, most of which have been on a specific set of three nations Kashmir wanted us to pinpoint. It's really more like cutting open a fly with a scalpel, wouldn't you say? On second thought, I like mattski's version better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Letterkenny Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 (edited) 1) Kenny dont drop too low before my offensive slots open up. I need one good target from you guys before SRA is little more than a glowing green husk. 2) As far as the elawyering goes SRA cares very little of the validity of your entry into this conflict. 1) I relish the thought of nuking you. 2) Then shut the fuck up. Do you do anything but complain and act out the "woe is me" persona? The huge loss you have taken at the hands of SRA (what all 5k more damage we gave then recived ) must be dealing a larger psychological blow to your forces. That's rich. I actually chuckled. You see, unlike the socialists, we hardly crumble after one measly round against the terrible twins of Kaskus and Red Ass. No psychological blows have been nor will be dealt. See you all at zero infra. Who really needed help in Kashmir was Ghost, who is being dominated by our man thisispep in a fashion that I am almost certain will bring about Kashmir's ultimate undoing. I almost feel bad about unleashing him upon them, but, as they say, all's fair in love and war. Undoubtedly sarcasm. Edited November 14, 2013 by Letterkenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenoCore Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 1) I relish the thought of nuking you. 2) Then shut the fuck up. Do you do anything but complain and act out the "woe is me" persona? That's rich. I actually chuckled. You see, unlike the socialists, we hardly crumble after one measly round against the terrible twins of Kaskus and Red Ass. No psychological blows have been nor will be dealt. See you all at zero infra. Letter is mine <3 forever and always. Also, letter don't be mean to your temporary allies no matter how crappy at war they are. o/ letter for Kashmir dictatorship. o/ keno for Kaskus dictatorship Let the merger begin into the mighty Kasmir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 (edited) 1) I relish the thought of nuking you. 2) Then shut the fuck up. Do you do anything but complain and act out the "woe is me" persona? That's rich. I actually chuckled. You see, unlike the socialists, we hardly crumble after one measly round against the terrible twins of Kaskus and Red Ass. No psychological blows have been nor will be dealt. See you all at zero infra. Undoubtedly sarcasm. The sooner you guys stop taking the things I post outside of dows and treaties (op only) serously the sooner we can find common ground. Edited November 14, 2013 by Xanth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 In the Javahouse, that's the kind of action we support. And here all this time I thought TJL was a contemplative AA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted November 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 And here all this time I thought TJL was a contemplative AA. Elaborate, s'il vous plait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devnull Posted November 15, 2013 Report Share Posted November 15, 2013 Well, I thought I'd just post here to clear things up. We at the Sandwich Confederation are indeed activating our ODoAP with tJL against SRA and The Legion. That's how things are de facto anyway. If anyone wants a separate post, I'm sure we can put one together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted November 15, 2013 Report Share Posted November 15, 2013 Undoubtedly sarcasm. Fucking finally. Now carry this concept to half of our sides posting and maybe you will start to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenoCore Posted November 15, 2013 Report Share Posted November 15, 2013 Well, I thought I'd just post here to clear things up. We at the Sandwich Confederation are indeed activating our ODoAP with tJL against SRA and The Legion. That's how things are de facto anyway. If anyone wants a separate post, I'm sure we can put one together. Kaskus and SRA leadership have seen it. Unless unknown smurf thinks otherwise, I think making your own topic is unneeded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted November 15, 2013 Report Share Posted November 15, 2013 Fucking finally. Now carry this concept to half of our sides posting and maybe you will start to understand. I think he it's finally starting to get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted November 15, 2013 Report Share Posted November 15, 2013 Well, I thought I'd just post here to clear things up. We at the Sandwich Confederation are indeed activating our ODoAP with tJL against SRA and The Legion. That's how things are de facto anyway. If anyone wants a separate post, I'm sure we can put one together. Welcome to the war! I mean usually one would post one for hails and such but if you are above such gestures, then I reckon that is your admin given right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 Elaborate, s'il vous plait. Activating an optional treaty in support of NSO/NGs plotting doesn't meet the rhetoric of TJL's embassy at CoJ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOLO SWAG Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 Activating an optional treaty in support of NSO/NGs plotting doesn't meet the rhetoric of TJL's embassy at CoJ.What optional treaty are you referring to, Schatt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helium Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 Activating an optional treaty in support of NSO/NGs plotting doesn't meet the rhetoric of TJL's embassy at CoJ. I thought CoJ disbanded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.