War Charts

Thats what I have been looking for. Thanks

Do the colours mean anything?

Do the colours mean anything?

Probably to differentiate between the fronts (LSF-NOR, MK-CSN, Umb-Fark, NG-RIA).

Do the colours mean anything?

Probably to differentiate between the fronts (LSF-NOR, MK-CSN, Umb-Fark, NG-RIA).

What he said. They might change, though, as more alliances get attacked...

Now we just need a chart like this with the percentage of war mode nations included for each AA.

Not a PM joke directed toward any particular alliance, it's just tough determining the overall level of strength being committed to one side or the other when so many nations are effectively out of the picture and may not enter.

Thanks for the map!

Blame it on my having been back for less than a month, but I don't understand why these conflicts are being lumped together.

Now we just need a chart like this with the percentage of war mode nations included for each AA.Not a PM joke directed toward any particular alliance, it's just tough determining the overall level of strength being committed to one side or the other when so many nations are effectively out of the picture and may not enter.

That would be a nightmare to administer, since those numbers could change, dramatically and literally, overnight.

Blame it on my having been back for less than a month, but I don't understand why these conflicts are being lumped together.

Because all of this mess originated from the same conflict: LSF-NoR

Blame it on my having been back for less than a month, but I don't understand why these conflicts are being lumped together.

While you've been gone MK & CO have become rather more liberal with how they deal with coalition warfare. They no longer wait for counters or only hit people that activate certain treatys. They just cherry pick AA's to hit that suit their plans and they bring in people from their side to best suit regardless of treatys as well. This is why the map above is disjoined and unconnected cause in the old days people would of considered this several small independent wars with independent CB's etc. Welcome to where we got to while you've been gone. lol

It's all related.

Blame it on my having been back for less than a month, but I don't understand why these conflicts are being lumped together.

While you've been gone MK & CO have become rather more liberal with how they deal with coalition warfare. They no longer wait for counters or only hit people that activate certain treatys. They just cherry pick AA's to hit that suit their plans and they bring in people from their side to best suit regardless of treatys as well. This is why the map above is disjoined and unconnected cause in the old days people would of considered this several small independent wars with independent CB's etc. Welcome to where we got to while you've been gone. lol

In the past, there would be a bunch of ghost declarations, but the end result would be achieved anyway. Why maintain such a pointless system?

Needs an update.

Add us!