OmniBlog

Should a treaty really be rethought because your friend's friend's friend is someone you dislike?

Besides, you get more fun possibilities this way. NSO can pull NPO in with them to PB's side. And MK could then fight alongside Polar against NPO.

How exactly would MK end up on Polaris's side?

Don't all wars here either start off as or end up being $%&@ed up, though? (or near enough)

How exactly would MK end up on Polaris's side?

I was expanding from the OP's scenario of putting NSO (via Hydra) on PB's side, and Athens opposing them. MK signed a treaty with Athens 2 weeks ago and NPO is NSO's ally.

The web is so convulted that it has almost done away with the concept of "sides". Something like that happening would just be the final nail on the coffin.

Yeah, that wont happen.

I was expanding from the OP's scenario of putting NSO (via Hydra) on PB's side, and Athens opposing them. MK signed a treaty with Athens 2 weeks ago and NPO is NSO's ally.

The web is so convulted that it has almost done away with the concept of "sides". Something like that happening would just be the final nail on the coffin.

This

and obviously it's not happening Banksy. I was pointing out how different things are from past wars. People used to cancel their treaties and go with one side or the other. That obviously doesn't happen as much anymore.

Here's hoping this war finally gets people to pick a side in advance and let their allies know. It's a game, have fun with it. You can be friends and not have an MDP in a game, trust me.

NpO->Legion->NPO->NSO->Hydra->SLCB->iFOK

NpO is 5 degrees from being brought in against its own side.

Edit: Could have been shorter if RoK chose differently.

You know, this is why World War 1 got so complicated.

Holy crap, Paavi is alive!

Hey Omniscient1!

Our war has been very exciting, i have enjoyed it very much.

Bad thing is that we are not on the same side but hopefully we will meet again when the war is over.