XRCatD Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 **Classified** *Facepalm* **End Classified** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vasili Markov Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 We would like to see proof of these allegations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavo Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 ***Classified*** "Tahoe is really threatening someone after they have millions and have millions more displaced? Perhaps we should have made sure they were hit more..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: So who really did attack Tahoe, and with what, exactly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted February 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: Dragonisia attacked me with cruise missiles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: Dragonisia attacked me with cruise missiles OOC: Yes, I finally saw the post...and there's no way you could have known it was him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakwars Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: he could calculate trajectories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: Yes, I finally saw the post...and there's no way you could have known it was him. OOC: Satellites? They take pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted February 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: Luckily, science is on my side (wikipedia is not an accurate scientific source). Cruise missiles are easy to track and every claim he has put forth about it has been roundly disproven, plus I allegedly sold the materials which obviously would have been trackable. Finally, my spy satellites easily picked up any IR signatures especially in large numbers headed for Tahoe, which is why my SDI was able to shoot down 70% of the missiles. An SDI doesn't work if they are supposedly "invisible" now does it? Still though, whining about OOCly won't help him in the long run since he will be destroyed one way or another. Today, tommorrow or in six months. It is coming Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Your ridiculous slander of Dragonisia has been noted. Do not attempt to invade any portion of the Australasian region, or you will face the combined might of not only the Australasian Coalition, but of all other powers represented in the region. "Maybe you should check with your ally that he ran out of missiles." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserMelech Mikhail Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 After seeing the devestation of war, we wish to do everything we can to stop another major nuclear war. Both nations are invited to Marscury to settle their differences and engage in peaceful dialogue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted February 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 We have no desire to use nuclear weapons on Dragonisia and will do our best to avoid doing so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 (edited) ooc: Since this apparently got burried as the last post of page 1, I will link back to my six independent sources which prove the truth that there are such things as stealth icbms.. and a true general concern those ICBMs could easily penetrate a U.S. defense net. No Lavo, science is not on your side, and I have the sources to back it up. And your attitude out of character that I'll just destroy him whenever.. for whatever reason, wreaks of metagaming. Here's the proof, again, that this can and has been done: ooc: Not going to repeat myself to much, but just to ensure both these threads are covered where the doubters are.. it's possible. Russia has them. here is proof: They're not detected. ^ Doesn't even take into account the immense interference of local nuclear attacks occurring on Bob. Ruling handed down by Sargun: [00:29] <Sargun> tell tahoe and LVN to read all the articles and find ways to refute them[00:29] <Sargun> other than "science says" because for all I know they're lying [00:29] <Sargun> Then put these logs up and say that unless they can disprove your facts with a link of their own, then stop complaining [00:30] <Maelstrom_Vortex[NPO]> Roger. Edited February 19, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 "Maybe you should check with your ally that he ran out of missiles." "We have not run out of missiles. We have our standard quota of 50 and 15 spares. Any nation of the world is welcome to send a delegation to verify, although they will not be allowed to take notes, take photos, or bring any observation equipment so as to prevent industrial espionage." Defense Minister Anthony Davis would respond. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: You have not linked once to a credible IR stealth ICBM, just one supposedly radar stealthed. There is no way to stealth a ICBM from IR detection during the boost phase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 (edited) Bits of new information have become available about that highly secretive warhead. Citing unnamed sources in the SRF, several Russian media outlets claimed that the trajectory of Igla is not just difficult but, in fact, impossible to predict because its auxiliary engines switch on and off randomly. The targeting system of the warhead itself is supposed to keep track of changes in the trajectory and eventually guide the warhead toward its target. Also, Igla reportedly utilizes "stealth" technology--a special coating makes it "invisible" to heat or electromagnetic impulses and thus more difficult to detect than ordinary warheads. Edited February 19, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: 2 things. 1. The chances of them producing that is low because such weapons (orbital nukes) were specifically banned and both nations signed it. 2. Link to the article? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 (edited) ooc: The previous post before that one has the link baron. I keep getting lucky and getting the last article on each page, then no one reads them.. (or so it seems). Ninja Edit: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1280463 Source 4, I think. Edited February 19, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 (edited) OOC: /me shrugs I don't like bringing this point here, but reportedly, the weapon achieved its breakthrough testing in late 2005. Your nation has 200 tech. Even if you consider your past tech sharing (which brought you to 900, I think), that would still be behind 2005 (in between 2001-2005, it'd be). Also, the Russian division is the one claiming it to be untraceable - and really, they are only claims. Nothing explaining why it would be wholly untraceable - though it cites that its coating would be detection harder, but not impossible, of course. ...Might as well ICBM the whole world if it is impossible to track. EDIT: And in regards to the satellite not being able to detect the launch(es)... keep in mind fifty missiles in total were launched. Edited February 19, 2009 by V The King Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 (edited) OOC: /me shrugsI don't like bringing this point here, but reportedly, the weapon achieved its breakthrough testing in late 2005. Your nation has 200 tech. Even if you consider your past tech sharing (which brought you to 900, I think), that would still be behind 2005 (in between 2001-2005, it'd be). Also, the Russian division is the one claiming it to be untraceable - and really, they are only claims. Nothing explaining why it would be wholly untraceable - though it cites that its coating would be detection harder, but not impossible, of course. ...Might as well ICBM the whole world if it is impossible to track. EDIT: And in regards to the satellite not being able to detect the launch(es)... keep in mind fifty missiles in total were launched. ooc: Back when I was tech trading with Rockport, it was much higher. That's when the design was completed. The missiles came from a variety of places, including silos that were below the ocean floor relatively near the coastline. When I was trading with other partners, technology was briefly around 2006-8. I have no reason to launch ICBMs against the whole globe, that WOULD be foolhardy indeed. This retaliation for past policy decisions was extremely calculated. Edited February 19, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 (edited) ooc: Back when I was tech trading with Rockport, it was much higher. That's when the design was completed. The missiles came from a variety of places, including silos that were below the ocean floor relatively near the coastline. When I was trading with other partners, technology was briefly around 2006-8. I have no reason to launch ICBMs against the whole globe, that WOULD be foolhardy indeed. This retaliation for past policy decisions was extremely calculated. OOC: In other words, he has them...but he can't make any more now. Satisfied? Edited February 19, 2009 by Subtleknifewielder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 ooc: Back when I was tech trading with Rockport, it was much higher. That's when the design was completed. The missiles came from a variety of places, including silos that were below the ocean floor relatively near the coastline. When I was trading with other partners, technology was briefly around 2006-8. I have no reason to launch ICBMs against the whole globe, that WOULD be foolhardy indeed. This retaliation for past policy decisions was extremely calculated. OOC: LVN and I generally stay between 100-200 tech of eachother. Your not getting much more. IC: The United Francoist Empire hereby suspends its tech sharing agreement with the Dragonasian Empire, citing our obligations to the Tahoe Empire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: LVN and I generally stay between 100-200 tech of eachother. Your not getting much more. IC: The United Francoist Empire hereby suspends its tech sharing agreement with the Dragonasian Empire, citing our obligations to the Tahoe Empire. OOC: Dude, he's cited articles NOT from wikipedia that support his claim. What more does he have to do? They were undetectable. Deal with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 OOC: Dude, he's cited articles NOT from wikipedia that support his claim. What more does he have to do? They were undetectable. Deal with it. OOC: Articles which support radar stealth only. There is no missile in the world today with IR stealth during the boost phase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 (edited) OOC: Dude, he's cited articles NOT from wikipedia that support his claim. What more does he have to do? They were undetectable. Deal with it. OOC: ... The article itself states that the protection makes it harder to detect, not impossible (which was a claim by its creators, derp). OOC: In other words, he has them...but he can't make any more now. Satisfied? And he just made a RP thread where he's producing thousands of them over the course of a year. Edited February 19, 2009 by V The King Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.