magicninja Posted April 6, 2012 Report Share Posted April 6, 2012 [quote name='jerdge' timestamp='1333358873' post='2947235'] If I might ask, how much room do your rules leave to individual initiative? (If I am going in the classified terrain please just feel free to ignore my question.) [/quote] Depends on the situation. For example it's fine for a member to sign up on another alliance's forums to be go meet new people etc. but it is not ok for said member to say speak on behalf of GATO or offer up treaties without MoFA or AC consent. War or spying without authorization is something we really have zero tolerance for because those things can get a whole alliance in trouble and most incidents leading to those actions can be handled easily through diplomacy. A member will be charged every time. If ever there was an alliance that took it's charter, laws, and tenets seriously it is GATO. We don't put these laws in place to hold down the membership or to try to be inefficient. It is so proper thought and oversight can be given to any action and loose cannons do not jive with that philosophy. I can see where Walford is coming from in some respect but he should know better than anyone that those words in those documents do not bend for anyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phineas Posted April 7, 2012 Report Share Posted April 7, 2012 (edited) [quote name='magicninja' timestamp='1333685791' post='2948892'] Depends on the situation. For example it's fine for a member to sign up on another alliance's forums to be go meet new people etc. but it is not ok for said member to say speak on behalf of GATO or offer up treaties without MoFA or AC consent. War or spying without authorization is something we really have zero tolerance for because those things can get a whole alliance in trouble and most incidents leading to those actions can be handled easily through diplomacy. A member will be charged every time. If ever there was an alliance that took it's charter, laws, and tenets seriously it is GATO. We don't put these laws in place to hold down the membership or to try to be inefficient. It is so proper thought and oversight can be given to any action and loose cannons do not jive with that philosophy. I can see where Walford is coming from in some respect but he should know better than anyone that those words in those documents do not bend for anyone. [/quote] edit: I'll blog this reply since it's pushing the line Edited April 7, 2012 by Phineas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azhrarn Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 (edited) Interesting explanation. I always suspected you had never really left the game, and your actions, as usual, follow from your principles. Edited April 9, 2012 by Azhrarn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.