Jump to content
  • entries
    7
  • comments
    129
  • views
    2,808

CN World Maps


Caleb279

263 views

CN World Maps  

23 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

I remember back in the day when world maps were kind of a big deal. It appears its starting to get popular again.

Edifice of DecadentPast has decided to make a new one. The formula, rather than NS= total size, is 200,000 NS= 1 territory. The territories being taken from Hears of Iron 2. I don't play it, but the map is pretty snazzy. Throughout his topic "New CN World Map", there have been a few legitimate complaints.

There will not be enough territories to accompany all alliances above 200K NS. Especially when these alliances start to grow, as pointed out by James Dahl, and Letum here:

Hmm, I don't know if there will be enough space on this map to include everyone.

It's roughly 1847 territories, and with a total of 458m nation strength around the world, one territory would be roughly equivalent to 250,000 NS (247 to be exact).

Which leaves the map short of enough territories to meet everyone's needs by about 20%.

Certainly, unaligned people might not be included - but the total NS of none is only 2.6m. You'd need to get quite a lot of small alliances not signing up in order to have enough space, and even then it is a squeeze.

I propose a new map, where one territory= 500K NS, but only alliances over 1 million NS can stake claims. Upon conflicting claims, preference is given to the alliance with higher NS. This is not only easier to keep track of, but also leaves plenty of room for new alliances to enter the game, and currently standing alliances to grow.

To see my chart (complete with AA's, formulas, and hex codes), click here.

I don't mean to steal Edifice's thunder, but I think my idea is better. Let me know what you think...is his idea better, or mine? Or do they both need fixing?

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

Population might be good. Maybe somebody will create a thread with all versions posted in it :awesome:

And Alistair, you could always just reach 1mil and party with the big boys :D

Link to comment

Although I like the 2nd idea first, it should be changed to "And small alliances at least are able to get one territory by default" so not to exclude them.

To still benefit the stronger alliances, they get to pick territories first, and then the little ones take from the leftovers.

Also NoR has dibs on Berlin, Norway and Northern Germany (Depending on how much of it we can occupy.

Link to comment

Although I like the 2nd idea first, it should be changed to "And small alliances at least are able to get one territory by default" so not to exclude them.

To still benefit the stronger alliances, they get to pick territories first, and then the little ones take from the leftovers.

Also NoR has dibs on Berlin, Norway and Northern Germany (Depending on how much of it we can occupy.

I might consider alliances between 200k and 1mil being allowed 1 territory each. We'll see...this isn't actually a bad idea.

Alistair: NO U

Link to comment

I like your idea, Caleb. I think it could work and add an extra element to a game that has a limited number of elements as-is. One thing that drastically needs to change is the use of Google Maps (read: a map of the Earth) in game. I'm not a fan of the "all nations are perfectly round, are perfectly centered around their capital, and can be just as easily placed in the middle of the Pacific Ocean as they can be placed in Niger". Some sort of realism is preferable, perhaps a border that can be reshaped.

Link to comment

I like your idea, Caleb. I think it could work and add an extra element to a game that has a limited number of elements as-is. One thing that drastically needs to change is the use of Google Maps (read: a map of the Earth) in game. I'm not a fan of the "all nations are perfectly round, are perfectly centered around their capital, and can be just as easily placed in the middle of the Pacific Ocean as they can be placed in Niger". Some sort of realism is preferable, perhaps a border that can be reshaped.

Thanks.

I agree...we should be able to bend shapes of our nations, and not go into oceans, etc. Eventually (I doubt it would ever happen, however...) I would love to see CN incorporate this into the game. Then, nations are only allowed to be placed within their alliances borders. Another map will be placed for alliances under 1mil NS, and those not in alliances, or too small to be recognized don't get a spot. This encourages nations to join REAL alliances.

Who knows, it may happen one day.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...