The Goon Experience

Also, no one answered my question. How many other alliances offer their raided targets a way to permanent peace?

Most offer the same kind of peace that you do. Most allow "PM for peace" to get a raided target on a no-raid list for that particular alliance.

This isn't permanent peace though, really. As you may be aware, there are dozens of raiding alliances, and getting raided by each of them, especially in a GOONS-style triple team for seven days each, is not healthy for a nation.

Most offer the same kind of peace that you do. Most allow "PM for peace" to get a raided target on a no-raid list for that particular alliance.

This isn't permanent peace though, really. As you may be aware, there are dozens of raiding alliances, and getting raided by each of them, especially in a GOONS-style triple team for seven days each, is not healthy for a nation.

Roger, I Don't know how other raiding alliances deal with this. I like the idea of not only peacing out with a raided nation but giving them permanent peace from our alliance.

Roger, I Don't know how other raiding alliances deal with this. I like the idea of not only peacing out with a raided nation but giving them permanent peace from our alliance.

Yes, the problem comes in when raiding alliances act like you do and require the raided nation to fight for 7 days against a tripleteam and then register on your forums in order to get peace from one alliance.

At a week per raiding alliance, that's going to take at least a year of constant tripleteams. Collecting in anarchy for a year isn't really going to work, the raided nation is going to delete.

As some one who has done a lot of work in recruiting/admissions, I have found that GOONS have done well in peacing out with nations once they join the applicant AA.

and the one time I've had to request peace for a nation once they joined the applicant AA of my alliance at the time it was rejected. Flow chart needs a bullet point saying that some or all stages are dependent on how much GOONS likes you

Yes, the problem comes in when raiding alliances act like you do and require the raided nation to fight for 7 days against a tripleteam and then register on your forums in order to get peace from one alliance.

At a week per raiding alliance, that's going to take at least a year of constant tripleteams. Collecting in anarchy for a year isn't really going to work, the raided nation is going to delete.

Well then these nations might want to make some friends if we're not the only Alliance raiding them.

Now regardless of other alliances raiding the same targets we might of raided. If said nation does go through the mercy board they will be protected from us at least.

To me that sounds like a good thing. They might meet people they may not of before and learn more about the game and the "politics" that runs it.

So... I just had a look at nato12's thread on the Mercy Board. I'm pretty sure he's a minor. Do you guys feel it's appropriate to post, well, images of nude men on a forum where you require under-18 people to register?

So... I just had a look at nato12's thread on the Mercy Board. I'm pretty sure he's a minor. Do you guys feel it's appropriate to post, well, images of nude men on a forum where you require under-18 people to register?

Hay mom, I need to do a report on the White House I'm going to look online. "whitehouse.com".

Damn it's been changed how long ago I don't know.

http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-202985.html

lol

Whitehouse.com was shut down in the '90s. You can probably guess why.

and the one time I've had to request peace for a nation once they joined the applicant AA of my alliance at the time it was rejected. Flow chart needs a bullet point saying that some or all stages are dependent on how much GOONS likes you

That's possible, but depending on how long ago that was, it could have been simply a different standard at the time. We really do try to administer our policies uniformly.

lol

Whitehouse.com was shut down in the '90s. You can probably guess why.

Aye that it was, my point still stands.

For this to be more informative a couple of examples of what sort of things are typical of mercy board terms would be a great help.

Aye that it was, my point still stands.

Your point being that people who post pornographic images in areas where minors are encouraged to view them get shut down by the FBI?

Your point being that people who post pornographic images in areas where minors are encouraged to view them get shut down by the FBI?

The site wasn't shutdown by the FBI the man took it down himself because even he knew how easy it was for a minour to find the site.

My point being, it's rather easy for children to find porn without trying. So to bring that up as an argument against the mercy board is rather trite. Also after looking at the nato12 thread again myself, I do not see an images that I would say were pornographic.