CRUSHTANIA SMASH!!!

I can't believe you didn't mention that some names are so good, you use them twice, use them twice.

I hate this blog, Needs mention of more mad dogs

Haha, I think I'll write my next blog about the Mad Dog Crew.

You must like my friends.

I abbreviate nearly everyone's name.

Dawny and Dilber are the only two people I talk to often that I use more than four letters for.

I imagine most people who make generic, crappy names are the sort of people who would never attain CN success due to lack of imagination (as exemplified in their names ), motivation, talent, etc., but this blog had me wondering: if somebody who was skilled and talented and whatnot made one of these crap names, how much would they be held back by it? I guess not terribly much, since, no offense to Slayer99, going by your examples you could say he has a "crap name" since it's basically the same template as narutofan2001 (something the player is a fan of + numbers) just with a different subject matter, a metal band in this case.

but this blog had me wondering: if somebody who was skilled and talented and whatnot made one of these crap names, how much would they be held back by it?

Can't really strong-arm someone with <Narutofan1001[Alliance]> - no one will take you srs.

I was quoted? Hooray!

But to rebut MD, but the proportion of good named leaders to crap named leaders are at least 20:1 in the "good name" category. I've dealt with a raft of &#33;@#&#036;kicker microalliance leaders in my time, and 90% of them had horrible, unimaginitive names. And $10 says that most of their start up alliances never survived.

Slayer99's case is arguably different, but unfortunately true - he uses a Slayer avatar to directly link his name to the "fandom" of Slayer. If he didn't, it could be considered borderline "OK"