As i sit here trying to remove a splinter from my foot and read the 20+ pages of moralists cry over some people they dont really care about im reminded of something i brought to Fark Government nearly 2 years ago. The loudest complaint about raiding is "OMG OUR TRADES!" Well if this is enacted properly those people who dont want an actual alliance but want to stay in the game would be around to trade with you.
First you take the large alliances on one sphere, im going to use maroon for example, CSN, RIA, MA, GOD, TTK, CRAP and The Brain(lord help me if i forgot one) and you set up an AA that is protected. Since Chestnut Accords is the big bloc of maroon the AA could be "Protected by Chestnut Accords" then you proceed to spam everyone on your sphere who is unaligned and not at war to fly that AA. If a nation is being raided and wants to join then you can do your diplomatic thing and try to help them
Once they begin to fly the AA all that is needed is for one person to keep a watch on the war screen. if raids occur on this AA then again you do your diplomatic thing and if it comes down to it then someone from the protecting alliances gets some more war experience
The only requirements to be on the AA would be you have no active offensive wars and the color of the sphere(in this example, maroon). This would obviously be wildly unpopular with tech raiders but then again not everyone would fly the AA therefore still leaving plenty of fodder out there
Are there holes in this idea? Hell yes! Will many of these 'anti tech raiders' do anything to try to help their sphere? Highly doubtful, afterall how much money has Grub(or Red Dawn for that matter) donated to nations whove been tech raided
Now back to your regularly scheduled trolling, complaining, and general "Do something about it!"
P.s. i support tech raiding