Jump to content
  • entries
    11
  • comments
    303
  • views
    6,336

TOP's Counteroffer: lol what

Chief Savage Man

Entry posted by Chief Savage Man

1,627 views

 Share
1. The Order of Paradox, Independent Republic of Orange Nations, Democratic Alliance of Wise Nation, The Order of Righteous Nations and The Sweet Oblivion, hereby named for the sake of clarity TIDTT, admit defeat and surrender to the collective forces of the Complaints & Grievances Union, and their allies (list cut off but it then lists all alliances la la la)

2. TIDTT shall pay reparations in the amounts outlined below. In the case of both reparations paid directly by TIDTT and of TIDTT paying for tech deals from other alliances, it is the responsibility of TIDTT to ensure that payments reach targets specified by the receiving alliances.

3. Reparations may be distributed by the Complaints and Grievances Union to any alliance or nation not engaged in conflict with any alliance over 2 nations as they see fit, or any nation within the Complaints and Grievances Union not at war with any TIDTT targets or direct allies of TIDTT.

4. TOP will pay a total of 50k tech in reparations.

5. IRON will pay a total of 40k tech in reparations.

6. TSO will pay a total of 15k tech in reparations.

7. DAWN will pay a total of 5k tech in reparations.

8. TORN will pay a total of 7k tech in reparations.

9. Further along the forces of TIDTT agree to decommission up to 50% of their nuclear weapons in sign of good faith, for the duration of terms. This means they will be protected by the CnG Union for the same duration.

10. None of the nations member of TIDTT are to be left behind. Unless the victorious alliances are asking that we accept a sentence of multiple ZI, all our member nations have fought bravely in this war and have been subject of and the attackers had the opportunity of ZI'ing anyone.

11. Any beverage/food review is available as long as at least one government member of TIDTT is willing to test such things and then write about the experience.

A little birdie (or two <_<) told me this was the counteroffer. 50% of nuclear arsenal. I wouldn't consider anything less than 95% decom if I were CnG. Whatever.

 Share

174 Comments

Recommended Comments



Bob Janova

These are closer to reasonable than the first offer leaked in Ejay's blog, although the final figure will probably be between them. It's also strange to have a partial nuke decom and protection – with protection you'd normally expect demilitarisation.

Link to comment
infinite citadel

Looks like C&G want to kill them off after all. Why not take these reps if they didnt want to either enslave the alliances in question or run them out of the game.

Looks like Alterego is a terrible poster after all. Why not put an ounce of thought into his posts if he didn't want every intelligent poster to kill themselves or be run out of the game by sheer stupidity.

Link to comment
WcaesarD

These are closer to reasonable than the first offer leaked in Ejay's blog, although the final figure will probably be between them. It's also strange to have a partial nuke decom and protection – with protection you'd normally expect demilitarisation.

Not only that, but if it is a sign of good faith, then protection shouldn't be necessary, especially if it's only nuke decomming.

Link to comment
Archon

You guys are idiots. Responding "NUTS!" to this makes absolutely no sense since we aren't asking you to surrender...

It's mockery. When mocking via mimicking, it quite often does not make sense for the mimer (did I just make up a word) to do what they're doing. Except that they're insulting the other party. :haw:

As a side note, your insult has been duly noted, and I am quite pleased to see your arrogance and sense of entitlement has survived this war fully intact thus far. We will be sure to redouble our efforts on that front :v:

Link to comment
AirMe

The original terms had no demilitarization in them. This was an attempt to distract people from the fact that their offer is about 1/3rd of the original terms presented to them.

I personally agree with not having demilitarization terms. So these terms are a step backwards in more ways than one. Instead of coming up with a reasonable counter offer they give us this crap.

Link to comment
Drai

100 thousand tech is unreasonable? lol

I'll keep that in mind. ;)

117k tech from 5 alliances is unreasonable given the nature that the war started.

Link to comment
Dochartaigh

117k tech from 5 alliances is unreasonable given the nature that the war started.

i hope to god that Athens calms down then and does not aggressively attack another alliance ever again. ya'll just setting it up so that if that happens and ya'll lose, you will lose hard.

Link to comment
Trace

And based on these last couple responses the generalizations made of MK appear to hold true. Personal attacks have no place in this game.

Wait what? I'm all down for OOC stuff not being used, cause that's just unimaginative. But calling you an idiot is not something that a) Is anything new b) is remotely considered as to 'have no place' in this game. Seriously, you are a leader of a nation, people are more than welcome to insult you for being an incapable one. Grow a set.

Link to comment
Neo Uruk

So were the other side's.

At least they weren't meant as a slap in the face. I mean seriously, IRON paying 40k tech after starting an aggressive war, faking logs and not knowing how to spell Londo[Athens]? I personally think that last bit should be a cause for another 3k or so tech.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
×
  • Create New...