Jump to content
  • entries
    13
  • comments
    140
  • views
    8,076

My thoughts

Believland

Entry posted by Believland

263 views

 Share

Having just been exposed to The Order of the Paradox's phlegmatic principles, I ponder how best to express my disgust at The Order of the Paradox's total lack of sensitivity and reasoning. Let's get down to business: The Order of the Paradox has spent untold hours trying to gain a respectable foothold for its squalid remonstrations. During that time, did it ever once occur to it that false denials, pleas for sympathy, and a base campaign for smearing others with its own crimes constitute its whole method of defense? All I can do now is give you a bare-bones answer and then let you dig into it yourself. To understand the basic answer you need to realize that The Order of the Paradox's fans get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with The Order of the Paradox, and meeting some other wicked lamebrains is merely a social event. They're not even aware that The Order of the Paradox has blood on its hands. Yet it pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If The Order of the Paradox really had our best interests at heart, it wouldn't open the gates of Hell.

I suppose it's predictable, though terribly sad, that politically incorrect sciolists with stronger voices than minds would revert to vitriolic behavior. But The Order of the Paradox's bootlickers tend to fall into the mistaken belief that The Order of the Paradox is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative, mainly because they live inside a The Order of the Paradox-generated illusion-world and talk only with each other. It's time to step things up a notch and wage war on ageism, and besides, The Order of the Paradox has two imperatives. The first is to dress up its profit motive in the cloak of selfless altruism. The second imperative is to make our country spiritually blind. Even though The Order of the Paradox gives flattering titles to its natural distempers, if The Order of the Paradox wants to craft propaganda that justifies breaking down our communities, let it wear the opprobrium of that decision.

The Order of the Paradox is foolish, longiloquent, dissolute, vicious, inconsiderate, and snappish. Need I go on? When I was younger I wanted to strip the unjust power from those who seek power over others and over nature. I still want to do that, but now I realize that if one believes statements like, "The only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate—one is, in effect, supporting voluble yokels. I can't make heads or tails of The Order of the Paradox's monographs. I mean, does it want to herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses, or doesn't it? Let us be witness to the horrifying effects of The Order of the Paradox's merciless double standards. Let us examine how it seeks to stifle the voices of those who are simply seeking to be heard. Let us exhibit the moral values, empathy, and wisdom needed to tell the world that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. The Order of the Paradox, however, is more likely to engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts.

What a joyful affair it would be for The Order of the Paradox if it managed to get away with preventing me from sleeping soundly at night. It'd be laughing through its snout like a sow grinning at her little piglets. It'd be chortling at everyone's obliviousness to the fact that its torchbearers consider its convictions a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of classism.

In particular, The Order of the Paradox makes it sound like we can stop elitism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for nutty smut peddlers. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, if The Order of the Paradox wanted to, it could alter, amend, abridge, and censor the record to point the finger of responsibility at others. It could subject us to an intense barrage of misinformation, deception, and hidden propaganda. And it could grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly shabby ways to subvert existing lines of power and information. We must sincerely not allow The Order of the Paradox to do any of these.

I am not interested in debating The Order of the Paradox. One can't have a debate with someone who is so willingly ignorant of the most basic tenets of the subject being discussed. The Order of the Paradox's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. We must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize The Order of the Paradox's overbearing, exploitative manuscripts and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to lay the groundwork for an upcoming attempt to restore the traditions that it has abandoned.)

It may not seem to be very important right now, but The Order of the Paradox likes to compare its credos to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. The Order of the Paradox's propaganda machine once said that The Order of the Paradox would never break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas it deems to be scary. So much for credibility!

If you can go more than a minute without hearing The Order of the Paradox talk about Comstockism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. The Order of the Paradox's confreres are quick to point out that because The Order of the Paradox is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, it is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, The Order of the Paradox is a victim of its own success—a success that enables The Order of the Paradox to delude and often rob those rendered vulnerable and susceptible to its snares because of poverty, illness, or ignorance. So don't tell me that creating needed understanding is best achieved in a calm, rational environment just because it makes it sound like it's some perfect angel of unstained ethical standards.

The Order of the Paradox says that it needs a little more time to clean up its act. As far as I'm concerned, The Order of the Paradox's time has run out. Why The Order of the Paradox would even pretend that it is a spokesman for God is beyond me. Believe it or not, a common thread runs through most of The Order of the Paradox's cop-outs, a thread so muzzy-headed that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness. Yes, I could add that it subordinates rationality in decision making, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "The Order of the Paradox can't control its desire to have everything it wants and to have it now." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that The Order of the Paradox tries to make us think the way it wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us, but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons.

The Order of the Paradox is extremely adversarial. In fact, my Adversarial-O-Meter confirms that The Order of the Paradox loves generating drama and conflict. That's why it repeatedly insists that children should get into cars with strangers who wave lots of yummy candy at them. It's also why it believes in laying waste to the environment. There isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that The Order of the Paradox's opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality—so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of The Order of the Paradox's from the get-go. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that The Order of the Paradox's actions amount to what a proverbial metaphor in Sanskrit describes as trying to extinguish a fire by feeding it enough wood to glut its appetite. I was right when I said that The Order of the Paradox is the type of organization that can look you right in the eye and, with an expression of the utmost sincerity, tell you any kind of whopper that suits its purpose. And I was right when I said that The Order of the Paradox has written volumes about how it is a protective bulwark against the advancing tyranny of uncontrollable franions. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that if it manages to commit confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility, civilization will crumble almost immediately. Investigators from a future era will need to sift through the charred wreckage of our society looking for the black box to figure out what happened. Maybe they'll even discover that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind The Order of the Paradox that it is planning to divert our attention from serious issues. This does not bode well for the future because in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, it used to complain about being persecuted. Now The Order of the Paradox is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that it focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, The Order of the Paradox attempts to twist and distort facts to justify its feelings, but that just goes to show that it is absolutely determined to believe that its snow jobs are our final line of defense against tyrrany, and it's not about to let facts or reason get in its way. Anyone who has spent any amount of time doing his homework knows that one truism with profound implications is that The Order of the Paradox's proposed social programs do not come without a price. Since I don't have anything more to say on that subject, I'll politely get off my soapbox now.

Like I said earlier, this blog isn't worth reading and it was just a random insult generator. TOP are actually some pretty cool cats minus a couple

 Share

12 Comments

Recommended Comments

Titus Pullo

I kept my silence when The Order of the Paradox announced it wanted to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought. I did nothing when it tried to concentrate all the wealth of the world into its own hands. But its latest codices are the straw that breaks the camel's back. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in I'll announce something to the effect of how whenever anyone states the obvious—that The Order of the Paradox's primary viewpoint, that the Complaints and Grievences bloc heads up the international drug cartel, is directly related to the attitudes in our society that transmogrify society's petty gripes and irrational fears into "issues" to be catered to—discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "How will its confidants, who are legion, react when they discover that it wants to produce nothing but filth?" The answer is too well-known to bear repeating, but I should comment that The Order of the Paradox has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then jaundiced, illogical scoundrels will be free to paint people of different races and cultures as rummy alien forces undermining the coherent national will. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to face our problems realistically, get to the root of our problems, and be determined to solve them.

I believe, way deep down, that The Order of the Paradox has for a long time been arguing that tribalism resonates with the body's natural alpha waves. Had it instead been arguing that its politics are an abomination, I might cede it its point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in The Order of the Paradox's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how if the only way to view the realms of poststructuralism and wowserism not as two opposing poles but as two continua, is for me to give in to the quacks, witch doctors, charmers, sorcerers and fortune tellers who tell us that it is a perpetual victim of injustice, then so be it. It would undeniably be worth it because if one could get a Ph.D. in Forum Clutter, The Order of the Paradox would be the first in line to have one.

To give the devil his due, I was impressed with how efficiently The Order of the Paradox managed to sacrifice our essential liberties on the altar of political horse-trading, especially given that I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that he who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. Of course, people like The Order of the Paradox who do in fact perpetrate evil outrage the very sensibilities of those who value freedom and fairness. The Order of the Paradox's desire to progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction is incontrovertible evidence that The Order of the Paradox harbors some debauched grudges. Of course, it's not quite that simple. I have frequently criticized The Order of the Paradox's unspoken plan to undermine liberty in the name of liberty. It usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of Marxism, statism, child molestation, and halitosis. The Order of the Paradox hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that you won't find many of The Order of the Paradox's cringers who will openly admit that they favor The Order of the Paradox's schemes to prime the pump of boosterism. In fact, their squibs are characterized by a plethora of rhetoric to the contrary. If you listen closely, though, you'll hear how carefully they cover up the fact that if history follows its course, it should be evident that The Order of the Paradox's claim that our only chance of saving the planet is to accept unending regulations and straightjacket "reforms" from its cronies is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity but an assault on the human mind.

There is a political agenda behind the "unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point" malarkey. For that reason, every time it tries, The Order of the Paradox gets increasingly successful in its attempts to arouse inter-ethnic suspicion. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought but for imagination as well. The Order of the Paradox's goal is to create a factitious demand for its contentious sermons. This is abject teetotalism! There is no place in this country where we are safe from The Order of the Paradox's henchmen, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Whenever The Order of the Paradox announces that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd, its squadristi applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about The Order of the Paradox and about hypothetical solutions to our The Order of the Paradox problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that all of its energy is expended in stirring up trouble. Stated differently, The Order of the Paradox is trying to hide the fact that it lacks the dim flicker of sentience one needs to qualify as an imbecile. Nevertheless, one thing that rings true with crystalline clarity is that The Order of the Paradox used to complain about being persecuted. Now it is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that The Order of the Paradox is unwilling to stand up for what is true and right if there is no obvious advantage to it in doing so. (Yes, it appears that, for The Order of the Paradox, "open-mindedness" isn't a policy or a belief, but a flag to wave when it feels like it, and one to hide when it doesn't suit its purposes, but that's a different story.)

It will be objected, to be sure, that The Order of the Paradox doesn't honestly want to bring radicalism to this country in the name of anti-radicalism. At first glance this may seem to be true but when you think about it further you'll certainly conclude that it wants to prohibit any discussion of her attempts to silence any criticism of the brainwashing and double standards that it has increasingly been practicing. While it is clear why it wants that to be a taboo subject, The Order of the Paradox demands that its endeavors be discussed in only the most positive light. To ensure that this demand is met, it sends its little empire after anyone who fails to show the utmost deference when planting big, wet, sloppy kisses on The Order of the Paradox's behind. What a joyful affair it would be for The Order of the Paradox if it managed to get away with bombarding me with insults. It'd be laughing through its snout like a sow grinning at her little piglets. It'd be chortling at everyone's obliviousness to the fact that sometimes I think that it is simply a willing pawn of those lackluster barbarians who preach fear and ignorance. I typically drop that willing-pawn notion, however, whenever I remember that implying that The Order of the Paradox's ipse dixits epitomize wholesome family entertainment is no different from implying that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing The Order of the Paradox and the passive-aggressive serpents in its charlatanism movement. Both statements are ludicrous.

Now, lest you jump to the conclusion that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty, I assure you that if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that its initiatives are a syncretism of malicious Lysenkoism and rash sectarianism. That's just a fancy way of saying that it's truly a tragedy that The Order of the Paradox's goal in life is apparently to tear down everything that can possibly be regarded as a support of cultural elevation. Here, I use the word "tragedy" as the philosopher Whitehead used it. Whitehead stated that "the essence of dramatic tragedy is not unhappiness. It resides in the solemnity of the remorseless working of things," which I interpret as saying that I try never to argue with The Order of the Paradox because it's clear it's not susceptible to reason. From what I know of The Order of the Paradox's subliminal psywar campaigns, it is saying essentially three things:

* The rigors that its victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement.

* It has achieved sainthood.

* Its flock is looking out for our best interests.

Obviously, all three of these are doubtlessly tasteless.

I don't normally want to expose anyone to rigorous sarcasm, satire and disdain but The Order of the Paradox really deserves it. If The Order of the Paradox had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages "before technocracy" it wouldn't be so keen to pander to our worst fears. Maybe it'd even begin to realize that those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still contend that it draws its outrageous conclusions from arbitrary statistics, have an obligation to do more than just observe what it is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance. We have an obligation to follow through on the critical work that has already begun. And we have an obligation to cast a gimlet eye on its artifices.

We must get people to sign a petition to limit The Order of the Paradox's ability to cause trouble without the slightest consideration for any screams and complaints that might arise. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Whatever happened to community standards? To ask that question another way, does The Order of the Paradox's oversized ego demand that it con us into believing that anyone who dares to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of insurrectionism can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result? I have searched numerous sources for answers to that question. No two sources seem to agree on any given point except for one: that The Order of the Paradox cites the alleged benefits of immoralism—which are mostly unsupported, irrelevant, or distortions of the scientific literature—to justify brainwashing the masses into submission. The sooner it comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.

If our eventual goal is to counteract the subtle but pervasive social message that says that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking, then we must consider various means to that end. Let me carry my thoughts on this subject a bit further. We must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize The Order of the Paradox's disdainful, savage deeds and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to pronounce the truth and renounce the lies.) While this world still has far to go before people are truly judged on the content of their character, the last time I heard The Order of the Paradox ramble on in its characteristically bibulous blather it said something about wanting to shatter and ultimately destroy our most precious possessions. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that.

The Order of the Paradox makes it sound like it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the prurient hands of abhorrent tricksters. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, The Order of the Paradox repeats the term "undemonstrativeness" over and over again in everything it writes. Is this repetition part of some new drinking game, or is The Order of the Paradox merely trying to confuse us into believing that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate? All I can do now is give you a bare-bones answer and then let you dig into it yourself. To understand the basic answer you need to realize that no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how I find much to disagree with in The Order of the Paradox's jokes. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also champion the force of goodness against the greed of resentful ogres. At this point, our task is to begin the invigorating, rejuvenating process of revealing some shocking facts about The Order of the Paradox's put-downs. Your support can help greatly with this task, this crucial task, at which we must not fail.

Link to comment
LoweAlpine

Stop thinking.

Just follow orders, do war stuff and make less useless blogs, unless you find ppl that do the same as you do.

People are never going to read if it's a tl'dr.

Also, English sucks. The Dutch should never have given Manhattan to the English.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
×
  • Create New...