Jump to content
  • entries
    2
  • comments
    10
  • views
    3,820

The Decline


Homura

273 views

 Share

Lately the overwhelming opinion of Digiterra has been one of overt hostility and even aggression towards the New Pacific Order and its allies. While there's always been some dislike of the NPO for various reasons, it's never been a movement quite as organised or powerful as what's been seen lately, not even in the days of Great Wars past. So what has changed?

A mantra often repeated by Pacificans is "Pacifica Prevails!" And for years it has. Nobody has successfully dealt any long term damage to Pacifica to date, even when the alliance seemed devestated after the Great War or Great Patriotic War as it's known to Pacificans. But there is a reason Pacifica has prevailed. The alliance was home to some of the most innovative people and was built on revolutionary ideals, which resulted in frequent success as the ability to adapt to changing conditions allowed an efficient and effective response to many challenging situations. There are still remnants of a formerly great culture of equality which existed in the hierarchical structure, where nobody was intended to be irreplacible or more important than another, even if in reality things cannot always work perfectly or as planned.

However in more recent months, the alliance has more often than not been resistant to new ideas even while openly courting them. NPO did not change the price paid for technology from 3 million for 150 tech until well into 2008, when the rest of the world found that rate to be inefficient since mid-2007, along with a few other significant internal matters which I'm not going to discuss in a public setting as they are more sensitive issues, but which generally were dismissed by alliance leadership, i.e. the Imperial Officers. In the case of the tech rate, it was primarily due to the insistence of the NPO Bank.

Part of the underlying reason for all of this relates to a near stagnation in leadership, with some retaining their positions for years. There is, of course, nothing wrong with retaining effective leaders, but it becomes easy to develop a fixed mindset regarding the manner of operations as time progresses, which is exactly what many people observed was occurring. One of the most ambitious proposals to combat this was that to create a third Order on Yellow, however this never came to fruition for various reasons.

In August 2007, it was announced that Ivan Moldavi was returning to the position of Emperor of the New Pacific Order, that TrotskysRevenge was resigning and would be Regent. Within NPO, the mood was that of both surprise and excitement. Days later we were informed that our forums were moving, and Ivan had staged a coup d'├ętat. A very real possibility for continuing positive change had been stopped in favour of preserving the status quo, both internally and externally, although as history shows, it made little difference externally with the collapse of the Initiative a month later.

Over time, the alliance lost some of its most talented people who easily could have become the next generation of NPO leadership, such as Doitzel and Rebel Virginia. The dispute and disconnect with the New Polar Order further progressed this loss, and it could easily be argued that losing the NpO was losing half the Order and the talent that went with it. The network of allies surrounding Pacifica became easy to depend on, but they had their demands as well, creating a situation of primarily outside rather than self-reliance.

And now a large portion of that network is lost and a lot of former NPO talent is actively working against them. Once dependable allies like VE have become antagonists, others like MHA are withdrawing their support, and there's a very real chance that Pacifica could be facing a stronger and more well prepared opponent in war.

I can't predict the outcome, but if Pacifica wants to prevail again, it's going to require a hard look at the way they're currently doing things, making difficult changes, and a lot of dedication and will to stay on through trying times - a revival of revolutionary spirit. I can't easily get caught up in this argument of "karma", but in analysing the true situation, it's clear that the previous and current modus operandi of the New Pacific Order produced some rather undesirable results.

 Share

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

[O]thers like MHA are withdrawing their support, and there's a very real chance that Pacifica could be facing a stronger and more well prepared opponent in war.

That's a god damned lie Katsumi. MHA has not "withdrawn her support" from Pacifica. We have not canceled any treaties. We do not agree with this war, we were not consulted about this war and we have no intention of finishing a war we never wanted to start. If bandwagoners attack Pacifica, we will defend Pacifica against them.

Check your damn facts before you make unverified and spurious claims.

Link to comment
That's a god damned lie Katsumi. MHA has not "withdrawn her support" from Pacifica. We have not canceled any treaties. We do not agree with this war, we were not consulted about this war and we have no intention of finishing a war we never wanted to start. If bandwagoners attack Pacifica, we will defend Pacifica against them.

Check your damn facts before you make unverified and spurious claims.

Oh is it now? If you don't agree with the war and don't participate, how are you supporting them right now? And was the Continuum not a treaty? Are you speaking English or Newspeak? Because you must be aware your comment was self-contradictory. Maybe it would serve you well to think about what you're saying before you throw a little temper tantrum because I was well aware of the facts when I wrote this and they do support my conclusion, not to mention my own alliance is in a similar position to kill bandwagoners.

Or if it really bothers you that much that I mentioned your lack of support, go in and fight for them, but either way I won't think you're wrong for doing it.

Link to comment

The Continuum is the name of a bloc that comprises many alliances. We withdrew from that bloc. If it was a slight against Pacifica, then it was a slight against all former treaty partners as well. If you check your facts, we are still allied to Pacifica via an Eternal MDoAP with a 1 year cancellation clause. We have no intention of cancelling that.

I will not stand idly as my alliance is misrepresented and I would hope to think you would not either if you read something like that.

Link to comment

The Continuum situation should be seen as separate from supporting Pacifica. There are a number of alliances in Continuum, and while Pacifica has frequently been seen as the leader of the bloc, it hasn't always been the case.

I'm not entirely convinced that VE has been reliable; they've attacked both Orders since their reformation.

And I don't think lumping Doitzel in with RV is appropriate.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...