Jump to content

War Charts

Sign in to follow this  
  • entry
    1
  • comments
    13
  • views
    1,841


13 Comments


Recommended Comments

Do the colours mean anything?
Probably to differentiate between the fronts (LSF-NOR, MK-CSN, Umb-Fark, NG-RIA).

What he said. They might change, though, as more alliances get attacked...

Share this comment


Link to comment

Now we just need a chart like this with the percentage of war mode nations included for each AA.

Not a PM joke directed toward any particular alliance, it's just tough determining the overall level of strength being committed to one side or the other when so many nations are effectively out of the picture and may not enter.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Blame it on my having been back for less than a month, but I don't understand why these conflicts are being lumped together.

Now we just need a chart like this with the percentage of war mode nations included for each AA.Not a PM joke directed toward any particular alliance, it's just tough determining the overall level of strength being committed to one side or the other when so many nations are effectively out of the picture and may not enter.

That would be a nightmare to administer, since those numbers could change, dramatically and literally, overnight.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Blame it on my having been back for less than a month, but I don't understand why these conflicts are being lumped together.

Because all of this mess originated from the same conflict: LSF-NoR

Share this comment


Link to comment

Blame it on my having been back for less than a month, but I don't understand why these conflicts are being lumped together.

While you've been gone MK & CO have become rather more liberal with how they deal with coalition warfare. They no longer wait for counters or only hit people that activate certain treatys. They just cherry pick AA's to hit that suit their plans and they bring in people from their side to best suit regardless of treatys as well. This is why the map above is disjoined and unconnected cause in the old days people would of considered this several small independent wars with independent CB's etc. Welcome to where we got to while you've been gone. lol

Share this comment


Link to comment
Blame it on my having been back for less than a month, but I don't understand why these conflicts are being lumped together.
While you've been gone MK & CO have become rather more liberal with how they deal with coalition warfare. They no longer wait for counters or only hit people that activate certain treatys. They just cherry pick AA's to hit that suit their plans and they bring in people from their side to best suit regardless of treatys as well. This is why the map above is disjoined and unconnected cause in the old days people would of considered this several small independent wars with independent CB's etc. Welcome to where we got to while you've been gone. lol

In the past, there would be a bunch of ghost declarations, but the end result would be achieved anyway. Why maintain such a pointless system?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...