Jump to content
  • entries
    38
  • comments
    813
  • views
    35,441

Highlights from WCE: Part 15

Sign in to follow this  
Sardonic

183 views

I bet you thought I was done, didn't you? Well, there's more, and even after I'm done with the coalition channel logs, I will be adding a special bonus edition where I highlight the the silliness of a very special leader of a very special alliance.

[20:25] <@Daggarz[Nemesis]> these are the alliances we can rely on am i right?

[20:25] <@HeroofTime55> GOONS as a head of a bloc is a TERRIBLE idea, GOONS at the head of CN

[20:25] <@Daggarz[Nemesis]> TPF, CoJ, Nemesis, NoR, NpO, LoSS(which would mean IAA and GATO), NSO, 64Digits, DT, Valhalla, UPN, Invictia, BAPS, OcUK, NoV, RoA, AZTEC

[20:25] <@MegaAros> That we have to move fast.

[20:25] <%pezstar> Look, folks. GOONS is actually in the right here. So if you want to attack them, do it because you're afraid of them and you don't like them.

It's pretty funny how PB has somehow become a bloc led by us. We're one of the smaller elements in it, and it's not a MADP bloc that can be moved by a single alliance.

[20:25] <%Biff[CoJ]> How far into the future? after a few of us have been picked off?

[20:25] <@Daggarz[Nemesis]> GOONS is in the right?

[20:25] <@Daggarz[Nemesis]> in what universe

Daggarz is my favorite, he fundamentally thinks we cannot be in the right. It's funny to watch them run around like chickens with their heads cut off at the prospect of us "picking a few of them off", as if we would do such a thing.

[20:27] <@Daggarz[Nemesis]> they have hit a 100 day old UPN member

[20:27] <%bzelger[sTA]> will GOONS pay reps for that?

[20:27] <@HeroofTime55> UPN is to give them an out to avoid war, pay 90m reps per day of that war, it was a '

[20:27] <@HeroofTime55> a'nuclear raid' on goons part, right?

[20:28] <~Schattenmann> back

[20:28] <@HeroofTime55> GOONS will never pay because they're dumb, and god forbid something isn't profitable

HeroofTime, as always, is flat wrong. We would not not pay that because we are dumb, we would not pay that because we are not dumb. 90m for a raid incident is extortion, the very thing that they so ardently accuse us of. Just another example of their "morals when convenient" philosophy.

[20:29] <@Daggarz[Nemesis]> we were going to hit them regardless, this just provides legality

[20:29] <%pezstar> There's not a damn thing wrong with declaring war because GOONS is a horrible alliance and causes way too much !@#$.

Actually there is, you look like an idiot, if the Ninjas and FnKA incidents have taught us anything.

[20:29] <%Biff[CoJ]> I think we should just toss all that legality <removed>

[20:29] <@HeroofTime55> ^ that's what I basically am here for Pez, and I consider it sufficient

[20:29] <%Biff[CoJ]> WE won't ever win a PR war.

I agree, you should abandon all pretense of morality and attack us, it will make it that much easier to justify the reparations you'd have to pay us after it was all over.

[20:29] <%pezstar> If they raided a UPM member, there's your CB. There's no law that says you have to accept reps for a raid. Say it's one too many raids.

[20:29] <%pezstar> There you go.

[20:30] <%pezstar> Bzelger found you a CB.

[20:30] <%pezstar> Send em aid.

[20:30] <@HeroofTime55> Good

[20:30] <%pezstar> Have an ally send it too.

That's still a really, really, bad CB btw. Anything related to the UOKMB rebels or the mistaken raid is really.

[20:31] <@Peggy_Sue|UPN> http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z214/Peggy_SueS/7efb4037.jpg

[20:31] <@Peggy_Sue|UPN> he declared peace when we called him on it

[20:31] <@Peggy_Sue|UPN> we did NOT say 1 million reps was accepted

[20:31] <@HeroofTime55> Are you <removed> me? UPN, your reputation is working to our advantage, they think they can get away with this

[20:31] <~Schattenmann> Tell them that's not enough

Ah yes, they mention the annoyances with the two members working things out on their own. Of course, if they had bothered to research the situation, they would have found instantly that it was the raided member who requested the 1m. Even beyond that, I told her I would pay a damage calculation rep if she wanted to bother making one (I knew it would be less than 1m anyway, but that's besides the point), further nullifying any CB that could have come out of it. But why do the right thing, when you can use it as ammo to attack an enemy?

[20:32] <%pezstar> You know what? Ignore it. Don't worry about it at all. Don't even worry about reps from them.

[20:32] <%pezstar> Do what bzelger said.

[20:32] <%pezstar> Aid rhe folks at war.

[20:32] <%pezstar> Have your allies send some too.

[20:32] <@Poyples> I still prefer the smashing the hell out of the one GOON transgressing

[20:32] <%pezstar> Then GOONS is forced to agress.

[20:32] <%Biff[CoJ]> Yeah, they'll just move the goalpost if you clear this one.

Aiding nuclear rogues is just as much a crime if they are flying your AA as it is when they were flying their own. Here's yet another a good example of why this coalition really is the Worst Coalition Ever, that they thought they could sell this to people.

Sign in to follow this  


1 Comment


Recommended Comments

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...