PenkLOLa's thoughts

So is it the official policy of VA that I am now PZI listed? This, too, is unacceptable. You will not PZI me. Far better men would fail.

I'm beginning to think you're just an idiot. Did you really just ask if this is the official policy of VA?

I knew you were thickheaded, but come on. I guess I gave you WAY too much credit.

So yes, this is the official policy of VA, and I'm the grand vizier of VA and my word is law! Then again...

I'm beginning to think you're just an idiot. Did you really just ask if this is the official policy of VA?

I knew you were thickheaded, but come on. I guess I gave you WAY too much credit.

So yes, this is the official policy of VA, and I'm the grand vizier of VA and my word is law! Then again...

Well you're the only one posting anything definitive here.

Well you're the only one posting anything definitive here.

1. it's a blog, who cares

2. the irony in that statement is hilarious. I'm not gov, but you say I'm posting something definitive. Just wow.

3. penkalalalalafail

3. penkalalalalafail

.... wow.

1. it's a blog, who cares

2. the irony in that statement is hilarious. I'm not gov, but you say I'm posting something definitive. Just wow.

3. penkalalalalafail

OMG DUDE DON'T FREAK OUT WOW MAN!!!

OMG DUDE DON'T FREAK OUT WOW MAN!!!

OMG CAPS LOCK IS FUN!

oh, wait...Towlyn?

OMG CAPS LOCK IS FUN!

oh, wait...Towlyn?

What are you going on about now? Listen, how about a little less of the 'hardass' attitude. I still haven't been attacked and your members fighting me have lost 1/3 - 1/2 of their tech and infra it took them hundreds of days to build in two days.

We have neither decided for nor against EZI at this point.

I must say, it certainly is telling of your alliance that you even have to contemplate whether or not to use EZI or not.

I must say, it certainly is telling of your alliance that you even have to contemplate whether or not to use EZI or not.

Commenting without knowing all the facts. I wouldn't have expected any less.

Commenting without knowing all the facts. I wouldn't have expected any less.

Facts do not matter to RV, only truth.

Facts do not matter to RV, only truth.

How can one find truth without all the facts?

What are these "facts" you're talking about? Everything is pretty much out in the open when it comes to Penkala. Unless you are trying to grand stand, which is very likely judging from my history of dealing with you. Let Conner do the talking, atleast he isn't trying to sound shady and intimidating with nothing to back it.

Commenting without knowing all the facts. I wouldn't have expected any less.

The fact is that you will not EZI me, and you will not PZI me. It is unacceptable.

Oh look, a Pacifican! Someone would have absolutely no reason to dislike me. Oh, wait....

I'd check your information on this one, chief. Last time I checked my AA read "The Imperial Order" but, hey, you can keep fudging the data all the same. And no, I simply dislike you because your prattling and attention seeking behavior are repetative in the extreme. You've consistently demonstrated that, when you have backing, you're a tough guy and a hard liner but when the chips are down you run screaming like an eight-year-old who just had his attempt to steal someone's lunch money backfire badly.

Soooooooooooooooooo you leavin or what?

And no, I simply dislike you because your prattling and attention seeking behavior are repetative in the extreme. You've consistently demonstrated that, when you have backing, you're a tough guy and a hard liner but when the chips are down you run screaming like an eight-year-old who just had his attempt to steal someone's lunch money backfire badly.

That ^^ pretty much sums things up. Penkala didn't do much but talk big until he could get BK to attack with him. Last time he had to get a spy in VA and have other nations attack instead of doing it himself.

It's the same song and dance with Penkala each time. He gets encouraged by a select few who, in all essence, don't really matter much in the grand scheme of things, but to Penkala they're messengers from the gods telling him his childlike ways are acceptable and are of redeeming quality. That somehow he's a martyr for some cause against the unjust. In reality, he's just a lowlife with nothing better to do, and here on Bob, that doesn't put you with the greatest company.

He gets encouraged by a select few who, in all essence, don't really matter much in the grand scheme of things

I resent that. I MADE YOU.

It's also very accurate.

I'd check your information on this one, chief. Last time I checked my AA read "The Imperial Order" but, hey, you can keep fudging the data all the same. And no, I simply dislike you because your prattling and attention seeking behavior are repetative in the extreme. You've consistently demonstrated that, when you have backing, you're a tough guy and a hard liner but when the chips are down you run screaming like an eight-year-old who just had his attempt to steal someone's lunch money backfire badly.

I saw the Pacifican pip and somehow read your AA as 'New Pacific Order". CLEARLY this mistake means I am fudging the data.

How do I 'have backing' right now? I'm facing about a half-dozen alliances and fighting 6 v 1. I'm pretty much completely on my own, and I'm not only fighting VA, I'm acting the same way I did a week ago when I was in CSN. In fact, if anything, I'm acting more aggressive publicly, which is a very dangerous thing to do while unprotected.

The only one 'fudging the data' here is you, moron.

That ^^ pretty much sums things up. Penkala didn't do much but talk big until he could get BK to attack with him. Last time he had to get a spy in VA and have other nations attack instead of doing it himself.

It's the same song and dance with Penkala each time. He gets encouraged by a select few who, in all essence, don't really matter much in the grand scheme of things, but to Penkala they're messengers from the gods telling him his childlike ways are acceptable and are of redeeming quality. That somehow he's a martyr for some cause against the unjust. In reality, he's just a lowlife with nothing better to do, and here on Bob, that doesn't put you with the greatest company.

Actually, that's a complete and total lie. If you'll think back to after Karma war, the first time I 'talked big' to you was when I fought your alliance for a month on my own. Without Kane. And the only people who refuse to do the dirty work are VA. Not a single VA nation has attacked me. Instead, you sit back, refuse to discuss peace, and ask your allies to eat nukes for your pride. You did this last time, too. AND the time before that. You refuse to talk to us because of your pride, and you refuse to attack us because of your lack of skill. Why must VA lie about all the facts? Oh, that's right. Because they're wrong.

JWConner, I know you're mad that I keep winning against your alliance. I know you're mad that my friends and I are better than your entire alliance. But you brought this on yourselves. Don't violate surrender terms and I won't have to humiliate your alliance.

I saw the Pacifican pip and somehow read your AA as 'New Pacific Order". CLEARLY this mistake means I am fudging the data.

Yep, you went off half-cocked without attempting for a second to actually figure who I actually was, then dismiss my comments as being politically motivated by an alliance I'm no longer a part of. That shows either 1) you're too lazy to do basic look-arounds or 2) you didn't bother actually taking into account what I said. Either way, you fudged your way through the answer instead of attempting a real response.

How do I 'have backing' right now? I'm facing about a half-dozen alliances and fighting 6 v 1. I'm pretty much completely on my own, and I'm not only fighting VA, I'm acting the same way I did a week ago when I was in CSN. In fact, if anything, I'm acting more aggressive publicly, which is a very dangerous thing to do while unprotected.

Backing comes in many forms, not just the numerical. Getting attention from others as well as getting 1+ nations to follow you into the breach certainly counts as having backing. That this latest foray has not gone like the last couple and, indeed, seems to have gained you the ire of a few people along the way (reference is to Ragnorok government commentary in the OO thread about government impersonation) as well as make you look like a massive joke. If everything was going according to plan you wouldn't be here showboating, you'd be focusing on your war and spending time gathering the resources necessary to make it stick. Yes, your poterior is out in the wind here. I doubt that was the intent from the beginning, thus the comparison to the attempted lunch money theft.

The only one 'fudging the data' here is you, moron.

From this I can only infer 1) I've struck a nerve and 2) you're attempting to twist this line of conversation into a name-calling contest. Very brave, sir, very brave.

Yep, you went off half-cocked without attempting for a second to actually figure who I actually was, then dismiss my comments as being politically motivated by an alliance I'm no longer a part of. That shows either 1) you're too lazy to do basic look-arounds or 2) you didn't bother actually taking into account what I said. Either way, you fudged your way through the answer instead of attempting a real response.

Backing comes in many forms, not just the numerical. Getting attention from others as well as getting 1+ nations to follow you into the breach certainly counts as having backing. That this latest foray has not gone like the last couple and, indeed, seems to have gained you the ire of a few people along the way (reference is to Ragnorok government commentary in the OO thread about government impersonation) as well as make you look like a massive joke. If everything was going according to plan you wouldn't be here showboating, you'd be focusing on your war and spending time gathering the resources necessary to make it stick. Yes, your poterior is out in the wind here. I doubt that was the intent from the beginning, thus the comparison to the attempted lunch money theft.

From this I can only infer 1) I've struck a nerve and 2) you're attempting to twist this line of conversation into a name-calling contest. Very brave, sir, very brave.

1) When did you leave Pacifica?

2) So your position is that nobody is brave unless they strike out on their own, outnumbered 500 to one, and everybody hates them, and that nobody notices the war? Seriously, dude? Yes, I guess I'm 'weak' and a 'coward' because, despite fighting a losing war, people noticed my war. This is possibly the largest stretch I've ever seen in CN.

3) I assure you I have not gained the ire of my long-time ally and former home, Ragnarok. They have no issues with what I have done, and if they do, they have not communicated that with me (and they would have). In fact, the only criticism I have received has been from VA (an alliance I am embarrassing, again.), some old hegemony members who hate my guts, and OO's supposed leadership.

4) I have time to talk here and escalate this war. Just watch and see!

5) No, you haven't struck a nerve, you're just a complete idiot.

1) When did you leave Pacifica?

Sometime last summer? Might have been August or so, I really can't remember. I'm sure Gandroff or one of the other members of the Praetorian Guard would prove helpful if you're really interested in nailing down the date.

2) So your position is that nobody is brave unless they strike out on their own, outnumbered 500 to one, and everybody hates them, and that nobody notices the war? Seriously, dude? Yes, I guess I'm 'weak' and a 'coward' because, despite fighting a losing war, people noticed my war. This is possibly the largest stretch I've ever seen in CN.

No, my position is that what you are doing is not brave. To clarify, my position is that this is yet another cry for attention from a national ruler who needs to be in the spotlight more than have a cause to fight for and gain the spotlight for that. There seems to be no consistent rationale to your behavior beyond being inflammatory, insulting and condescending simply to get a rise out of others. The moment it looks like you're about to fade from center stage you launch into a new ridiculous arc of behavior which thrusts you back to the front. This time it's as a laughing stock but, for better or worse, you're getting the attention you desire.

3) I assure you I have not gained the ire of my long-time ally and former home, Ragnarok. They have no issues with what I have done, and if they do, they have not communicated that with me (and they would have). In fact, the only criticism I have received has been from VA (an alliance I am embarrassing, again.), some old hegemony members who hate my guts, and OO's supposed leadership.

I'll look forward to your remarks on the conversation Alfred has alluded to planning on having with you in about two weeks.

4) I have time to talk here and escalate this war. Just watch and see!

I have no constructive counter-commentary on this point.

5) No, you haven't struck a nerve, you're just a complete idiot.

I think this pretty much sums up your stance on any attempt to have a dialogue and strengthens my point - when in doubt, call the other guy names in attempt to get a rise. Have fun with your war, Penkala.

VA Will not EZI Penkala, CSN will NR and Monty will be around to discuss this with you soon, Penky

VA Will not EZI Penkala, CSN will NR and Monty will be around to discuss this with you soon, Penky

Uh oh. CSN IS GOING TO EZI PENKALA!!! EZI is bad, mmkay? You can't do that. We're going to have to have a talk wickedj. These things are not to be joked about, EVER! How dare you even mention that term. You're gonna get a stern talking to.